Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

View Poll Results: Best bang for your bucks small car under 25 grand poll
Ford : Fiesta 21 9.33%
Ford : Focus 55 24.44%
Holden: Astra 10 4.44%
Holden: Viva 0 0%
Honda: Civic 5 2.22%
Honda: Jazz 0 0%
Hyundai: Accent 3 1.33%
Hyundai: Elantra 3 1.33%
Hyundai: Getz 4 1.78%
Kia: Cerrato 2 0.89%
Mazda: 2 1 0.44%
Mazda: 3 46 20.44%
Mitsubitchi: Colt 2 0.89%
Mitsubitshi: Lancer 10 4.44%
Nissan: Pulsar 0 0%
Nissan: Tida 0 0%
Peugeot:XR 5dr 1.4 0 0%
Peugeot: XR 3dr 1.4 0 0%
Peugeot: XT 5dr 1.6 1 0.44%
Peugeot: C 5dr 1.6 0 0%
Suberu: Impreza 15 6.67%
Suzuki: Swift 11 4.89%
Toyota: Corolla 7 3.11%
Toyota: Yaris 3 1.33%
Volkswagen: Polo 1.9 TDI 23 10.22%
Volkswagen: Polo 1.6 3 1.33%
Voters: 225. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-10-2006, 02:05 PM   #151
mowog
Discovery 4
 
mowog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photn
yet you still insist that small cars are shopping trolley's??

what makes them a shopping trolley?
I Just finished a road trip with 2 of my cars.

The Territory and 1 of the Barina SRi's... We were always stopping to put fuel in the Barina because of the 45l tank (same as the Fiesta). The Barina did the trip ok but it is realy just a city car when you compare it to likes of a good large sedan. They just dont suit traveling vast distances like we have in Oz.

I wouldnt take my Corolla on a long trip because its just to noisy and firm in the suspension. But I have no problem taking it to the shops or an interesting day drive on some good driving roads.

I have the income where I can afford a diiferent cars for different needs. If you can only afford to finance 1 car and its you whole world then I see why your defensive about it being called a shopping car. But I can tell you I would take the Territory over a small car any day on long trip. But when it comes to shopping then its one of the other toys.
__________________
###
Blue Ranger Wildtrak V6 on the way. Factory Canopy & 140l ARB fuel tank.
Discovery 4 3.0 TDV6 SE. Long range aux tank, Kaymar Rear Bar, 18" Off Road rims.
Lotus Trooper.
Mini Inspired by Goodwood.
mowog is offline  
Old 16-10-2006, 03:33 PM   #152
Boss 290
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 447
Default

who cares how many cars you have.....the thing about the focus and the fiesta is that they can be taken on long trips because they feel smooth and are comfortable with 4 people....i think your a little peevd that the barina was forgoten in this poll....any car can be called a name its how you veiw it....people say the gt is a family car....yes it can cary a family comfortable but does it make it a family car? no i call it a 4 door performance car....you can say the fiesta is a shopping car but others may say it is a teenager car with great economy...not to mention great handling and looks....i think mowog you should leave the insults out of this....not everyone car afford the cars you have but then again you cant afford a ford gt so i guess you wouldnt like your cars being called budget cars by those rich people, would you?
Boss 290 is offline  
Old 16-10-2006, 05:12 PM   #153
mowog
Discovery 4
 
mowog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss 290
who cares how many cars you have.....the thing about the focus and the fiesta is that they can be taken on long trips because they feel smooth and are comfortable with 4 people....i think your a little peevd that the barina was forgoten in this poll....any car can be called a name its how you veiw it....people say the gt is a family car....yes it can cary a family comfortable but does it make it a family car? no i call it a 4 door performance car....you can say the fiesta is a shopping car but others may say it is a teenager car with great economy...not to mention great handling and looks....i think mowog you should leave the insults out of this....not everyone car afford the cars you have but then again you cant afford a ford gt so i guess you wouldnt like your cars being called budget cars by those rich people, would you?
I am not peeved about anything I am just trying to show that there is a Ford Bias in this poll. Go do the same poll on a Toyota or Holden site and see what happens.

I only used the Barina as an example. What I can or cant afford well that you dont know but I do. Would I buy a GT nope nice car but not what I want.

I didnt say you couldnt take a shopping car for an extended road trip I said I would prefer my Territory for that. After 1600klm in one day I think I know which car I would rather be in.
__________________
###
Blue Ranger Wildtrak V6 on the way. Factory Canopy & 140l ARB fuel tank.
Discovery 4 3.0 TDV6 SE. Long range aux tank, Kaymar Rear Bar, 18" Off Road rims.
Lotus Trooper.
Mini Inspired by Goodwood.
mowog is offline  
Old 16-10-2006, 06:05 PM   #154
Boss 290
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 447
Default

if you would buy i corolla i cant see why you wouldnt like a ford gt...i should try this poll on a car site with no specific brand. i bet the focus might scrape through
Boss 290 is offline  
Old 16-10-2006, 06:10 PM   #155
Boss 290
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 447
Default

the mazda 3 may win it has a great price and looks great but i have never driven one and i cant see it being smoother then the focus
Boss 290 is offline  
Old 16-10-2006, 06:17 PM   #156
9lives
Regular Member
 
9lives's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cronulla,Sydney
Posts: 172
Default

my 2 cents... sportivo 141kw but crappy torque.

Renault Clio 182 cup brilliant
__________________
You must be young and stupid to grow old and wise....
9lives is offline  
Old 16-10-2006, 06:20 PM   #157
9lives
Regular Member
 
9lives's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cronulla,Sydney
Posts: 172
Default

oh **** under 25k new prob impreza...
__________________
You must be young and stupid to grow old and wise....
9lives is offline  
Old 16-10-2006, 06:52 PM   #158
mowog
Discovery 4
 
mowog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9lives
my 2 cents... sportivo 141kw but crappy torque.

Renault Clio 182 cup brilliant
oh my standard arguement look back about 100 posts...
__________________
###
Blue Ranger Wildtrak V6 on the way. Factory Canopy & 140l ARB fuel tank.
Discovery 4 3.0 TDV6 SE. Long range aux tank, Kaymar Rear Bar, 18" Off Road rims.
Lotus Trooper.
Mini Inspired by Goodwood.
mowog is offline  
Old 16-10-2006, 06:57 PM   #159
mowog
Discovery 4
 
mowog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss 290
if you would buy i corolla i cant see why you wouldnt like a ford gt...i should try this poll on a car site with no specific brand. i bet the focus might scrape through
I didnt say that I didnt like the GT I just said I wouldnt buy one big difference.

The Corolla well thats been done to death..

Post the poll on another forum and let us all know where it is. But this time if its new cars make it clear and dont include superceeded cars like the pulsar.
__________________
###
Blue Ranger Wildtrak V6 on the way. Factory Canopy & 140l ARB fuel tank.
Discovery 4 3.0 TDV6 SE. Long range aux tank, Kaymar Rear Bar, 18" Off Road rims.
Lotus Trooper.
Mini Inspired by Goodwood.
mowog is offline  
Old 16-10-2006, 06:58 PM   #160
mowog
Discovery 4
 
mowog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss 290
the mazda 3 may win it has a great price and looks great but i have never driven one and i cant see it being smoother then the focus
If you havent driven it then you cant say...
__________________
###
Blue Ranger Wildtrak V6 on the way. Factory Canopy & 140l ARB fuel tank.
Discovery 4 3.0 TDV6 SE. Long range aux tank, Kaymar Rear Bar, 18" Off Road rims.
Lotus Trooper.
Mini Inspired by Goodwood.
mowog is offline  
Old 16-10-2006, 08:02 PM   #161
Boss 290
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 447
Default

[QUOTE=mowog]If you havent driven it then you cant say..

i think the mazda 3 looks like a great car but from what i know about the focus i cant see it getting any smoother then that...no 1 on this forum has test drove all these cars so expect people to vote on how they feel about the car and what they know....i do like the mazda 3 it looks great and is pretty torquey from what ive heard but does anyone know if it would be smoother then the focus? im comparing the focus to the cars i have driven and the focus won in my eyes. the mazda 3 may drive better but im not prepaired to go and drive every car on the poll to find the answer...the poll is on what people think and if you think your corolla is great then thats what you think
Boss 290 is offline  
Old 16-10-2006, 09:17 PM   #162
9lives
Regular Member
 
9lives's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cronulla,Sydney
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mowog
oh my standard arguement look back about 100 posts...

looks like im a sheep hey... toolbag
__________________
You must be young and stupid to grow old and wise....
9lives is offline  
Old 17-10-2006, 01:13 AM   #163
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by colossus
Where do you get this stuff from? In my experience Honda's have always had extremley good build quality - every comparo I have read praises the Jazz, and has it winning. Granted I don't like the styling of the Jazz but apart from that I think its a worthy competitor in this segment.

If I was the OP and was in the market I'd be buying a Mazda 3 (does everything well, and has good resale) or the Honda Civic (again good resale, but its something a little different in terms of styling, technology ect).
Honda's and extremley good build quality don't go together in the same sentance. Unless you're comparing opposites.

Every single person I know with a Honda older then ~3 years says its a heap (and it is). My first cousin (daughter of my mother's elder sister) has a '93 Civic. It replaced an S13 Silvia which was destroyed in a car accident. It is such a heap of ****, I can't believe she payed so much money for that POS. The body panels are paper thin, you can coax the door into caving in with your index finger. The power windows are horrible... they smash and bash around, they're very noisy and don't do a good job of shutting the window properly. The interior is falling to pieces. Not much of the inside works properly.... the engine, its done less then 100,000km, but sounds and goes like its done 700,000km or more. A horror story.

A good family friend had a new Accord, and after about 4 years, similar horror story. My dad's girlfriend used to have a Prelude a long time ago, that boxy shape, a worse heap then my cousin's Civic.

And the Jazz when we test drove it shopping for my mate's car, well, I can't say I've ever been in a brand new car that felt like it had done 250,000km+ of abused ownership before. The Jazz did.

Magazine reviews can't tell you what a car's like to live with. In fact, they can't tell you much at all except what the person who drove the car thought of it, but then you have to realise that they're going to be biased themselves. I remember laughing at someone who was trying to tell me the Bugatti EB 16/4 Veyron wasn't a good car, based on an article by Gordon Murray - the man who made the McLaren F1. And you know why it was so funny? The whole article was him trying to find a petty way to make his nearly 2 decade older car compare to the Bugatti. Except it doesn't, in any way shape or form. But that's bias.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline  
Old 17-10-2006, 01:14 AM   #164
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

[QUOTE=Boss 290]
Quote:
Originally Posted by mowog
If you havent driven it then you cant say..

i think the mazda 3 looks like a great car but from what i know about the focus i cant see it getting any smoother then that...no 1 on this forum has test drove all these cars so expect people to vote on how they feel about the car and what they know....i do like the mazda 3 it looks great and is pretty torquey from what ive heard but does anyone know if it would be smoother then the focus? im comparing the focus to the cars i have driven and the focus won in my eyes. the mazda 3 may drive better but im not prepaired to go and drive every car on the poll to find the answer...the poll is on what people think and if you think your corolla is great then thats what you think
Under the skin they're identical. Same chassis, engine, suspension, brakes, wheel size, tyre size (probably the same tyre), gearbox etc etc. I'd be surprised if they felt any different to each other.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline  
Old 17-10-2006, 07:06 AM   #165
mowog
Discovery 4
 
mowog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9lives
looks like im a sheep hey... toolbag
You are something thats for sure... :lookedat:
__________________
###
Blue Ranger Wildtrak V6 on the way. Factory Canopy & 140l ARB fuel tank.
Discovery 4 3.0 TDV6 SE. Long range aux tank, Kaymar Rear Bar, 18" Off Road rims.
Lotus Trooper.
Mini Inspired by Goodwood.
mowog is offline  
Old 17-10-2006, 03:14 PM   #166
Boss 290
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steffo
Under the skin they're identical. Same chassis, engine, suspension, brakes, wheel size, tyre size (probably the same tyre), gearbox etc etc. I'd be surprised if they felt any different to each other.
so the mada 3 is the same as a focus? how can this be? do ford own mazda?
Boss 290 is offline  
Old 17-10-2006, 03:50 PM   #167
Bucket
XR5 Pilot
 
Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth, Ex NSW
Posts: 1,455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss 290
so the mada 3 is the same as a focus? how can this be? do ford own mazda?
Yes, the Ford Premier Auto Group own Mazda, Aston Martin, Jaguar Lincoln and Volvo (just to name a few) i think there are one or two more.

The Mazdsa 3 and the (i think) S40 are both on the same platform as the Focus
__________________
'08 Ford Mondeo XR5 in Thunder
Bucket is offline  
Old 17-10-2006, 05:43 PM   #168
Boss 290
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 447
Default

so why do they allow the mazda sp23 to have the fastest frontwheel car....why not make the xr5t faster? wouldnt they want the ford name to rule the roost?
Boss 290 is offline  
Old 17-10-2006, 06:23 PM   #169
mowog
Discovery 4
 
mowog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,239
Default

An interesting review on some of the class of car being talked about in this thread.

http://www.drive.com.au/Editorial/Ar...ID=19019&vf=15

Verdict

Comparison tests are by their nature ruthless affairs. The weak are quickly exposed and dispatched, so you might like to send the kiddies out while we do the initial axe work.

Despite significant improvements, it's difficult to find a compelling reason to consider the Proton.

If you just want reliable, honest A-to-B transport at the lowest possible price, with minimal regular costs, the Getz and the Rio will do the job. However, for not much more money you can get a more contemporary, enjoyable and better built car.

Now the culling process becomes more difficult, because the cars themselves are quite different and have individual attributes that will appeal to different buyers.

The Polo is safe and solid, but relatively expensive, underpowered and under-equipped in this company. If you can justify the premium price and aren't looking for a rocket ship, you'd be happy in one of these.

The Fiesta, like the Polo, requires premium unleaded but you get no tangible performance benefit compared with others that run on regular. It's also likely to have higher maintenance costs. Otherwise, the Fiesta is a good thing and much better value than when it was launched.

The made-in-Japan Colt has the longest warranty and a frugal thirst. It has a relatively roomy cabin but a small boot. The Mazda 2 has also been freshened up and it too exemplifies Japanese quality and attention to detail in a spacious, comfortable package. But it's noisy by class standards and that can become irritating after a while.

Third place goes to the Suzuki Swift. It's well equipped for the money and drives sweetly; on the debit side, occupant space is tight. It slips from its former No. 1 spot because of a stronger performance from the Honda Jazz and Toyota Yaris than for any significant weaknesses on its part.

The big price reduction on the Jazz lifts its value-for-money quotient to give it second place. Its space efficiency, comfort and brilliant interior design give you big-car versatility with small-car economy from the high-tech 1.3-litre engine and CVT drivetrain.

Since our comparison last October, in which the Yaris came second, it has achieved five stars out of five (with side airbags) in Euro NCAP tests. In a small car, you need all the crash protection you can get, so this is decisive.

The four members of the Drive team who went around (and around) our test loop in every car rated the Yaris an exceptionally comfortable and refined device. Performance, dynamics and fuel efficiency are exemplary. Its interior design is practical, innovative and impossibly cute.

Factor in the Toyota trifecta of quality, reliability and durability, and the Yaris clinches the top slot.
__________________
###
Blue Ranger Wildtrak V6 on the way. Factory Canopy & 140l ARB fuel tank.
Discovery 4 3.0 TDV6 SE. Long range aux tank, Kaymar Rear Bar, 18" Off Road rims.
Lotus Trooper.
Mini Inspired by Goodwood.
mowog is offline  
Old 20-10-2006, 12:30 PM   #170
Boss 290
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 447
Default

ok the results are in...and the winner is the focus and followed closely by the mazda 3. great result for the mazda, especially being on the ford site
Boss 290 is offline  
Old 20-10-2006, 06:36 PM   #171
Bucket
XR5 Pilot
 
Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth, Ex NSW
Posts: 1,455
Default

Focus is my Choice too mate...I'll be putting an order on a 2007 Model Focus Zetec in Black Sapphire for Pick up in February this December.. Can't wait
__________________
'08 Ford Mondeo XR5 in Thunder
Bucket is offline  
Old 20-10-2006, 07:38 PM   #172
Rev28K
re
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Victoria - where being slow & incompetent is considered being "safe"
Posts: 1,323
Default

You forgot to add the Renault Clio to your poll. The runout models would be good value…
__________________
Scuderia Rev: Otto the tow pig - 2007 3.0 litre Coupé, vernünftig schnelle aber kein peilstab, Bathurst 2007 und 2010 zwölf Stunde Gewinner Jaffa the angry ant - mid 70's Honda 市民の, 73 と立方インチ LSD Elle "the body" shell - early 70's Datsun フェアレディ coupe. いい体は彼女の内側、内側と土台を待つ
Rev28K is offline  
Old 26-10-2006, 11:47 PM   #173
Kardae
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucket
Focus is my Choice too mate...I'll be putting an order on a 2007 Model Focus Zetec in Black Sapphire for Pick up in February this December.. Can't wait
Is 2007 Model any different? Juz curious as I am about to get one myself...
Kardae is offline  
Old 27-10-2006, 08:12 AM   #174
merlin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,974
Default

Meh = Focus look great, but they are underpowered in this segment IMO. Mazda 3 has better drivability, resale and reliability. Don't know why you would go the Focus.
__________________
1966 Ford Mustang coupe. 347 stroker, PA reverse manual C4, TCE high stall converter, B&M Pro Ratchet, Edelbrock alum heads, Edelbrock intake manifold, MSD ignition, Holley Street HP 750 CFM carb, gilmer drive, wrapped Hooker Super Comp Headers, dual 3" straight through exhaust, Bilstein shocks, custom springs, full poly suspension, American Racing rims, Open Tracker roller spring saddles and shelby drop.

Still to go - Holley Sniper EFI with integrated fuel cell.
merlin is offline  
Old 27-10-2006, 08:54 AM   #175
photn
AFF Post NAZI
 
photn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albury
Posts: 3,634
Default

think about it this way. if you have a car that is good at everything, has everything that will ever want and does everything the Best.......who will buy the other cars????

if the focus was the best and had the best of the best stuff no one would buy mazda.....by splitting the options and so on they keep interest in both manufacturers......
__________________
"Its not always about power, The car has to handle Beautifully"

photn is offline  
Old 30-10-2006, 02:18 AM   #176
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merlin
Meh = Focus look great, but they are underpowered in this segment IMO. Mazda 3 has better drivability, resale and reliability. Don't know why you would go the Focus.
I find this interesting. How can it have better reliability when they are the exact same car? The same 2.0 Duratec 4cyl, the same chassis, the same manual and automatic gearboxes, the same suspension, the same brakes, hell, the wheels & tyres are even the same specification. And on that note, how can the driveability be better - when its the exact same car?

Oh and as for being underpowered, there's a 1kW difference between the current Mazda 3 (108kW) and the Focus (107kW), and the pre-minor update Mazda 3's had 104kW. Though it is the exact same 2.0 Duratec engine, with an ECU tweak here or there.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline  
Old 30-10-2006, 08:40 AM   #177
merlin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,974
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steffo
I find this interesting. How can it have better reliability when they are the exact same car? The same 2.0 Duratec 4cyl, the same chassis, the same manual and automatic gearboxes, the same suspension, the same brakes, hell, the wheels & tyres are even the same specification. And on that note, how can the driveability be better - when its the exact same car?

Oh and as for being underpowered, there's a 1kW difference between the current Mazda 3 (108kW) and the Focus (107kW), and the pre-minor update Mazda 3's had 104kW. Though it is the exact same 2.0 Duratec engine, with an ECU tweak here or there.
They may share a lot of components but they are far from being exactly the same car in the way they are set-up and drive. Not that I have anything in paticular against the Focus I just think the 3 is a better buy.

My experience at the motor show only confiremed this further for me when I sat in all grades of the Focus and Mazda 3 - all I can say is that the Focus interior is appaling - grey plastic, giant grey radio that looks like it is from an '80s Corolla, unsupportive flat shopping trolley seats. Compared to even the base model Mazda 3 Neo the Neo had very nice looking tacho, speedo set-up, futuristic/stylish black centre console with digital readouts in the upper dash ect., storage bins everywhere - just looked so far ahead in every way. You had to step up to the Focus Ghia to get any sort of decent interior (which by the way was really just white leather seats) and by then you were looking at low $30k's for a small hatch and still couldnt shake that 1980's centre radio.

The Focus XR5T had a pretty nice interior though but that was $35K and way out of budget of what the OP wants.

PS - Speaking of dodgy boring grey plastic interiors with 1980's radios can anyone say VW Golf GTI - yuck...I dont know how it gets so much praise and is popular - its not even quick by hot hatch standards...a big meh from me!
__________________
1966 Ford Mustang coupe. 347 stroker, PA reverse manual C4, TCE high stall converter, B&M Pro Ratchet, Edelbrock alum heads, Edelbrock intake manifold, MSD ignition, Holley Street HP 750 CFM carb, gilmer drive, wrapped Hooker Super Comp Headers, dual 3" straight through exhaust, Bilstein shocks, custom springs, full poly suspension, American Racing rims, Open Tracker roller spring saddles and shelby drop.

Still to go - Holley Sniper EFI with integrated fuel cell.
merlin is offline  
Old 30-10-2006, 06:44 PM   #178
1TUFFUTE
Banned
 
1TUFFUTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ipswich QLD
Posts: 4,697
Default

who the hell picked the lancer
1TUFFUTE is offline  
Old 30-10-2006, 07:45 PM   #179
#Russ#Es#
Hello Koni's!
 
#Russ#Es#'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Sydney
Posts: 762
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: This member has made a few valuable contributions to the Forum in the Focus section, seems to know exactly what he is talking about with his posts, which are helpful and concise. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merlin
grey plastic, giant grey radio that looks like it is from an '80s Corolla
Thats an easy fix...who keeps the standard factory headunit anyway? Oh sorry, BA/BF owners :
__________________
2006 LX FOCUS SEDAN
Titanium Grey, factory bodykit, slightly debadged
CSA Motorvatr 17's/Kumho KU31's, Eibach Prokit/Lovells rear springs, Koni Sports Kit
Lower airbox removed, K&N Panel filter
Momo gear knob + boot + pedals, Ghia boot garnish, Zetec Chrome interior door handles
JVC KW-XR816 Headunit + more to come...

#Russ#Es# is offline  
Old 30-10-2006, 10:48 PM   #180
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merlin
PS - Speaking of dodgy boring grey plastic interiors with 1980's radios can anyone say VW Golf GTI - yuck...I dont know how it gets so much praise and is popular - its not even quick by hot hatch standards...a big meh from me!
How can anyone not like the feel of a Golf interior? All it takes to notice the difference (re - world benchmark quality) is to sit in the GTI then its competitors (XR5 Turbo, Megane 225 etc). I was at the motorshow today, and well, I was unimpressed by the XR5's interior. In all seriousness, my WP Fiesta Zetec feels like a more expensive car inside, and its often complained about seats are way better. The stupid XR5 seat is very narrow, one of the bolster things is directly under my thigh/bottom. Have to sit all weird in it to get anything remotely comfortable. The leather on the wheel felt like it was plastic and the dash was pretty bad feeling.

The Golf... it doesn't feel like a $39,990 car. It feels like a $139,990 car. They're not praied without reason. And then there's also the fact that the interior... stays together (so does the whole car but...). After a decade everything will still work, and still feel like it did when it was new. Few cars can lay claim to that, even some that are supposedly world-leading (try a 10+ yr old Lexus out and prepare to be unimpressed at the leather that's gone hard and started cracking, rattles, squeaks, and little switches that don't work properly anymore).
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline  
Closed Thread


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL