|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
30-06-2012, 11:24 AM | #31 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 316
|
Quote:
I've heard the statement you made a thousand times by volunteers and the fact of the matter is, its an old wives tale and it's totally untrue. ESO drivers are not by default "guilty" of anything just because they are driving an emergency or police vehicle. Even when driving under emergency conditions (evoking RR 305/306 in Victoria) they aren't automatically in the wrong if something happens. |
|||
30-06-2012, 01:40 PM | #32 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 642
|
yep, you know it.
perhaps you call the various unions around the country and tell them that too, as it would help greatly with all the criminal charges that are pending with drivers at the moment. good luck. |
||
30-06-2012, 02:54 PM | #33 | ||
The Vengeful One
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tazzy
Posts: 12,765
|
Ooo bugger!!!!
__________________
|
||
30-06-2012, 04:12 PM | #34 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 316
|
Quote:
All I'm saying is that the "always at fault" concept is a myth that, in my experience, is perpetuated by word of mouth and innuendo rather than a good understanding of how the legal system works. In relation to this specific example - if the news article is taken as 100% factual (which I conceed we don't know exactly what happened), if this guy simply pulled straight out in front of the police car who had nowhere to go, then your statement that the "copper is in trouble regardless of who actually caused the accident" is absolute nonsense. |
|||