|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
22-05-2012, 08:25 AM | #121 | ||
Donating Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,142
|
I like to have a car that appeals to me in every facet.
|
||
22-05-2012, 08:57 AM | #122 | |||
Broken
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
|
Quote:
A car that’s equipped with the engine capable of spitting out 600rwhp can be driven every single day, rain hail or shine. Just because it can produce the power, and the torque associated with that power, doesn’t mean it can't be a perfectly capable, perfectly competent street car. With the popularity of blowers and turbos, 600rwhp is nothing to get overly excited about now-a-days, it’s been done many times over in the street car application. I do agree that many people have no real appreciation of how hard a 400+ rear wheel kw car can go, not that many have been in one driven at maximum attack, yet alone driven one at maximum attack. I would go as far as to say, there is less people capable of driving the 600hp car at maximum attack than those that are not. However, from my own experience, bigger output and commuting transport is not mutually exclusive! That’s not to say I endorse P plate restricted drivers all being supplied 600hp motorcars! Get the package right, adopt the right attitude, drive with a modicum of restraint, it is perfectly viable. Cost is not a consideration in the point I am trying to make. 30000km of daily driven and track utilised driving with my own package sends (to me at least!) a pretty clear message. Good power can be applied in a street car and remain practicle in the daily driven application. tex
__________________
The Scud GT 11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft. |
|||
22-05-2012, 09:31 AM | #123 | ||
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 370
|
Simple...Clean...Unexpectedly Powerful. Will garner equal respect everytime.
Of Course depends on your definition of "Bling" |
||
22-05-2012, 09:41 AM | #124 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 710
|
If by bling you mean charcoal tint, tastefull set of wheels (not chrome 22" dolce rubbish) and lowered slightly, well maintained paint and perhaps mild skirting job (eg DRJ320 kit on a BA) then I'd take that coupled with my stock XR6T.
OR spend same amount of $$$ (Say $2500)? on tune/valvesprings/intake/exhaust - i'd go the bling.
__________________
BA XR6 Turbo, Narooma Blue - Heinrich Tune, 19" BBS LM Replicas, 20% Tint Distant Past: '96 EFII Fairmont Ghia - Tickford Motor, Saloon car cam, 5sp, AU XR8 Snorkel, Extractors, 2.5" exhaust, Tickford Kit, Pedders suspension. Distant Past: '95 EF Fairmont - Cardinal Red, Auto, 17's King Lows, 115rwkw |
||
22-05-2012, 09:14 PM | #125 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,922
|
Quote:
Having bling is like walking a chiwawa round the block with a big bow around it, people look and smirk. Bling is to look good for others, horsepower is for personal enjoyment. |
|||
28-05-2012, 05:35 AM | #126 | ||
Brad
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,827
|
Last sentence is open for discussion.
|
||