Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2014, 11:21 PM   #91
AC
Saving for a Jet Car
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: richmond.nsw.au
Posts: 3,745
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Damo View Post
I'm getting 5.5L/100km driving around my Diesel Focus on all highway, goes up to 6L/100km if I boot it everywhere.
I was referring to unleaded, diesels do, do well, one of my work mates raves about his i30 diesel, says he's disappointed when he gets less than 1200kms a tank. Although he does highway travel to work from the central coast to Sydney each day, probably sitting in 6th gear most the way.
__________________
RIDES
2011 SZ Territory Titanium TDCi - Smoke
2001 Mitsubishi "BONSAI" GSR Mirage - see thread
AC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-02-2014, 01:46 PM   #92
superfly
Go the Hogster!
 
superfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,518
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I recently did a trip up the coast and I saw 7.8L on the dash and a theorectical DTE of 720ks. I was very happy with that mileage

Around town I get 10.5 - 11.5L.
__________________
Nitro XR50 - the last brand new one in OZ
first registered Oct 2011.
superfly is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-02-2014, 03:07 PM   #93
smoo
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
smoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,446
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Best I've achieved, all open road

FG XR6, 7.2l/100km
BA Fairmont Ghia 4.0, 7.5
AU Futura, 7.6
BA Fairlane 5.4, 9.0

And I was most impressed with a rental 6.0 Caprice I had, 8.2l/100km over 700km 99k average speed. Keep your cramped **** boxes, the price to pay to drive something that can cover big distances effortlessly isn't much more.
smoo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-02-2014, 03:10 PM   #94
jpblue1000
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpblue1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,252
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Jesus, low figures
My old EB Tow wagon averaged 19.7 over the 6 years I owned it. had it at ford and others trying to work out its high consumption, nothing wrong!. Now the AU Tow ute is slightly better averaging 14.6 in the 14 months Ive had it though has recorded mid 9s on trips while empty 13's towing the race car.
I have feet of lead obviously.
Econo box will run sub 7's all day everyday 4 up but wont tow hmmm.

JP
jpblue1000 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-02-2014, 03:14 PM   #95
whitesoarer
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ACT
Posts: 208
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I drove from Canberra to Campbelltown in my G8, and averaged 8.6l/100. Not bad for a barge!
whitesoarer is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-02-2014, 03:58 PM   #96
red_hotxr6
Banned
 
red_hotxr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brisbane
Posts: 2,039
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpblue1000 View Post
Jesus, low figures
My old EB Tow wagon averaged 19.7 over the 6 years I owned it. had it at ford and others trying to work out its high consumption, nothing wrong!. Now the AU Tow ute is slightly better averaging 14.6 in the 14 months Ive had it though has recorded mid 9s on trips while empty 13's towing the race car.
I have feet of lead obviously.
Econo box will run sub 7's all day everyday 4 up but wont tow hmmm.

JP
Did you or have you changed your O2 sensor, i couldnt get my el ghia down past 15l per 100klms, changed that and highway runs are now 9.5lper 100.
red_hotxr6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-02-2014, 04:05 PM   #97
jpblue1000
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpblue1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,252
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by red_hotxr6 View Post
Did you or have you changed your O2 sensor, i couldnt get my el ghia down past 15l per 100klms, changed that and highway runs are now 9.5lper 100.
I didnt on the EB, no one diagnosed it as a problem, and it was tested!
The AU is about to get a new motor so new 02 might be worth a go, but it could be because its only got 4 working cylinder and 2 half working ones.
Not a major issue as the towing is the cheap part of the weekend and the additional cost pales into insignificance...

Cheers for the thought

JP
jpblue1000 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-02-2014, 04:31 PM   #98
ELLIOT
Regular Member
 
ELLIOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 47
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I no it's not the same trip but I did Coffs Harbour to Brisbane in my 2009 G6E turbo with average fuel Econ of 7.4L/100
Also done it in my 2007 VE SSV and it's average was 8.5L/100
ELLIOT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-02-2014, 04:44 PM   #99
El Venom
normality is boring
Donating Member1
 
El Venom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Up in the hills on the QLD/NSW boarder
Posts: 1,803
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I am getting 10-11/100km in my el 5L wagon combined driving (city and hwy) Now if I actually drove it gently and it had a better tune, I have no doubt that it would be more economical but even as it is I am still rather happy with it, especially when I find a hybrid owner driving under the speed limit.
__________________

Factory v8 with turbonetics 67mm turbo, haltech ecu, aeromotive and raceworks fuel system, cobra intake and a few custom bits thrown in
El Venom is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-02-2014, 05:11 PM   #100
chopstar87
The Original ChopstaR
 
chopstar87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 277
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

My 300c (v6 petrol) is brilliant on the highway.... i can get over 800kms a tank, averaging 8-9L per 100kms. Thats sitting at 105km/h with the adoptive cruise control on. At 105km/h, the 300c sits about 1300rpm (8th gear)

Around town, totally different story... lol! A 1950kg car without passagers in stop start traffic will see about 13L per 100km/h.

Still better then my BA XR6 4spd which saw 15L per 100kms combined. But ba falcons were known to eat fuel. But i am sure the fg would be quiet good with the 6spd zf.
__________________
Car History:

May 2006 – October 2006: 2002 Proton Persona
October 2006 – July 2013: 2004 BA Ford Falcon XR6 (Blueprint – 4 speed Auto – Premium Audio - No Tracton Control )
July 2013 - ???: 2013 Chrysler 300c Luxury (Bright white – Panoramic Sunroof – 19 speaker 900 watt Harmon/Kardon stereo)
November 2013 - ???: 2013 Ford Focus Sport (the missus's car, white, manual)
chopstar87 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-02-2014, 05:28 PM   #101
tranquilized
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,112
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I don't have any exact figures, but I was massively impressed with the economy I got from an FG series 1 XR6 with just over 100,000km on the clock that I hired in January this year in New Zealand.

The first part of the road trip I went right around the East Cape with just my girlfriend in the car, so unsurprisingly given all the bends, economy wasn't so great on that stage...

But then I drove from Wellington to Mt Maunganui which was around 550km, with 4 people plus luggage, several foot to the floor overtakes but otherwise relatively sedate driving. At the end of the trip the DTE was showing 250km+ which gave a theoretical range of 800km! Absolutely insane economy for a big six I reckon.
tranquilized is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2014, 12:22 PM   #102
Gadgetman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 691
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJM83 View Post
On recent trips i struggled to get my tuned Focus below 9 so thats pretty good going.
I was averaging 8.9 l/100km in my last focus st. Now I have travelled 1650km so far in a mk2 GT auto. 22.6 l/100km. But my last long distance drive was Melbourne to goulburn in an FG G6E. 7.4 L/100km. The stock six is a ripper.
Gadgetman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2014, 12:36 PM   #103
Syndrome
DJT 45 and 47 POTUS
 
Syndrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 7,373
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

My 2009 FG XR6 is averaging 11.5l/100km over the last four years of mostly city driving. I am very happy with this figure.
__________________
Falcon: 1960 - 2016

My cars

Current ride
2016 FG X XR6 - 6 speed manual

Previous rides
2009 FG XR6 - 6 speed auto
2006 BF MkII XT ESP - 6 speed auto
2003 BA XT V8 - 5 speed manual
1999 AU Forte - 5 speed manual
1997 EL Fairmont - 4 speed auto
1990 EAII Fairmont Ghia - 4 speed auto
Syndrome is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL