|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
15-12-2014, 10:12 PM | #1 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Perth
Posts: 47
|
Hey, has anyone re-mapped the ECU on a non-turbo Fiesta?
Cheers Bargey |
||
15-12-2014, 10:43 PM | #2 | ||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,547
|
I think Herrod Motorsport was looking into it back when I first got my WS in 2009, might only be worth doing if you want to do the full exhaust too, so you get some sort of decent gain out of it.
Mountune in the UK does off the shelf performance parts for them too if you are interested. |
||
16-12-2014, 12:36 PM | #3 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Perth
Posts: 47
|
I have had a CAT back 2" system fitted with flow though mufflers. I also fitted a K&N cold air intake. I noticed a slight (and I do mean slight) difference when I fitted the exhaust, but not really anything when I added the air intake 2 weeks later.
The fuel economy is still really good, averaging 5.8l/100 with a 60/40 freeway - stuck in traffic 102 km round trip everyday. I have noticed the fuel consumption dropped from .8 l/hour down to .7 @ idle when warmed up. The first thing I noticed when I did the exhaust (and I don't want to start anything here) is the shudder in the auto disappeared. I know they are not related, I just saying what I noticed. I'll check out the Mountune site. |
||
This user likes this post: |
18-12-2014, 06:49 AM | #4 | ||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,547
|
Thats pretty good fuel economy, mines a WS CL manual with the 1.6L and I couldn't get mine under 6.3L/100km with mostly 100km/h highway driving, but its 100% stock.
|
||
19-12-2014, 03:31 PM | #5 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Perth
Posts: 47
|
I pretty much have had the same fuel economy since day one (before I added the exhaust and intake). I do drive like Miss Daisy, mostly off the cruise control because WA is a Police State, and a standard auto Fiesta doesn't really inspire the boy racer in me. I have mapped drives on tanks of 91, 95, 98 octane. I only drive on 98 oct now. I get about 60/70 kms more out of the tank with 98. The car drives better, is a little more responsive, and extra km's does go some way to offset the high fuel prices in the West
|
||
This user likes this post: |