Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24-11-2005, 06:40 PM   #1
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default VE- Smaller and lighter?

In the latest Wheels magazine they have spy photos of the VE taken at GM's proving ground in the US. In the accompanying article they claim the VE will be slightly smaller externally, with a longer wheelbase for more interior room, and they say it will be lighter in weight. If it is actually lighter than VZ than Ford may have a big problem. Maybe the rumours of the extra weight are false. Holden have had the option of designing weight out of them due to it being a clean sheet design, Ford didn't have that option with the BA upgrade as they were stuck with an existing platform. They won't have the option to design weight out till their next clean sheet design in 2008. Does anyone have an info on weight of VE.

Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-11-2005, 06:55 PM   #2
Smoked
Burnin Rubber
 
Smoked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,824
Default

Cars as a gerneral trend are gettnig heavier as more and more options are designed into them. I find it extremely difficult to believe that its a longer wheelbase and lighter.
__________________
2001 AUII Forte (LPG)
K&N Air Filter
Tickford Air Intake
***Coming Soon: Clear Side Repeaters***
Quote:
Originally Posted by The-ShowStoPPa
...dont get me wrong this 3.8v6 is pretty special, it does come with the popular shake rattle and roll option and the auto compliments this with the ever popular snap crackle and pop feature
Smoked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-11-2005, 06:59 PM   #3
ED Classic
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,119
Default

GM's Proving ground? They might have to sell that one soon

Seriously though Ford will be mad if they continue to push the next Falcon towards the 2 Ton mark. Lighter {done using higher tech materials and built smarter} is the only way to go from now on. Fuel effeciancy is a high priority for alot of large car buyers now let alone when prices get to $2 a litre in the next five years. BF was a good move. When the 6 Auto becomes std on BF2 it will be another good move.
ED Classic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-11-2005, 07:00 PM   #4
T3ts50
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
T3ts50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,094
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoked
Cars as a gerneral trend are gettnig heavier as more and more options are designed into them. I find it extremely difficult to believe that its a longer wheelbase and lighter.
Not necassarily true, Jags, Bemmers and Mercs have all gotten lighter, but have always added extra equipment. But in Holdens case, they would most likely be heavier unless they are using alloy panels.
T3ts50 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-11-2005, 07:02 PM   #5
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

If you look at euro saloons as an example they've continued to gain weight model after model as more safety systems are engineered into them as well as stiffer safer (heavier) chassis's.



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-11-2005, 07:22 PM   #6
flavze
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 239
Default

They may be lighter now, but i know for a fact that in the early stages of development they were having trouble getting it down to an "acceptable" weight, whatever that is.
flavze is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-11-2005, 07:26 PM   #7
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Vman
If you look at euro saloons as an example they've continued to gain weight model after model as more safety systems are engineered into them as well as stiffer safer (heavier) chassis's.
The latest 3 and 5 series BMW's were lighter than the previous models, but it required huge amounts of alloy panels and suspension components to do it, which all add significantly to costs.

I remember hearing somewhere the VE may have plastic guards to save weight.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-11-2005, 07:27 PM   #8
Psycho Chicken
Banned
 
Psycho Chicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South East Melbourne
Posts: 6,156
Default

Ahem. XD Falcon vs VB Commo. One was a crap load bigger. It also had better economy.

I saw the cover of Wheels, it's a bloody Vectra! I really don't think it's the VE, though time will tell.
Psycho Chicken is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-11-2005, 09:46 PM   #9
T3ts50
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
T3ts50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,094
Default

Holden always give previews of their next car in their concepts for example the Cross 8 before the VY came out.. I think wheels have got it nearly spot on, before the VY came out they had artist impressions which looked exactly the same as the VY. It looks pretty much like a bigger torana.
T3ts50 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-11-2005, 10:14 PM   #10
Fairlane
V8 Powaah
 
Fairlane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
Posts: 1,994
Default

I can't see how the VE could be lighter than the VZ in any way at all. Whilst I think wheels has got the styling right (not that i like, not enough glass for me), ill wager that the VE will be nearing 1700kg possibly more. Really the VE (and the zeta platform) has to be aiming for a 5 star NCAP rating this comined with the more advanced IRS and all the new elecotrnic gizmo's i cant see it being lighter than the VZ.

That being said, ill probably bet that it will be lighter than the BF.
__________________
FG G6E Turbo- Seduce & Cashmere - Sold


XF S pack Sedan- AU 302 Windsor, T5, 2.77 LSD, Many Mods
Fairlane is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-11-2005, 10:16 PM   #11
MAD
Petro-sexual
 
MAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
Holden have had the option of designing weight out of them due to it being a clean sheet design, Ford didn't have that option with the BA upgrade as they were stuck with an existing platform.
True that ford had a platform to work from but there was a lot of extra weight added due to the fact the chassis was made 88% stiffer than the AU, which was for both handling and extra body rigidity for safety.
__________________
EL Fairmont Ghia - Manual - Supercharged
- The Story
MAD is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-11-2005, 12:43 AM   #12
gtfpv
GT
 
gtfpv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
Default

mate i read in a mag that it is rumoured to have carbon fiber fromt gaurds.so thier . obviously effort going into wieght reduction.
gtfpv is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-11-2005, 12:46 AM   #13
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

I wouldn't be too fussed about comparing the VE to the BF. The BF is at the end of its generation, much like EL was when the VT came out etc.

There will be an all-new Falcon in 2008, new generation, starting with a clean-sheet. I'll bet that will give Ford a chance to address the BA/BF's main issues, one of them being excessive weight. We'll see what happens then.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-11-2005, 10:51 AM   #14
dddd
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 109
Default

I think you should read the article again , it does not say lighter than vz.
dddd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-11-2005, 10:54 AM   #15
zetec
Zoom Zoom
 
zetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,352
Default

I'm also surprised nobody has mentioned the IRS expected to weigh down the bum somewhat, the first thing on their menb should be turfing out the aged multilink rubbish in there now. That should lead to a weight increase from a more complex rear IRS.
__________________
2012 Mazda3 MPS
zetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-11-2005, 11:12 AM   #16
MADDER
FF.com.au SAAB Driver
 
MADDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 209
Default

I, for one, am doing my bit to redesign VE bits at the tooling stage, discreetly adding weight wherever possible. I wanna see a heavy pig of a Commie.

Praise the Lard!
__________________
Then = 2003 XR8 Ute with Performance Brakes

Now = 2006 SAAB 9-3 SportCombi with Heated Seats
MADDER is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-11-2005, 11:52 AM   #17
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dddd
I think you should read the article again , it does not say lighter than vz.
On one of the photos it has a caption that says smaller and lighter.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-11-2005, 12:26 PM   #18
Ghiadude
FORMERLY TX3DUDE
 
Ghiadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: "THE GONG"
Posts: 2,487
Default

I said it before and ill say it again... the torana IS VE commo....look for a car that doesnt weigh more than VZ but has more in it....5.3l engine is my other less likely crystal ball item...MARK MY WORDS!!! it will NOT be much heavier than VZ
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by AL NZ
it wouldn't matter what FPV or FordOz call it, because it will be - The One.
Ghiadude is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-11-2005, 12:38 PM   #19
XplosiveR6
Viper FG XR6 Turbo
 
XplosiveR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 858
Default

does this mean that holden are going back to the medium car days like back in the 1980's? thats a deathwish, look how much touble that got holden into back then. Might mean falcon will be the only family sized australian car again.
XplosiveR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-11-2005, 01:43 PM   #20
Lukeyson
Right out sideways
 
Lukeyson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Coffs Harbour NSW
Posts: 5,305
Default

pffff wheels, did you see in the back where they review past issues, and they showed the cover of a 95 wheels mag, showing their prediction of the VT ?
__________________
2010 FG XR50 Turbo | 2007 FPV BFII GT, BOSS 302
Lukeyson is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-11-2005, 02:23 PM   #21
bathurst77
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,098
Default

The computer versions are pretty poor renditions.
Check out the door opening shape and C pillar in the main pic on page 18 (nice slim striaght pilar nicely shaped door and rear quater window)
and and compare to the actual camo pic belw it. Fat fillar almost straight door opening, wide metala round the curvey door, more liek current commy.
Same with the bottom of A pillar and bonnet jion. The computer version looks heaps beter then theactual camoflage car.
bathurst77 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-11-2005, 02:48 PM   #22
smoo
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
smoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EF_Dave
does this mean that holden are going back to the medium car days like back in the 1980's? thats a deathwish, look how much touble that got holden into back then. Might mean falcon will be the only family sized australian car again.
Might not be bad news for Holden considering large car sales aren't the greatest, and they wont be getting any better if gas prices go up again.

Does anyone have some scans?
smoo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-11-2005, 02:58 PM   #23
dddd
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
On one of the photos it has a caption that says smaller and lighter.
Smaller and lighter than the statesman they are currently putting the 2.8 v6 in for export
dddd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-11-2005, 12:06 AM   #24
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dddd
Smaller and lighter than the statesman they are currently putting the 2.8 v6 in for export
You may be right.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-11-2005, 12:09 AM   #25
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bathurst77
The computer versions are pretty poor renditions.
Check out the door opening shape and C pillar in the main pic on page 18 (nice slim striaght pilar nicely shaped door and rear quater window)
and and compare to the actual camo pic belw it. Fat fillar almost straight door opening, wide metala round the curvey door, more liek current commy.
Same with the bottom of A pillar and bonnet jion. The computer version looks heaps beter then theactual camoflage car.
I hate the way they go on about how good it looks in the article, for fcks sake they haven't even seen what it will really look like yet, its only a few crappy computer renderings. To me it looks like a ripoff of a Vectra with the rear end of the Subaru Liberty. Dull.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL