|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-01-2015, 09:38 PM | #31 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 222
|
WW1
Gallipoli was a major blunder. The British generals pretty much sent those men straight into a slaughter house. WW2 Nazi Germany's Operation Barbarossa was a major stuff up. Hitler had enough on his plate, he should of kept with the non aggression pact, finished off the UK and Africa and then focused on the US with Japan. Soviets should have been the last thing he dealt with. |
||
09-01-2015, 11:58 PM | #32 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,434
|
I'm glad Hitler didn't succeed and also the Soviets. My grandparents were war refugees from Hungary and barely made it into Austria and then onto Australia.
By far and large it seems the Iraq campaign was the worst in modern times. And it seems likely that we may end up there again, though no commitment has been made but only so much can be achieved by airstrikes. |
||
This user likes this post: |
10-01-2015, 02:46 AM | #33 | ||
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,886
|
You think?
Last edited by GasoLane; 10-01-2015 at 09:32 AM. Reason: Try replying without snide comments. |
||
10-01-2015, 07:57 AM | #34 | ||
Next upgraded Mk1 Leopard
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, in the burbs
Posts: 4,913
|
I am assuming that we are only talking about poor military decisions and not any form of ideology (for me that would be a separate discussion).
Looking at Chinese history lots of turns and twists there, I also think Custer's dislike of Gatling guns was a poor decision, Little big horn with Gatling guns would have been different. UK Just my thoughts
__________________
Plastic Surgery 1 AUII Monsoon Blue How 2's: Change rear view mirror, Install backfire valve, Change foam front seats, Install auto transmission cooler, Replace Trans Shift Globe, Remove front door Trim, Paint AU headlights, install door spears, Premium Rear Parcel Shelf, go here...
|
||
This user likes this post: |
10-01-2015, 08:12 AM | #35 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,811
|
Quote:
The Gatling gun would have been a major game changer. One has to wonder why Custer saw fit not to use them... |
|||
10-01-2015, 09:59 AM | #36 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,318
|
I wondered that too. Could be that he wanted to conserve ammunition or that he preferred marksmen, or just a logistical problem. Hitler had a similar belief. He wanted everyone, especially on the Eastern Front, to run around with a K98. In fact the STG44 (AK-47) was basically designed without him even knowing. Only until he was showed its effectiveness did he give the order to produce it in limited numbers. Rifles at Stalingrad, especially in the buildings were all but useless. You mite aswell run into a room with a cricket bat. But yeah, protecting a Fort or woteva it was, seems strange he wouldn't use Gatlings.
|
||
This user likes this post: |
10-01-2015, 10:14 AM | #37 | |||
Lyminge, Shepway, Kent
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Geelong - Go Cats
Posts: 3,197
|
Quote:
If the posts relate to failed military plans (i.e. the iniital expected result was not achieved), all well and good. If it becomes a discussion about ideology, that will close it.
__________________
Mel Brooks sums it up best; "Comedy is when you fall into an open sewer and die, tragedy is when I get a paper cut" Last edited by nuthin' fancy; 10-01-2015 at 04:07 PM. |
|||
This user likes this post: |
10-01-2015, 03:36 PM | #38 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,811
|
Quote:
Aside from the K98 Mauser, which was a fine rifle, the Germans had Schmeisser MP 40s but I am not sure how wide spread their use was... |
|||
This user likes this post: |
10-01-2015, 05:13 PM | #39 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,318
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...rms_of_Germany |
|||
This user likes this post: |
10-01-2015, 05:45 PM | #40 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,674
|
It wasn't weaponary that cost Germany the USSR, more so the logistical nightmare of supply in such a terrible winter.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
10-01-2015, 06:11 PM | #41 | ||
BF XR8 Ute
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Redlands
Posts: 4,441
|
2 x Atomic weapons on Japanese civilians.Yes It brought about an end to WW2,but at what cost to our planet and everyone's children's future??
__________________
Cheers Geoff _____________ HIS 2006 BF MKII XR8 Ute,Shockwave Blue. HERS New One Coming Past Rides:- XD Panel Van,XE Panel van,XF Wagon,ED Wagon,BA Fairmont,LX Focus Greetings Earthlings. |
||
10-01-2015, 06:19 PM | #42 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,674
|
It ended the war at a great cost...but imagine the human cost of an invasion of Japan and it's many well defended islands by people who would fight to the death to protect the emperor....the lesser of two evils.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
10-01-2015, 06:35 PM | #43 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,811
|
This is surely a monstrous military decision that I would not like to have on my conscience but the alternative was horrendous as well. Either way it was a lose, lose situation...
|
||
10-01-2015, 06:51 PM | #44 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,318
|
More people died from conventional bombings at Tokyo, Dresden and Cologne than both the A-bombs combined, that's just 3 major cities. Dozens were carpet bombed.
|
||
10-01-2015, 07:01 PM | #45 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,674
|
Most deaths in Dresden were from incendiary devices and many question why there was a need to bomb Dresden that late in the war.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
10-01-2015, 08:56 PM | #46 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,218
|
Barbarossa would have to be one of the worst given the impact on Europe for 50 years after it started.
There are numerous reasons why the Germans could never beat the Soviets, one was Hitler himself, a Corporal will never make a general and he fired the competent ones and appointed yes men in their place. The other factor was manpower, the Soviet army was replaced at least three times it's 1941 strength, the Germans could not win the war of attrition they found themselves caught up in. The Russians had better tanks (T-34 & KV series) that were able to cope with the harsh conditions and the their security services enabled them to keep far ahead of any German incursions behind the front lines. As an example read this brief summary of Operation Scherhorn/Operation Berezino, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Scherhorn. There were many significant studies performed by the Allies postwar on exactly why the Germans failed so there is plenty of excellent sourced material to peruse. Bill.
__________________
AUII XR6 VCT ute 20 years and still going strong! |
||
10-01-2015, 10:28 PM | #47 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,547
|
Don't know enough about Barbarossa to make an educated comment (though do know a couple of good bars in the Barossa), so will ignorantly ask what would have happened if Germany and Japan had managed to defeat the allies?
Would the fighting have stopped, or would Hitler's thoughts about supposed "lesser races" seen Germany then fight the Japs? Not sure of the accuracy of this, but I once read that WW1 was the last war in which military casualties outnumbered civilian casualties, and that in each subsequent war more civilians were killed than soldiers. Sad if that is true. Last edited by Iggle Piggle; 10-01-2015 at 10:34 PM. |
||
10-01-2015, 10:40 PM | #48 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,811
|
Not sure if Hitler was remotely interested in Japanese territory. He only sent forces to Greece and North Africa to fulfill the obligations of his alliance with Mussolini...
|
||
10-01-2015, 11:05 PM | #49 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Old Sydney Town
Posts: 440
|
|
||
10-01-2015, 11:36 PM | #50 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Old Sydney Town
Posts: 440
|
Adding to the thread, I believe the following were poor decisions,
WWI - Gallipoli campaign & The Battle of the Somme WWII - Bombing of Pearl Harbour 1588 - The Defeat of the Spanish Armada by the British |
||
10-01-2015, 11:57 PM | #51 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 397
|
What about Napoleon attacking Russia as well, have to be a one of the worst defeats ever. Hitler didn't look at history did he.
|
||
11-01-2015, 11:12 AM | #52 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuranda,Cairns
Posts: 388
|
Hitler should have allowed a full retreat from Stalingrad.Or Paulus should have just made a break for it.As for military blunders,the invasion of Vietnam would have to be up there.
__________________
Live and Let Live |
||
11-01-2015, 11:31 AM | #53 | ||
Donating Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,800
|
|
||
11-01-2015, 11:32 AM | #54 | |||
Pity the fool
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
|
Quote:
__________________
Fords I own or have owned: 1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin |
|||
This user likes this post: |
11-01-2015, 01:30 PM | #55 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,318
|
When the Germans first invaded the Soviet Union, for the most part they were considered liberators, especially from anyone that had witnessed half their family die on a collective farm in the Ukraine. But Hitler would have none of this, so by the end of the war he had militias and partisans with a million plus fighting strength trying to dismantle anything they could behind the lines. This drew huge amounts of resources from the front line (look up pripet marshes, that's were most of the resistance were based)
Barley any sealed roads and the entire railway system ran on a different gage. Getting spare parts and replacements (they had something like 8 different types of motorbikes or variant's) was a logistical nightmare. Only a few months into the campaign the German's captured about a million Russian soldiers, they didn't know what to do with them, they could barely feed themselves let alone all these extra mouths. Most died and some were transported to parts in Europe to work in factories if they were lucky. And if they spoke German they would sometimes receive ration-cards. In Stalingrad, as the grind came to an end and the German Armour went into hull-down positions over the winter, the crew would pack the inside of tanks with straw for warmth. This attracted rodents, and once they went to start their tanks, nothing happened, all the electrical wiring had been eaten,lol. And mechanics, especially for the Luftwaffe, couldn't service the engines properly because if they didn't wear gloves their skin would stick to any metal surface they touched. General Winter strikes again. |
||
11-01-2015, 01:41 PM | #56 | ||
Cynical Idealist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
|
Revenge for the bombing of Coventry. It was a long war and years of fighting desensitize anyone. If the Axis hadn't started the war in the first place, their member nations wouldn't have been bombed into submission.
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with! |
||
11-01-2015, 01:45 PM | #57 | |||
Cynical Idealist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
|
Quote:
And the Germans already knew from experience that fighting a war on two fronts was not sustainable.
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with! |
|||
11-01-2015, 02:35 PM | #58 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 132
|
The defence and fall of Malaya and Singapore goes down as some major stupidity on the part of the allies (British led) , the Japanese just outsmarted them at every move , even when the Japanese had stormed halfway down the Malay Peninsula the Brits were still expecting a seaborne attack against Singapore even though there were no Japanese fleet anywhere near the area and all there shore emplacements were pointing to seaward , the Japanese just marched across the Causeway and claimed Singapore , the Causeway was the lifeblood of Singapore and the Japanese controlled it so Singapore was theirs for the taking ,
The British had a scapegoat in Percival , and Percival was only following orders . Just another great British blunder as Singapore was their Jewel in the crown in South East Asia . |
||
11-01-2015, 03:15 PM | #59 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 446
|
Quote:
I was actually in Hiroshima last month and found the museum and peace park absolutely fascinating. There's no doubt that the two bombs were terrible, but IMO they were certainly a greater of two evils. If they weren't used, the Japanese wouldn't have surrendered thus resulting in the necessity of a ground invasion. This would have, in no doubt, resulted in far more deaths both on the side of the Allies (remember, we didn't start this war) and the Japanese. And because of the incredibly nationalistic tendency of the Japanese (soldiers and civilians), they wouldn't have surrendered so you'd have seen armed Japanese kids taking on American marines (and inevitably killed). Japanese women and children would be expected to fight for their emperor, or die. It's a very different worldview to us Europeans (US and AUS included). So in summary, there are two paths history would have taken: 1) Atomic bomb, Japanese civilian deaths, Japanese surrender. 2) No bomb, Allied invasion, Allied deaths, Japanese soldiers dead, Japanese civilians dead (probably more), then Japan would have surrendered. Nuclear weapons suck, but in this case, they were used properly and saved millions of lives. |
|||
11-01-2015, 03:19 PM | #60 | ||
Cynical Idealist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
|
And not a single nuclear weapon has been used in anger since 1945.
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with! |
||