|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-12-2021, 07:07 PM | #451 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 140
|
Like when you go from a Toyota Prado to a 200 series Landcrusier, it feels so much bigger inside and it’s only a small difference in width. Makes a huge difference to people with a family of kids
|
||
11-12-2021, 08:35 AM | #452 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,349
|
Quote:
It’s really hard for the mainstream manufacturers because they want to sell both mid sized and full sized pickups the truth is probably that a suitably widened Ranger covers most needs in international markets. I am cautious that a 50mm increase in track does not automatically translate to a 50mm wider vehicle or an extra 50mm wider hip and shoulder room but I hope it does…. The important part with that is NG Ranger’s squarer body and more filled out look gives me hope… Last edited by jpd80; 11-12-2021 at 08:41 AM. |
|||
11-12-2021, 11:20 AM | #453 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,001
|
Arnt the doors carry over? That would mean the cabin width is unchanged?
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170 2004 BA wagon RTV project. 1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red 1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired 1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project. |
||
11-12-2021, 11:53 AM | #454 | ||
PURSUIT 250
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sydney
Posts: 5,829
|
|
||
11-12-2021, 12:06 PM | #455 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,001
|
Doors look very similar to me
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...NzRWA&usqp=CAU https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...u1plg&usqp=CAU
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170 2004 BA wagon RTV project. 1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red 1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired 1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project. |
||
11-12-2021, 01:21 PM | #456 | ||
GT4.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,218
|
The entire roof, glasshouse and door frames are carryover no matter what Ford marketing spins about them all having “different part numbers”. They were even gracious enough to release a press photo of the new one parked in exactly the same position as the old one. Take note of the panel gap where A pillar meets the front guard near the mirror and also the hipline above the rear door handle on the c pillar. Personally I’m surprised that the haters haven’t picked this and run with it. Do I think it’s nice? Well, it’s not bad looking, but I hate the fact that it’s been made to look like a big, dumb American truck. My next work vehicle will probably be a base New Defender 90 with steelies, because I’m sure the V6 Wiltrak will be up at $75k now. |
||
11-12-2021, 01:22 PM | #457 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melb.
Posts: 4,465
|
Quote:
|
|||
11-12-2021, 02:03 PM | #458 | |||
Former BTIKD
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sunny Downtown Wagga Wagga. NSW.
Posts: 53,197
|
Quote:
__________________
Dying at your job is natures way of saying that you're in the wrong line of work.
|
|||
11-12-2021, 02:10 PM | #459 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,001
|
So word is the Raptor gets the 3L Ecoboost.
Power wise we're basically looking at an FG turbo. Should be good, competitors have nothing in comparison. This will be like Holden in 1999 with the LS1. Same engine in the Explorer runs high 13s, Ranger being heavier probably do mid 14s. Much quicker than all the dual cabs at the moment which struggle to do 17s.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170 2004 BA wagon RTV project. 1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red 1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired 1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project. Last edited by XR Martin; 11-12-2021 at 02:20 PM. |
||
11-12-2021, 02:27 PM | #460 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,349
|
Quote:
forward by 50mm and yet both those picture still look amazingly similar in the areas you pointed out (lower front guard meeting front door). Looking closer, the wheel arches on the PX3 have been replaced by a squarer outcrop on the front guard, I’m looking at where that meets the door, does that mean the door is out further or is that an optical illusion? (Similarly, back door where it meets the tray….) Last edited by jpd80; 11-12-2021 at 02:48 PM. |
|||
11-12-2021, 04:02 PM | #461 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,349
|
When you say that the front screen is squarer, does that mean the roof is slightly wider?
Because it looks a littler wider to me although I’m often wrong about these things…. Also, tumblehome looks slightly less…. |
||
11-12-2021, 04:21 PM | #462 | |||
Donating Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,820
|
Quote:
Regardless I know the current Ranger has a single piece door skin, and a single piece door inner ( integrated with the window frame ). Seperate frames went out a long time ago. There is no way those assemblies are carry over into the new Ranger (looking at those pictures above). I’ll take the Ford ‘spin’ as worth listening to on this particular subject. |
|||
This user likes this post: |
11-12-2021, 04:24 PM | #463 | |||
Donating Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,820
|
Quote:
|
|||
11-12-2021, 04:43 PM | #464 | ||
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,736
|
|
||
11-12-2021, 05:43 PM | #465 | ||
Donating Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,634
|
I was thinking more $79,990 to $84,990.
__________________
PX MK II Ranger FG XR6 FG X XR8 Mustang GT T3 TS50 - gone but not forgotten |
||
2 users like this post: |
11-12-2021, 07:58 PM | #466 | |||||
GT4.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,218
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
11-12-2021, 08:03 PM | #467 | ||
GT4.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,218
|
Further to this, I ask you - If Ford changed the glasshouse and roof and door frames, why would they make them look near identical? Why also would the engineer give sideways answers like “the part numbers are different” if they had nothing to conceal? Wouldn’t they flat out say that no, it’s a completely new design and any similarities are just coincidence?
The car looks fine and I’m sure it’s great but don’t try to tell me flat out that those windows and roof line aren’t the same. Ford have a long history of ALL NEW models with reused bits from old ones, FG falcon Ute tail gate for example with US Explorer tail light units, XH falcon utes with side stamped panels from the 70’s etc etc. They love it. |
||
11-12-2021, 08:32 PM | #468 | ||
PURSUIT 250
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sydney
Posts: 5,829
|
I really hope the cabin is a bit wider. I drone my px2 ranger today and couldn’t wait to get out of it. Seats are atrocious and the ergonomics are not much better. I hope VW bring their knowledge of how to lay out a car interior
If the deliver the same shortcuts as the current I’ll buy the last of the current amarok |
||
11-12-2021, 08:51 PM | #469 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,349
|
Never mind……
One look at the two vehicles side by side will confirm that they are very different unless you’re blind Freddie Rest assured that everyone will be crawling over the new Ranger, nothing is the same… Last edited by jpd80; 11-12-2021 at 08:59 PM. |
||
11-12-2021, 09:06 PM | #470 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,349
|
Quote:
|
|||
This user likes this post: |
11-12-2021, 09:45 PM | #471 | |||
PURSUIT 250
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sydney
Posts: 5,829
|
Quote:
Vw had input in their version. And on their renderings you can also see differences to the ranger They also had engineers there for 2 years so I’m sure they would have pushed ford on some items |
|||
11-12-2021, 10:47 PM | #472 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,349
|
Quote:
It’s basically a badge engineered Ranger…. |
|||
11-12-2021, 11:53 PM | #473 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
|
Quote:
|
|||
12-12-2021, 06:00 AM | #474 | ||
Donating Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,820
|
|
||
12-12-2021, 06:37 AM | #475 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,349
|
I suspect that was an imprecise response to Raptor getting 3L Ecoboost…..That now seems very unlikely.
I’m happy in the knowledge that Ranger is getting right engines in the main product areas: 2.0 single scroll base engine with manual and 6-speed automatic 2.0 Twin scroll mid level engine in manual and 10-speed automatic 3.0 V6 Powerstroke option on trim levels with 10-speed automatic only The question is whether the Raptor will come with a different tune for more power, the privileged few already know the answer but I have a feeling that little hints will start appearing as we get closer to the reveal….. Perhaps someone can take us on a journey from what we already know to the unknown……. Last edited by jpd80; 12-12-2021 at 06:59 AM. |
||
12-12-2021, 08:22 AM | #476 | ||
PURSUIT 250
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sydney
Posts: 5,829
|
|
||
12-12-2021, 08:46 AM | #477 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,349
|
No, just a big mouth that no insider will ever trust again.
Im happy to know a few things that others share on the forum, if you follow closely, you’ll pick things up from certain posters….. Sometimes I have to bite my tongue really hard when posters (not you) start arguing with people (not me) they assume know nothing…. Last edited by jpd80; 12-12-2021 at 08:55 AM. |
||
3 users like this post: |
12-12-2021, 09:47 AM | #478 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
|
Quote:
And not in your list |
|||
12-12-2021, 09:49 AM | #479 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
|
Good to see you're still around John, a familiar face (ID). I haven't been online here since our aus product ceased manufacture, perhaps even well before that!
Thought id drop in and see whats happening |
||
12-12-2021, 10:28 AM | #480 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,696
|
I predict the 2.7 ecoboost V6 will go in the Raptor.
I base this on it’s specs and previous applications. I don’t think they would stick the 450 horsepower 3.5 in it as I think they would want to separate it from the F-150 Raptor. In the F150 the 2.7 puts out 242kw and 542nm which would go ok. The 3.5 in the F-150 Raptor puts out 336kw and 691nm. This tune would make it a total bad ****. It is possible we could see a 3.5 with a tune around 290-300kw and 550-600nm. It’s a mouth watering prospect at the same engine in the GT makes north of 600HP and weighs about 200kg. |
||