|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-05-2011, 04:07 AM | #31 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
|
Quote:
|
|||
02-05-2011, 09:44 AM | #32 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,349
|
Quote:
The Cyclones seem to predate Ford's full commitment to FWD/AWD in cars and utilities, so maybe if they had their time over Ford would have chosen different displacements but never the less the 3.5 does a fine job muscling around the bigger Fords and we've yet to see the aftermarket tuners get to work exploring the limits of power and reliability. I keep imagining a "fully sick bro" 500 hp Ecoboost I-4 Falcon throwing down and scaring the ever livin' out of HSV's latest wow go faster V8 toy..... |
|||
02-05-2011, 10:13 AM | #33 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,312
|
Quote:
__________________
My ride: 2007 Falcon Ute BF XR8 Orange, MTO. |
|||
02-05-2011, 10:34 AM | #34 | |||
Straight Eight
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
|
Quote:
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon. |
|||
02-05-2011, 10:48 AM | #35 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
|
Quote:
NB The Ford 4.4L TDV8 outputs are 235kW/700Nm.
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s 226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013 14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013 Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell. Retrotech thread http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6 |
|||
02-05-2011, 10:53 AM | #36 | |||
Straight Eight
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
|
Quote:
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon. |
|||
04-05-2011, 07:11 PM | #37 | |||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
|
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/03/v...ales-in-april/
Quote:
__________________
Daniel |
|||
03-06-2011, 06:55 PM | #38 | |||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
|
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/02/f...ing-v8-models/
Quote:
__________________
Daniel |
|||
03-06-2011, 07:22 PM | #39 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Parkdale, Vic
Posts: 1,016
|
So let me get this straight - the dumbarse Yanks thing "going green" is buying a zillion tonne car with a slightly smaller engine to get a whopping 22MPG (WOW!) and that's great and that's going to same them fuel money & save the planet.
Ace. They sure are rocket scientists. That's why NASA is there I suppose.
__________________
"You can't fight stupid people - there's just too many of them" |
||
04-06-2011, 07:06 AM | #40 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 296
|
that percentage is staggering! american pickup truck drivers are stereotypical v8 lovers... and so many are buying the higher priced eco boost option! Ford Australia needs to get that motor over here as soon as possible. they should put the v6 in the falcon not the 4 cylinder.
|
||
04-06-2011, 07:12 AM | #41 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 296
|
Quote:
|
|||
04-06-2011, 07:26 AM | #42 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
|
Quote:
|
|||
04-06-2011, 09:05 AM | #43 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,349
|
Quote:
Got another one guys. Obviously you have no grasp of the concept of SARCASM..... Last edited by jpd80; 04-06-2011 at 09:23 AM. |
|||
04-06-2011, 09:16 AM | #44 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,349
|
May sales of F Truck (F150 + Super Duty) = 42,399
F150 is approx. 2/3s that figure and F150 sales breakdown is reported as: V6 = 14% Ecoboost = 41% V8 = 45% |
||
11-08-2011, 06:17 PM | #45 | |||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
|
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/08/10/f...by-v6-engines/
Quote:
__________________
Daniel |
|||
11-08-2011, 07:52 PM | #46 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
|
Ecoboost is racking up the sales! Let's hope it does the same for Falcon sales!
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s 226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013 14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013 Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell. Retrotech thread http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6 |
||
11-08-2011, 08:03 PM | #47 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
|
Quote:
Ecoboost F150 is more powerful and more torquey than the V8 so can Justify the $750 premium. Ecoboost Falcon will have less power and torque than the I6 and carry a $1500 (?) premium. Having said that I hope the Ecoboost Falcon sells up a storm, it sounds like a great engine. I think it would be good to have the Ecoboost as the standard engine and the I6 with more power and torque an optional extra. |
|||
11-08-2011, 08:39 PM | #48 | |||
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
Quote:
I'm amazed the V6 Ecoboost only does 1mpg less than the NA V6. Impressive. |
|||
11-08-2011, 09:29 PM | #49 | ||||
You dig, we stick!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett. |
||||
11-08-2011, 11:41 PM | #50 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
|
The ideas of converting the 4.0 I-6 to diesel and EcoBoost keep getting thrown around like it should be an easy add on, like adding extra cheese on a hamburger. Petrol engines that have been converted to diesel have not worked in the past. GM probably hopes nobody remembers the old 5.7L V8 diesel. The 6.2 and 6.5 were not much better either. Ford already makes fantastic diesels. The 3.2L I-5, 3.0L V6, 4.4L V8, and 6.7L V8. There is no reason to make a converted diesel out of the 4.0 I-6. The 3.5L V6 EcoBoost was designed and built for its application. Ford made the truck 3.5 using stronger components so that the engine would survive the abuse. Unless Ford redesigns the 4.0 from the ground up, it is not going to work as well.
|
||
13-08-2011, 02:13 PM | #51 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,289
|
The you tube link i saw about the this new EB F truck on this site months ago was VERY impressive.... Testing was arduos to say the least and they even did a world first 'live' strip down at some motorshow over there and all tolerences were well within spec... That was after log hauling in the woods and then desert racing in the umm , desert....
Just goes to show what some cam phasing and high boost can REALLY do..... The yanks have been burning way too much for way too long and need to opt for exactly this type of engine and tech ... just like us here with the EcoLPi ...We have the technology....Go Ford!!!! |
||
13-08-2011, 02:36 PM | #52 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
|
Quote:
|
|||
14-08-2011, 12:00 AM | #53 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,289
|
No way... The Baja desert test after like 100,000 'miles' did it for me....very impressive to say the least...
Last edited by GASWAGON; 14-08-2011 at 12:09 AM. |
||