Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-07-2017, 03:17 PM   #1
amiers
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 976
Default 5.0 coyote question

The new Mustang has 306 kw standard, the Tickford Mustang has 360 kw with an exhaust, cai and tune. why did we need a supercharger to get 345/351 kw?
__________________
2018 Mustang GT
amiers is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-07-2017, 03:23 PM   #2
bangm001
Mopar! But Own F6's..
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: F6DELAIDE
Posts: 3,213
Default Re: 5.0 coyote question

Emmisions compliance, ADR compliance etc etc is my guess??
__________________
F6 TYPHOON
FPV 335 GT
bangm001 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-07-2017, 03:46 PM   #3
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default Re: 5.0 coyote question

Because it's much more than they quoted. And the Tickford one doesn't comply with Ford's ADR compliance.

And the Miami was detuned to keep the driveline from blowing up. Not to mention body flex stress cracks that showed up in the intercooled GT-H version.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 26-07-2017, 04:02 PM   #4
PooDog
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
PooDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: nz
Posts: 1,871
Default Re: 5.0 coyote question

Have a look where the torque peak is in the rev range and how broad it is ....usually tells the story
__________________
Fgx xr8 winter white manual, gone but not forgotten
22 mitsubishi outlander XLS PHEV

Au11 fairmont Ghia ported gt40p heads ,comp springs and locks
Xe 264 cam,custom intake,pacemaker tri y headers
524nm torque

19 Triton GSXR manual
PooDog is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-07-2017, 05:58 PM   #5
DFB FGXR6
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
DFB FGXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,678
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For the excellent car-care guide 
Default Re: 5.0 coyote question

Quote:
Originally Posted by muzman View Post
Have a look where the torque peak is in the rev range and how broad it is ....usually tells the story
This!

Having both in my garage, the Mustang 5.0 is a completely different beast compared to the Miami. The Mustang need revs to perform as apposed to the Miami which just HAMMERS from idle to red line.

I suppose FPV had experienced 8 years of complaints about the 5.4 Boss lacking low rev torque and decided that another N/A engine was only going lead then down the same path. Hence the mighty Miami.
__________________
PX MK II Ranger
FG XR6
FG X XR8
Mustang GT

T3 TS50 - gone but not forgotten
DFB FGXR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
6 users like this post:
Old 26-07-2017, 06:26 PM   #6
stazza
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
stazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,422
Default Re: 5.0 coyote question

Plus the mustang is lighter.

There's an old issue of Motor magazine at work in the crib hut and it's dated from around the time the 5.0 GT and GS were released. It had an interview with the head guru from Prodrive stating that A) the Falcon is heavier than the Mustang and B) emissions requirements would have made the Coyote more underwhelming in a Falcon than the outgoing 5.4(even though I don't get the hate for the 5.4, I thought my Boss 290 XR8 went great compared to a mates VE SS).

So there's your answer.
__________________
2011 SILHOUETTE FPV GS 315 #0275
20x10", 20x8.5" Lenso D1R's
Pedders XA Coilovers
Brembo 4/1
Pacemaker 1" 7/8 Headers
Twin 3" Stainless Manta Catback
XFT Built Motor
XFT Custom Surge Tank
XFT Stage 3 ZF
Final Drive Chromoly Tailshaft
KPM Twin Air Filter
KPM Stage 2 Intercooler
KPM Twin Throttle Body
2.6L Kenne Bell on E85
BlueStreak Circle D Converter
900+ rwhp thanks to Xtreme Ford Tuning
stazza is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 26-07-2017, 07:13 PM   #7
XD 351 Ute
Excessive Fuel Ingestion
 
XD 351 Ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Queensland Coast
Posts: 1,586
Default Re: 5.0 coyote question

Because we needed a factory supercharged V8!

Ed
__________________
Recommended Forum Traders: RSGerry, trimmaster, 51OAU, EB-92, adxr8, my67xr, RG, ZA-289, kruptor, gassa, Felony, RNXR, Rhino 351, Anchor, Smoke Pursuit, Mr. FPV (through E-Bay),
XD 351 Ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
4 users like this post:
Old 26-07-2017, 10:19 PM   #8
shyun
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 95
Default Re: 5.0 coyote question

I believe whatever PCM in the Falcon used wasn't able to run the TiVCT. Wouldn't end up being much better than a 5.4 anchor.
__________________
ED XR6, LeMans Red, 5-Speed
AUII XR8, Silhouette, 5-Speed
shyun is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL