|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
31-05-2012, 03:37 PM | #61 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 120
|
well, don't think of it as a mundane taxi, but for arguments sake, think of it as Australias answer to Germanys BMW, (yes I know the quality is different, but look at it from a niche market point of view) An equivalent size bimmer would probably be the 5 series. You can get all different size motors options, etc. Now think Australia, traditionally Australia only gets a choice of 2 motors, now ECOBOOST, ECOLPi, 6s, 8s, turbo (and talks of a diesel) are available for consumers. Wouldn't you think thats a step in the right direction? ECOBOOST, still rear wheel drive, seats 5 real adults and the FACT that its made in Australia should be points to consider. And don't forget about spare parts which are readily available and relatively cheap too. Kia Optimas are nice but cmon, G6 TURBO 4 banger with a bit of fruit for $36-$37k......thats good value in my books!!
|
||
31-05-2012, 06:20 PM | #62 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 740
|
I wouldn't mention the Falcon and 5 Series in the same sentence. Very, very different cars.
|
||
31-05-2012, 06:39 PM | #63 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 120
|
i never said they were they same, Im saying Fords adopting overseas ways of trying to capture audience from a broader spectrum and not limiting themselves to just 6s and 8s.......and in saying that Id still pick an $85k FPV over a $85k BMW anyway...
|
||
31-05-2012, 08:40 PM | #64 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,653
|
Quote:
Funny enough I actully cross shopped an XR6T & 5 series, but ended up with XR6T becuase I thought it was better bang for the buck!! |
|||
31-05-2012, 08:46 PM | #65 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
|
Quote:
Note the XT has an official 8.1L/100km figure, then G6/G6E have 8.5L/100km as they miss out on the low rolling resistance tyres and some other low aero underbody work apparently. Wheels massively rate the Ecoboost Falcon and wish it was here from the beginning of FG. They also bag the Commodores 'already torque deficient V6 and reduced capacity' at trying to be eco efficient but not. The turbo 4 pot Falcon surfing on a wave of low rev torque. The Commodore needs to harshly kick down to be still be slower. The EcoBoost Falcon is a winner in their eyes, they wish Falcon sold more. I hope so too.
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s 226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013 14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013 Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell. Retrotech thread http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6 |
|||
01-06-2012, 08:33 AM | #66 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 677
|
Quote:
|
|||
01-06-2012, 10:33 AM | #67 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 740
|
Quote:
Seriously, next you'll say you shopped the XR6T against a 911 and 458.. |
|||
01-06-2012, 11:59 AM | #68 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,653
|
Quote:
|
|||
01-06-2012, 12:23 PM | #69 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,309
|
If I had the $$$, it would be the 5 series..game over...
__________________
CSGhia |
||
01-06-2012, 12:26 PM | #70 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 677
|
Quote:
|
|||
01-06-2012, 01:51 PM | #71 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
|
Quote:
I knew someone many years ago who crossed-shopped a Mitsubishi Verada XI with a 5 series. He ended up with the Verada as he couldnt see the value of spending 60% more on a car he thought was only 10% better. Nevermind he could probably afford a dozen BMWs. |
|||
01-06-2012, 02:02 PM | #72 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,653
|
Quote:
|
|||
01-06-2012, 02:28 PM | #73 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 40
|
Wife's old X5 .... $15k in service costs over 4 years ....
|
||
01-06-2012, 03:23 PM | #74 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 120
|
Dollar for dollar ford still wins hands down!!! Take a brand new fpv gt-p around $80k brand new vs a brand new $80k bmw 520i.......im not talking about engine capacity or anything purely dollar value bang for buck but still within same auto class...who in there right mind would buy the bimmer??? Now if u compare a gtp equivalent which would be the m5, of course its a better car but is it going to be 90-100k better??? The argument here is finding the best value car for the money you can afford. With the way the economy is budget concious consumers cant afford to run a 6, do they look for an alternative ie optima/i45/camry/etc. how many times have you heard people say "but its a front wheel drive" now the alternative available is a falcon turbo 4, rear wheel drive, seats 5 adults.....so before people start bagging a 4cycl falcon, look around and see whats available and u will soon realise its a smart move.
|
||
01-06-2012, 10:26 PM | #75 | ||||
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
Quote:
Quote:
And I was referring to the Ecoboost as struggling. |
||||
01-06-2012, 10:26 PM | #76 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,573
|
Quote:
|
|||
01-06-2012, 10:32 PM | #77 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,573
|
Quote:
|
|||