|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
25-07-2006, 01:42 PM | #1 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 604
|
Hi all,
Can any one tell me if the hole for a Shaker is off-set to the right to allow for engine torque,or not? thanks |
||
25-07-2006, 03:14 PM | #2 | ||
fat289
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wagga NSW
Posts: 671
|
to put it simply
no
__________________
I'm just having a great Falcon time , thanks for asking dumba$$ XRGT XP ute 351w Toploader 99 Springer softail XW Fairmont 302w / c4 col shift 58,000 miles |
||
25-07-2006, 03:39 PM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
|
Noosacuda: Only Chrysler liked offsetting engines (V8 K-frame), inclining engines (slant6) etc, etc. Probably the shaker hoods on 440RB/426Hemi cars are offset to allow for engine torque that only Mopar V8s can produce? :
|
||
25-07-2006, 04:59 PM | #4 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 604
|
Thanks.I just didn't want the shaker to hit the sides because of motor moving. (mmmm....426!)
I knew of a 440 6 pak,4 speed in a VC wagon,the torque did wonderful things to the floor,A and B pillars! |
||