![]() |
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | ||
If it ain't broke........
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld
Posts: 18,524
|
__________________
Visitors welcome Relatives by appointment only |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Donating Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Morayfield
Posts: 27,894
|
Pay it back.
__________________
I love Holdens.... |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Experienced Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australasia
Posts: 7,535
|
Morally she should but Govco authorities will not force her to do so, also civil law case will be useless.
Just proves how many conniving women at there who has done this as this is not the first time.. Last edited by Itsme; 07-12-2022 at 10:42 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
IT Drone from Sector 7G
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Macedon Ranges, Victoria
Posts: 21,964
|
The only 'good' thing here is that the kid lived and died knowing he had a loving dad.
...pretty sure the dad would also feel this way. Nothing will result of this except a media and internet pile-on... |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Taromeo
Posts: 10,446
|
She should be made to pay it back and also charged with gaining money under false pretences.
Something has to be done to try to stop these women in their tracks. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
BLUE OVAL INC.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,645
|
I wouldnt want the money back, kjust knowing that I'd contributed to raising the boy would be reward enough regardless of Paternity.
She should be charged with fraud though, if she's sleeping with enough men to not know who's Fathered her child thdn it should be on her to clarify that to avoid this. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,045
|
I disagree with the last paragraph, that he wouldnt be successful in court. I recall a previous similar case, where the not-father was not awarded compensation, but largely because the kids were still kids and the financial impost on the mother would affect the kids.
In this case, the kid is not only grown, but isnt even in the picture. No reason he cant be award compensation, frankly who cares what effect that has on her. Of course, he has to be able to prove that she knowingly deceived him, she could just say she only started to have doubts about the paternity when the kid was grown, if at all. All the more reason for paternity testing to be a prerequisite for the dad being named on the birth certificate. People just cant be trusted. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
This user likes this post: |
![]() |
#8 | ||
DIY Tragic
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sydney, more than not. I hate it.
Posts: 21,827
|
The deceased had a half-brother, where paternity (the previously cuckolded father) is not in dispute. Why would anyone pursue a process that furthers animosity between the parents of this child - it’s a messy one, for sure.
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
This user likes this post: |
![]() |
#9 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Goulburn NSW
Posts: 506
|
Hi Guy's
I wouldnt hold my breath on trying to get the money back from that women. Apart from taking her to court over this matter. She should be charged after it was proved that the gentleman was not the real father and he was still paying for what he believed was his son. She should be charged with fraud. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 1,717
|
Pretty good world we live in where a parent can forced to pay unpaid child support, yet isn’t entitled to money back if the child isn’t theirs.
In cases of child support, how is a DNA test not standard practice? It’s not an invasive thing on the child at all. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,602
|
Quote:
Most men if their partner tells them "I'm pregnant" - unless she follows it up with information about another man, the assumption is it is his and he doesn't question it, unless there's good reason to suspect infidelity. If a woman has had sex with more than 1 man around the time of conception, she knows it isn't 100% his without a test. She owes it to the child at least to know for sure. Why do they do it? The guy with the good job is a better mark than the guy she hooked up with on Tinder and women don't want that "choice" taken away from them.
__________________
Quote:
|
||||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |