|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-05-2005, 03:18 AM | #31 | ||
Donating Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,383
|
All the wise cracks and having a go at them, there is a lot of truth to what they say. I dont think branding them all as wastes of space is either fair or necessary. A lot of them DO lead by example, spending a lot of money on efficient cars, water saving house devices and even cycle/walk to places. I think remarks here should be more directed at how we can justify such a tax, ie alternatives. Just calling them all Greenies will not solve the problem for either side. There is a lot of truth to what they say, we do need to help the environment..
__________________
My Ford Family... 2014 GT-F, Manual, Kinetic with Black Stripes 2021 Mustang Mach 1, Manual, Velocity Blue |
||
07-05-2005, 10:49 PM | #32 | ||
Former E-Series Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,733
|
Before bringing up these time-wasting and pointless ideas, the government might want to think about their half-arsed stance on the whole issue. Until recently they were giving huge import duty concessions to 4WD wagons, whilst giving nothing of the sort to hybrid-electric, diesel or other highly efficient passenger cars.
How many government fleet cars are on LPG? What effort did the government put into making Holden's Ecommodore concept a reality? How eager are they to lead the world in terms of hydrogen commercialisation? It seems they like having their little earner from all the large vehicles filling up on finite petrol supplies and filling their coffers with the taxes. This is no different to the Bracks government's view on road safety, where the emphasis is generally on using it as an excuse to rob the average man of more dollars, rather than implementing real solutions. It's just one disgrace after another. Last edited by ilsautomotive; 07-05-2005 at 10:50 PM. |
||
08-05-2005, 02:42 AM | #33 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
|
there are better fuels out there that we could be using but the oil companies wouldnt make as much profit ,thats why where using carcinogenic unleaded, the goverment doesent care because they get more than 50 percent tax for every litre we buy,ala GST....and they will never care if we pay more ,lpg is cleaner and has a good octane rating will work fine in perfomance application, we could be fueling our cars for a qaurter the price, as for the greenies trees still need to be cut down so they can wipe there bums as well
|
||
09-05-2005, 09:13 AM | #34 | |||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
thats how i look at it. A properly looked after falcon or commodore is going to use less fuel than a small car revving its tits off to move anywhere. As for these greenies they can suck balls. How about these 10 - 15 yr old poorly buit rubish buckets that have not had a service in the same amount of time !!! |
|||