|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
28-03-2011, 07:07 PM | #61 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
|
Quote:
You still have the reciprocating mass of all eight cylinders and friction of a much heavier driveline hindering the benefit of deactivating 4 cylinders. I believe Motor did a test with the Boss 290 xr8 and the SS 260 AFM and the XR8 achieved .2 of a litre better economy. |
|||
28-03-2011, 07:10 PM | #62 | |||
Straight Eight
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
|
Quote:
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon. |
|||
28-03-2011, 07:25 PM | #63 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
|
Quote:
Ford would get the same result. At cruise you are using almost no fuel anyway so the added complexity of deactivating cylinders is pointless. A 4 cylinder has 4 cylinder fuel economy because it has a much lighter driveline, is usually in a much lighter car, and has less reciprocating mass. Put a little 4 cylinder in a heavy car and you get V8 like fuel consumption i.e. the Holden (Daewoo) Cruze. |
|||
28-03-2011, 07:40 PM | #64 | |||
Straight Eight
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
|
Quote:
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon. |
|||
28-03-2011, 08:15 PM | #65 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
|
Quote:
Ecoboost is Turbocharged. That changes the torque delivery to allow better acceleration with less fuel use. If you notice all the other engines that have been referred to are N/A. Ecoboost is nothing like deactivating 4 cylinders on a 5.4 or 6.0 litre V8. |
|||
28-03-2011, 10:19 PM | #66 | |||
Straight Eight
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
|
Quote:
Surely AFM saves some fuel for people with V8's in these conditions?
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon. |
|||
29-03-2011, 04:42 PM | #67 | |||
Now Fordless
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fremantle, WA
Posts: 3,611
|
Quote:
Ecoboost would use a smallish turbo so boost would come on quite early. Would have plenty of pull around town. Would be similar to a turbo diesel. |
|||
29-03-2011, 04:46 PM | #68 | |||
Straight Eight
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
|
Quote:
But around town... AFM could save a few litres.
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon. |
|||
29-03-2011, 06:05 PM | #69 | |||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
|
Quote:
__________________
Daniel |
|||
29-03-2011, 06:09 PM | #70 | |||
Straight Eight
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
|
Quote:
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon. |
|||
29-03-2011, 10:38 PM | #71 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
|
Quote:
|
|||
30-03-2011, 01:06 PM | #72 | |||
Starter Motor
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
Remember they are also getting heavier! Its power to weight that people forget. |
|||