|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-06-2007, 01:52 PM | #91 | |||
Starter Motor
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 28
|
Good on him for contesting the charge and to highlight a road rule that needed clarification.
It would have cost a lot more then the $180 fine to take it to the Supreme Court. http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems...6/s1943653.htm Quote:
|
|||
07-06-2007, 02:33 AM | #92 | |||
To punish and enslave
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Victoria
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Using a hand-held mobile phone whilst driving is an offence. |
|||
07-06-2007, 03:15 AM | #93 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,409
|
Quote:
These items distract your attention in the same as you mind would wander while speaking on a phone, I often will look at the flowers the flower seller has on the side of the road, look at furniture out the front of secondhand shops, or as stated petrol signs amongst many of the hundreds of daily distractions as i drive by, we all do. And if deemed a distraction could a business be prosected then by having thier wavy sale banners out in the wind and you claiming the accident was caused by a distraction ? one that was put in place by the store owner. Sounds all funny and yea right as if thats going to happen , what a stupid idea, ? no more stupid than the rules they are trying to push on us now. |
|||
07-06-2007, 08:32 AM | #94 | ||
The one and only
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Carrum Downs, Victoria
Posts: 9,053
|
I agree with it 100%
act is people can not talk on the phone and drive safely.
__________________
1992 DC LTDHO 360rwkw built by me Tuned by CVE Performance Going of the rails on a crazy train Other cars include Dynamic ED Sprint, Dynamic DL LTD, Sparkling Burgundy DL LTD, Yellow, Red & Blue XB sedan & Black XB Coupe
|
||
07-06-2007, 12:21 PM | #95 | ||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,699
|
the decision by the judge has since prompted a rule change and it is now legal to use a hands free device, which is what this thread was about.
was all over the radio monday or tuesday here in s.a. all the do gooders can climb back in their boxes now and find something else to whinge about. |
||