|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-06-2019, 01:05 AM | #1 | ||
Starter Motor
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 14
|
Hi, the design of the inlet manifold on the FG, Barra 195 motor looks to be much more efficient than the BA/BF.
After all, the BA/BF inlet manifold actually started life all the way back in the AU or maybe the EF/EL days didn't it? on the FG inlet manifold, the shorter air pipe path from the air box to the throttle body and shorter pipes to the head all look great so I was wondering if one could be fitted and work on a BF engine. They can be bought 2nd hand with the injectors and fuel rail plus throttle body on E bay pretty cheap. I have no doubt one would bolt on, but what about the wiring and vacuum hoses etc, would the BF wiring connectors and hoses match. The injectors should be OK because they should just plug in to the existing BF injector plugs. Perhaps the BF throttle body could retro fit onto the FG inlet manifold if the FG one wouldn't work or the wiring harness didn't suit But all of that said, if the FG inlet manifold and injectors and throttle body could fit and work, would there be any benefit over the BA/BF inlet manifold eg increased efficiencies such as throttle response? increase in Power & Torque and maybe better fuel economy? Would anyone have a comment, or maybe someone has already done this or has had some experience? Last edited by Franks; 08-06-2019 at 01:12 AM. |
||
08-06-2019, 02:14 AM | #2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 700
|
|
||
08-06-2019, 12:34 PM | #3 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 179
|
I always though the move to the plastic manifold was for cheaper cost and lighter weight and not so much for performance.
It does have the dual short and long runner system control through vacuum manual tuning valve but you would have to have feature linked into your ECC to take advantage of it. I would have thought the best advantage of this manifold would be to get the LPI version if you want to run LPG only. |
||
08-06-2019, 08:56 PM | #4 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 820
|
They give a good boost but they work fundamentally different to the broadband manifold.
|
||