Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14-04-2007, 11:58 PM   #31
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

If you want it as lumpy as possible your probably better off with getting the next cam up, which goes from 2700 rpm to 6800 rpm, that's what the guy from crow cams has told me, that one is way more aggressive. and with your engine,which i think you have 1.7 rockers already, i don't think you'd have to exchange them.
__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-04-2007, 12:14 AM   #32
philstoj
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
philstoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b2tf
excellent.mines tuned already and will be redone when the cam goes in, but i want it lumpy as possible!
Now relax Austin, no point going too big with all your standard gear on it, you know which one to get, it will work fine and have plenty of lumpiness and torque.
philstoj is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-04-2007, 02:42 PM   #33
b2tf
not here much anymore
 
b2tf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philstoj
Now relax Austin, no point going too big with all your standard gear on it, you know which one to get, it will work fine and have plenty of lumpiness and torque.
awww but phil (stamps feet) :

nah, i know which one to use.
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
b2tf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 03:11 PM   #34
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

Ok, a bit dissapointed. had the edit done today and came back with a reading of 167.6 RWKW. The tuner said that he was a bit dissapointed as well, he thought i'd be getting at least 180. he couldn't give it enough timing as he said and thought there was a restriction in the system somewhere. He reckons that I need to do my High Flow cats and give it a 3" cat back system. What sort of gains do you think I would get once i put High flow Cats in?
__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 03:40 PM   #35
StealthAu
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,981
Default

Depends, if yours is cactus alot, if not limited gains
StealthAu is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 03:51 PM   #36
b2tf
not here much anymore
 
b2tf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 302XLS
Ok, a bit dissapointed. had the edit done today and came back with a reading of 167.6 RWKW. The tuner said that he was a bit dissapointed as well, he thought i'd be getting at least 180. he couldn't give it enough timing as he said and thought there was a restriction in the system somewhere. He reckons that I need to do my High Flow cats and give it a 3" cat back system. What sort of gains do you think I would get once i put High flow Cats in?
dont get hung up about the number, when mine was done i was so ****ed off with the result (160rwkw) - I was thinking "wtf is wrong with my engine that is can only produce 160rwkw!!!!" - but the drivability and torque - farrrrrrrrrrrrrrr out you wouldnt know it was the same car. Ive been told by a number of people that the AU windsors can be a real bugger to get good numbers out of, but performance is easy.
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
b2tf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 04:02 PM   #37
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

Actually ... this is what i read recently.

HP wins dyno days ... torque wins races.

I like it. There are some low-power reading vehicles that are quite quick out there.
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 04:04 PM   #38
RG
Back to Le Frenchy
 
RG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Back home.....
Posts: 13,346
Default

Dyno numbers mean stuff all, 1/4 mile numbers are what matters. Seriously mine only puts out 204rwkw (before edit with unichip) and it pulls away from most things on the road (to the speed limit). While your kw number may be a tad low what is your torque like as that matters more.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew`SEVNT5
nah mate, aussie cars are the besterest and funnerest, nothing beats them, specially a poofy wrong wheel drive
07 Renault Sport Megane F1 Team R26 #1397
RG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 04:30 PM   #39
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

3900 N of torque if i read this thing correctly. Is that a lot or not much? how does that equate to ft/pd ?
__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 04:46 PM   #40
sprjenkins
Spr Jenkins
 
sprjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
Default

3900 nm of torque is almost 4 SL65 AMG's or almost 10 series 1 xr8's lol. I'm assuming a typo mate. Standard series 1 xr8's had 412nm's at 3500rpm
sprjenkins is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 04:47 PM   #41
sprjenkins
Spr Jenkins
 
sprjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
Default

However thats a flywheel figure, not sure how that equates to how much you put out at the rear wheels
sprjenkins is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 04:58 PM   #42
b2tf
not here much anymore
 
b2tf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sprjenkins
3900 nm of torque is almost 4 SL65 AMG's or almost 10 series 1 xr8's lol. I'm assuming a typo mate. Standard series 1 xr8's had 412nm's at 3500rpm
nup not a typo, some dyno graphs have a N reading instead of NM - mine does. What the difference is Im not exactly sure though lol.
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
b2tf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 05:06 PM   #43
sprjenkins
Spr Jenkins
 
sprjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
Default

hmm, very interesting, i'll try find the answer for you mate.
sprjenkins is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 05:25 PM   #44
Sledgehammer
Banned
 
Sledgehammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Qld Moderator
Posts: 3,731
Default

What heads are you running, youll find a large gain their as well.
Sledgehammer is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 05:31 PM   #45
sprjenkins
Spr Jenkins
 
sprjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
Default

A newton is the amount of force required to accelerate a body with a mass of one kilogram at a rate of one meter per second squared
NM is the amount of force applied over a distance arm of 1 metre.

So therefore it covers the ability of the engine to accelerate your car. A flat line on the graph will indicate constant acceleration, an upward sloping line will mean increasing acceleration and a downward sloping line will mean decreasing acceleration. That is you car is still accelerating but at a decresing rate. e.g. your accelerating at 2m/s now but in 1 seconds time you may be accelerating at 1.5m/s.

I'm pretty sure this is right. As to how much 3900 is, no idea. but the formula is

1N = 1*((kg*m)/s)

So all you need to know is the weight of your car and you can calculate how long it will take you to do the quarter approximatly. I think, maybe.
sprjenkins is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 06:56 PM   #46
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

ok, that makes a lot of sense......... : used:
__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 06:58 PM   #47
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

There was a good thread showing the exact formula.

Newtons measured is also affected by how the vehicle is strapped down on the dyno as well ... and a number of other factors too.

OK ... I was bored ... look here:
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...=Newton+Metres
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 07:12 PM   #48
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

hhhmmmmmmm used: used: used: used: used: used: used: used: ... lol
__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 07:14 PM   #49
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sledgehammer
What heads are you running, youll find a large gain their as well.

I'm running just the stock heads. that's on my wish list for future mods.
__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 07:35 PM   #50
philstoj
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
philstoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,256
Default

an you post up your dyno sheet please, give us a look at it.
philstoj is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 08:45 PM   #51
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

here you go



__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 09:11 PM   #52
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

so any opinions on the graph?
__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 09:20 PM   #53
sprjenkins
Spr Jenkins
 
sprjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
Default

So to me thats saying that the faster you go in kph the slower the rate of acceleration. Then you can see where you hit the limiter and acceleration stops. Maybe a good tuner could play around and figure out why you have that dip just after 120kph.

Torque drops away pretty quick after 140 kph though doesn't it. I suppose that would suit for the 1/4 mile though because your not going to be doing more than 87.5 mph for very long.

Thats just my opinion however and I don't claim to be an expert
__________________
-Before Chuck Norris visited them, they were called "The Virgin Islands" Now, they're just "The Islands"

-Mathematicians have found that due to the excessive amount of women Chuck Norris has slept with, it is guaranteed that he appears in your family tree a minimum of three times

-Chuck Norris doesn't sleep. He waits.

-Chuck Norris once worked as a weatherman for the San Diego evening news. Every night he would make the same forecast: Partly Cloudy with a 75% chance of Pain.
sprjenkins is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 09:26 PM   #54
philstoj
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
philstoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,256
Default

How does it feel after the edit?
philstoj is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 10:07 PM   #55
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

not too sure, i had the standard maf in before and changed it right before I had the edit done. I should have left in in and done a before and after. it does feel to have a steady take-off and acceleration, but don't think that the changing of the maf did anything. the intake grunt is awsome though. after the cam install i can't notice any difference in the custom tune to the generic though
__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-04-2007, 10:10 PM   #56
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sprjenkins
So to me thats saying that the faster you go in kph the slower the rate of acceleration. Then you can see where you hit the limiter and acceleration stops. Maybe a good tuner could play around and figure out why you have that dip just after 120kph.

Torque drops away pretty quick after 140 kph though doesn't it. I suppose that would suit for the 1/4 mile though because your not going to be doing more than 87.5 mph for very long.

Thats just my opinion however and I don't claim to be an expert
I see what you are saying, but remember that i am running with stock cats and the tuner said that he reckons that is limiting how much he can tune it, that it is causing a restriction, and once i change to high performance cats that he'd be able to adjust the tune to get more power out of it.
__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-04-2007, 02:35 PM   #57
sprjenkins
Spr Jenkins
 
sprjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
Default

Hmm very interesting stuff, can't wait to see how it goes for you. Are you coming to the drag nats, love to see what quarter time you get.
__________________
-Before Chuck Norris visited them, they were called "The Virgin Islands" Now, they're just "The Islands"

-Mathematicians have found that due to the excessive amount of women Chuck Norris has slept with, it is guaranteed that he appears in your family tree a minimum of three times

-Chuck Norris doesn't sleep. He waits.

-Chuck Norris once worked as a weatherman for the San Diego evening news. Every night he would make the same forecast: Partly Cloudy with a 75% chance of Pain.
sprjenkins is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-04-2007, 03:00 PM   #58
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sprjenkins
Hmm very interesting stuff, can't wait to see how it goes for you. Are you coming to the drag nats, love to see what quarter time you get.

When and where are they? I wouldn't mind coming, this would be a first for me (going to the Drag races). I'd like to get the cats done first, but am afraid might have to wait a while for more savings.
__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-04-2007, 08:18 PM   #59
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

Just bought a replacement MOMO leather steering wheel from ebay. $186.00 what a steel. As mine is worn out i have been waiting for a red one to come available and to get it at that price is awsome.
__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-04-2007, 08:38 PM   #60
302XLS
Regular Member
 
302XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 319
Default

here's a couple of pictures of it, but mine won't have the triptronic buttons on the wheel







__________________
SEE MY CAR HERE
AND MAKE SURE TO VOTE!!!




302XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL