|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-09-2006, 09:24 AM | #1 | ||
FF.com.au SAAB Driver
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 209
|
Press release on Next Car.
LINK HERE 1st September, 2006 Ford Motor Company announced overnight it has begun the process of exploring strategic options for Aston Martin, with particular emphasis on a potential sale of all or a portion of the unit. "As part of our ongoing strategic review, we have determined that Aston Martin may be an attractive opportunity to raise capital and generate value," said Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Bill Ford. "Aston Martin Lagonda has flourished under Ford ownership, which is why we believe it is prudent to consider a sale of all or part of this prized brand. Since Aston Martin's dealer network, product architecture and size are distinctly different from other Ford brands, it is the most logical and capital-smart divestiture choice. The objective of any sale would be to position Aston Martin within a structure and resource base sufficient to allow it to reach its full potential, while enabling Ford to efficiently raise capital for its other brands." Mr. Ford added, "Regarding our other Premier Automotive Group brands, we've made no decisions, as our review of strategic alternatives continues. However, we continue to be encouraged by Jaguar's progress and by the strength and consumer appeal of the Jaguar, Land Rover and Volvo product lineups." The company said there can be no assurance that the decision to explore strategic options for Aston Martin will result in any transaction, which would be subject to Board approval. Ford Motor Company, a global automotive industry leader based in Dearborn (suburban Detroit), Michigan, manufactures and distributes cars and trucks in 200 markets across six continents. With about 300,000 employees and more than 100 plants worldwide, the company's core and affiliated automotive brands include Aston Martin, Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, Lincoln, Mazda, Mercury and Volvo.
__________________
Then = 2003 XR8 Ute with Performance Brakes Now = 2006 SAAB 9-3 SportCombi with Heated Seats |
||
01-09-2006, 09:41 AM | #2 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,587
|
That would be a huge mistake IMO. Isn't Aston about the only PAG company actually selling reasonable amounts?
Id almost get rid of jag before aston. (no I dont know what the UK sales are like)
__________________
|
||
01-09-2006, 11:44 AM | #3 | |||
ZX-6R & Falcon pilot
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where there's no water restrictions
Posts: 562
|
Quote:
However, as strange as that may seem, that only makes it even more likely to be sold off, as a profit making business can be sold for a lot more than a loss-making one. Personally, I hope Ford hangs onto Aston and offloads Land Rover and Jaguar, but who knows - FoMoCo hasn't got to where they are now by making GOOD business decisions.
__________________
Cheap, Fast, RELIABLE. You can only have two. |
|||
01-09-2006, 12:05 PM | #4 | ||
7,753
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tasmania..... Moderator: Tas FPV club
Posts: 5,128
|
Thats disappointing
__________________
BREAKING NEWS: The Pity Train has just derailed at the intersection of "Suck It Up & Move On" after it crashed into "We All Have Problems" before coming to a complete stop at "Get the Hell Over It." Reporting LIVE from Quitchur Bitchin' |
||
01-09-2006, 12:11 PM | #5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: QLD - Townsville
Posts: 1,772
|
NOOO sell all of jag before even considering Aston Martin...
this is a sad day in Ford history... :(
__________________
My Cars: 2002 Ford Falcon AU S3 SR 2006 BF MKI Falcon XR6 2008 Mazda BT50 SDX 2004 BA XR8 ute 2006 AUDI A4 B7 2013 FG II XR6 Ute 2006 Ford Territory TX 2003 Ford Falcon XR8 2009 Territory Turbo Ghia Current: 2012 Audi A4 B8 2.0T Quattro |
||
01-09-2006, 12:16 PM | #6 | ||
Guy that posts stuff
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 553
|
Selling off Jaguar makes more sense.
Ford already has several brands that fight with Jaguar. Land Rover, Volvo, Lincon. Jaguar seems to be a endless hole for money. But yeh, it looks like Fords pretty desperate for cash. Aston would be desireable to many brands. |
||
01-09-2006, 12:45 PM | #7 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,301
|
I think Nasser's original strategy of being in all segments of the market place was a sound one. However, Jaguar is a problem and to a lesser extent Land Rover. The labour costs in the UK are horrendous and that will always put them behind the eight ball.
Now if they could successfully transplant as BMW and Mercedes have, with factories either in low cost countries or close to the market thus reducing logistics costs, well they'd have a chance. People after a luxury or exclusive car will always pay that little bit more, as long as the cars are good. Aston Martin should be a very good proposition now that they have cars worth buying. Having said all that, it's a crying shame that Lincoln and Mercury are withering on the vine. Ford really needs to concentrate on their “Home Brands”. Especially in a market that is as fragmented as the USA’s. With so many segments available, there are opportunities to utilise a single platform across a range of segments and a range of price levels. (Think Camry, which underpins RAV4, Kluger/Highlander, Lexus RX, Lexus ES and some other vehicles) It’s time to stop concentrating on working harder and start working smarter. I heard a story that Toyota has only three seat designs across its entire range. Ford had dozens and GM has Hundreds! I don’t know if its true, but it highlights what I’m getting at. |
||
01-09-2006, 07:01 PM | #8 | |||
HSV - I just ate one!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of nowhere
Posts: 3,188
|
Quote:
|
|||
01-09-2006, 07:44 PM | #9 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 79
|
If what I read elsewhere is correct Ford will have to bundle aston with Jag to be able to get rid of Jag. Jaguar on its own would be hard to sell.
|
||
02-09-2006, 11:44 AM | #10 | ||
Ute Forum Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 7,227
|
This reminds me of Chrysler having to sell off all its overseas interests to get a rescue package from the US govt. This isn't quite at that stage of course but the current situation surely cannot be sustainable.
|
||
02-09-2006, 04:23 PM | #11 | ||
Automotive Designer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 751
|
I hope Ford can find another way to get round their problems without having to sell Aston Martin. What happens if Ford sell off both AM and Jaguar? - does this impact on Ford's bargaining power to get the 6speed ZF auto in our Falcon?
Again I hope not. |
||
02-09-2006, 05:59 PM | #12 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,094
|
They should keep both so they can use future technologies on them as a testing ground. Then filter that technology through to the other cars such as Volvo, Land rover and finally ford. This would or should cut devolopment dollars in the future as they would have already been tested.
Ferrari and Maserati used to do this before their big divorce. |
||
03-09-2006, 02:35 PM | #13 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 105
|
I believe the jag is the only loss making brand in pag, landrover sells well and volvo turns a small profit and aston only just makes a profit. It's just that jag makes a big loss, x-type was a disappointment, s-type not much better. I reakon the new xj will help heaps. Ford needs to keep pag the technology they use in these vehicle is passed down to other brands, and they can charge s**tloads for these brands, helps cover r/d. PAG will sort itself out soon, it's Ford north america that needs a kick up the a**, sucking up all money from profits made every where else in the world!!
|
||
03-09-2006, 02:48 PM | #14 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 703
|
Somemore
Quote:
|
|||