Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29-07-2010, 06:10 PM   #61
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,410
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrisVegas
The 2.7 diesel going into the Territory should create some interest for a few more years, but it's seems pretty inevitable to me that Oz will get the Explorer in the next model cycle of the Falcon/Territory.

FWIW, I can also see the mainstream Falcon being replaced by the Taurus given the one platform stratgey. I think there will remain a place for performance RWD Falcon as it merges with Mustang next time around.
IF that were to happen, then I could see Ford Aust. picking up the contract for
all LHD Explorer and Taurus in the Ford Asia pacific and South Africa region.

My bet is still on another RWD Falcon post 2015/6...
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-07-2010, 07:09 PM   #62
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default

What do the nay-sayers say now?

I recall many saying that a 4 cyl falcon will be a gutless wonder.
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-07-2010, 07:41 PM   #63
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
What do the nay-sayers say now?

I recall many saying that a 4 cyl falcon will be a gutless wonder.
just remember that you are on a ford forum full of ford and car enthusiasts.

believe me, there are people out there who hear '4cyl falcon' and turn up their nose.

its a bit like lpg. the new technology in that industry is amazing and yet there are a vast majority of people who hear lpg and think slow taxi fuel.
prydey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-07-2010, 07:46 PM   #64
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

It will not be marketed as a 4cyl (in the Falcon) but as Ecoboost.
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-07-2010, 08:09 PM   #65
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,777
Default

its all about public perception. the same public that think the holden commodore is 100% australian, and line up in droves to get a piece of it.
prydey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2010, 05:26 PM   #66
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Ford premium price for EcoBoost

http://www.goauto.com.au/mellor/mell...2577700007C10D

Quote:
New four-cylinder Explorer hints at price premium for fuel-saving Falcon

30 July 2010

By MATHIEU RAUDONIKIS

FORD reportedly will charge a premium for the fuel-saving EcoBoost four-cylinder version of its new-generation American Explorer SUV over the more powerful but thirstier V6 standard model.

The pricing policy for the EcoBoost Explorer in the US raises questions over the price plans for Ford Australia’s EcoBoost Falcon which is set to arrive on the Australian market in 2011 with the identical 176kW 2.0-litre turbocharged petrol engine that will also appear in the European Mondeo from August.

While Ford has not yet announced the price of the EcoBoost variant of the Explorer, which was launched across the US this week, Bloomberg quotes Explorer's chief engineer Jim Holland as saying: “We really want to make a statement that the old baggage on fuel economy with the Explorer is gone.

“To get great fuel economy it takes technology, and it's our view that people will pay for that.”

Bloomberg has interpreted that to mean that to mean that Ford is planning to charge extra for the EcoBoost technology, as it does already in its Ford Flex EcoBoost V6 range.

In Australia, the EcoBoost engine will slot into the Falcon sedan range alongside the 4.0-litre in-line six-cylinder variants, which currently start at $36,950 for the XR50 50th anniversary model.

Holden’s most fuel-efficient Commodore, the 3.0-litre SIDI V6, lines up at $39,990 – the likely target price for the EcoBoost version that, like the 3.0-litre Commodore, will be aimed at fleets looking to cut fuel costs.

Ford2011 Explorer center imageThe EcoBoost Falcon, however, will have a significant fuel advantage, returning a combined consumption figures of about 8.5 litres per 100km compared with 3.0-litre Commodore’s 9.3L/100km and 3.5-litre Toyota Aurion’s 9.9L/100km.

With Ford’s Australia’s Territory SUV about to be updated in 2011 with a new 2.7-litre TDV6 diesel engine, the American Explorer is unlikely to return to local showrooms anytime soon.

Ford took the wraps off its all-new Explorer via social networking website Facebook before a multi-city launch roll-out across the US.

The 2011 Explorer dispenses with the truck-like frame chassis of previous models, instead being built on the lighter, monocoque platform of the front-drive Ford Taurus – the car that is expected to provide the base of the next-generation Ford Falcon in Australia.

Also gone is the traditional V8, as Ford addresses the fuel-sucking reputation that it says put many buyers off the big four-wheel drive in the past.

Ford is yet to release fuel consumption figures for the new Explorer except to say the new V6 will deliver 20 per cent better economy than the current model V6 and the EcoBoost four will be a further 10 per cent better again.

Ford claims the EcoBoost’s fuel consumption akin to a US-spec Camry V6, making the Explorer more economical than key US competitors such as the Honda Pilot and Toyota Highlander (Kluger) V6.

As well as the benefits of the EcoBoost and updated V6 engines, the 2011 Explorer reduces fuel consumption with low-rolling resistance tyres, a more aerodynamic shape, weight reduction and electrically assisted power steering.

Explorer 3.5-litre V6 prices start at $US28,995 ($A30,007) for the two-wheel-drive (front-wheel-drive) model producing 216kW and 345Nm. All-wheel-drive is optional on base model and standard on XLT and Limited Explorers.

The turbocharged direct-injection EcoBoost engine produces 176kW at 5500rpm and 337Nm between 1750 and 4000rpm and will be an option on all three grades but only as a front-wheel-drive. A six-speed automatic transmission is standard on both engines.

The radical styling of the 2011 Explorer shares a lot with current Range Rover design.

The floating roof effect is created by blacked out pillars, just as it is on Range Rover, with the scalloped door panels and shape of the front guards being reminiscent of the Range Rover Sport.

The Explorer retains the forward-sloping C-pillar of previous models, whilst the three-bar grille clearly marks it as a modern Ford.

The console in the new Explorer features a ‘Terrain Management System’, much like Land Rover’s acclaimed Terrain Response dial that adapts the vehicle’s electronically-controlled chassis and drivetrain control systems to different road conditions such as sand, snow and mud. The TMS dial in Explorer also features a hill-descent function.

The similarities to Land Rover come as no surprise as Mr Holland served as chief engineer at Land Rover for three programs while the British marque was under Ford ownership.

“The new Explorer represents the democratisation of luxury SUV levels of style, craftsmanship, technology and capability,” said Mr Holland.

“Explorer’s terrain management system is a great example of high-end SUV technology – and the customer empowerment this technology enables – becoming much more broadly accessible.”

Along with its heavy-duty chassis, the Explorer has lost its low-range gearing for serious off-road use.

Ford’s vehicle engineering manager Todd Hoevener said the new model would still deliver the go-anywhere experience American SUV buyers expected.

“Our new Explorer is going to change consumer perceptions of what an SUV can be,” he said.

“The user-friendly and accessible capabilities of the intelligent 4WD terrain management system combined with significantly improved performance, handling and fuel economy will help our customers to more efficiently and confidently use their Explorers just as they have before.”

The Explorer was the subject of a major investigation in the US in the 1990s following a series of vehicle rollovers resulting in deaths and injuries.

On its Taurus based monocoque chassis, the 2011 Explorer should offer much improved handing and dynamics and will feature electronic traction and stability control, plus curve control – a new feature that automatically applies the brakes if it senses that the vehicle has enter a corner to quickly.

Front and side airbags are supplemented by industry-first inflating seatbelt bags in the second row seats. These are designed to spread the force of an accident and reduce chest head and neck injuries for passengers.

The Explorer can also be optioned with BLIS® (Blind Spot Information System) taken from another former Ford brand, Volvo.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2010, 10:00 PM   #67
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
You see... if Goauto read AFF instead of Bloomberg they would have released this article two-three days ago.
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2010, 10:11 PM   #68
spvd02
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 290
Default 3.0l Sidi

What's my bet that, when released, Holden will still brag about their 3.0L being "more powerful than Ford's ECOboost, yet more fuel efficient than a Toyota Aurion"? - or something with that kind of spin. Wouldn't surprise me; it's as believable as Holden thinking they make the best cars on the road (nice one).
spvd02 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2010, 10:43 PM   #69
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,410
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Holden can brag all they like so long as it's in past tense...
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2010, 11:53 PM   #70
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

2011 Ford Explorer Vehicle Tour

First Look: 2011 Ford Explorer - Exterior

First Look: 2011 Ford Explorer - Interior
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-07-2010, 06:44 AM   #71
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,410
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Would love to see Ecoboost 2.0 I-4 with two extra cylinders,
that would give a 3.0 I-6 with 264 Kw and 505 nm.


It is very possible to have your cake and eat it too......
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-07-2010, 12:01 PM   #72
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
Would love to see Ecoboost 2.0 I-4 with two extra cylinders,
that would give a 3.0 I-6 with 264 Kw and 505 nm.


It is very possible to have your cake and eat it too......
What about a 4.0L I6 EcoBoost

Then again it would probably be that much of a grunt monster it would rip itself out of the car.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-07-2010, 12:50 PM   #73
phillyc
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phillyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always factual and beneficial. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior
What about a 4.0L I6 EcoBoost

Then again it would probably be that much of a grunt monster it would rip itself out of the car.
It's called the F6!
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s
226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013
14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013

Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell.

Retrotech thread
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6
phillyc is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-07-2010, 02:16 PM   #74
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phillyc
It's called the F6!
If it ran on regular unleaded, featured direct injection, and used the same amount of fuel as a regular N/A 4.0 I-6 DI engine, and had around 350kw/620Nm from 1700-5000 rpm with zero lag, it could be called EcoBoost.
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-07-2010, 02:31 PM   #75
rex351
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Port Lincoln SA
Posts: 240
Default

Or EvilBoost!
rex351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-07-2010, 07:34 PM   #76
Dr Smith
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melb.
Posts: 4,483
Default

Thanks for those links. Have to say the new Explorer, if loaded up with all the fruit makes my G6ET look a little povo pack in comparison. It's range of features is very impressive.
Dr Smith is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-07-2010, 07:51 PM   #77
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

You're welcome Doc. It's only a matter of time now before we get the same level of equipment - courtesy of "One Ford".



Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior
What about a 4.0L I6 EcoBoost

Then again it would probably be that much of a grunt monster it would rip itself out of the car.
The Taurus' platform was nowhere near strong enough to handle the 3.5 Ecoboost - it, too, was getting ripped (blown FG had similar problems) - and required beefing up, thus the 1900+kg. The result, though, is a very solid vehicle.
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-07-2010, 10:26 PM   #78
Wretched
Render unto Caesar
 
Wretched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ::1
Posts: 4,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falc'man
You're welcome Doc. It's only a matter of time now before we get the same level of equipment - courtesy of "One Ford".
This is exactly what Ford OZ needs to be able to leverage off their international counterparts to really offer a decent level of equipment for their range topping Falcon, G6E(T). One Ford will hopefully bring some technology to the local Ford range that will set them apart, to justify the extra $$.
__________________
"Aliens might be surprised to learn that in a cosmos with limitless starlight, humans kill for energy sources buried in sand." - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Wretched is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL