Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > Non Ford Related Community Forums > The Bar

The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29-11-2020, 07:02 AM   #211
ThaFlash
Trusted Seller
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Franganastan
Posts: 909
Default Re: Ambitious China

CANZUK (new super power and new world order booohahahah)

send in the SAS-R legends badaboombadabing!
ThaFlash is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2020, 06:51 AM   #212
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,584
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by roKWiz View Post
Thats why their buildings like falling over, due to their cost cutting measures.
Id imagine the major stuff is getting better, main difference IMO would be cheaper and more plentiful labor who will work to the bones.

Its not necessary a good thing, just the difference in H&S.
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 07:00 AM   #213
roKWiz
Cabover nut
 
roKWiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Onsite Eastcoast
Posts: 11,270
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polyal View Post
Id imagine the major stuff is getting better, main difference IMO would be cheaper and more plentiful labor who will work to the bones.

Its not necessary a good thing, just the difference in H&S.
I was referring more so to the concrete testing and building materials being crap, like some of non certified stuff they try to sneak past Australian building suppliers.
__________________
heritagestonemason.com/Fordlouisvillerestoration
In order that the labour of centuries past may not be in vain during the centuries to come...... D. Diderot 1752

roKWiz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 07:14 AM   #214
Citroënbender
DIY Tragic
 
Citroënbender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sydney, more than not. I hate it.
Posts: 22,356
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: Your outstanding contributions to this community have not gone unnoticed. IN my view you are a worthy recipient of the (rarely used) Chairman's Award. 
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
We plan for today and tomorrow, China plan for the next 10 or 15 years.
This is endemic! It may have started from governments wanting to look good with runs on the board at election time, but it’s trickled down to personal thought and discipline.
Citroënbender is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 01:13 PM   #215
Mr_G6ET
Ford G6ET FG MkII
 
Mr_G6ET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: W.A Cap. Nth. Sub.
Posts: 485
Default Re: Ambitious China

Estimate the new aircraft carrier with electromagnetic (EM) catapults, ready by 2025, I think they will faster than western estimates.

Read the story here
Mr_G6ET is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2020, 01:27 PM   #216
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,584
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_G6ET View Post
Estimate the new aircraft carrier with electromagnetic (EM) catapults, ready by 2025, I think they will faster than western estimates.

Read the story here
Well...there is our iron ore...LOL

Any nation would have to have rocks in their heads these days to start a serious war. It will be a ****ing contest but still not great, but, the west has been building for ages so as if they will sit there and do nothing.
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2020, 08:20 PM   #217
nstg8a
3..2..1..
 
nstg8a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bellbird park
Posts: 7,218
Default Re: Ambitious China

So what do the Chinese apologists say about this?

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by pottery beige View Post
Happy mcgadget meal orphan mcboofhead
nstg8a is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
5 users like this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 08:41 PM   #218
T3rminator
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
T3rminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,918
Default Re: Ambitious China

Some interesting comments from subscribers......

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia...30-p56j4p.html

This tit for tat is about to get a whole lot uglier. They have openly said they are coming after our human rights record, namely treatment of refugees and the indigenous community.

The problem is, China's human rights record has been laid bare for all to see, so really, there is nothing that is going to shock the international community. But we may have a few skeletons we want to keep in the closet. A propaganda war is going to get very very ugly for both sides. IMHO.

I also think its a slight over-reaction. PM was probably better to have just said a few words, then deal with it in private. Instead, he has drawn everyone's attention to the tweet. Its just a dumb *** tweet. Twitter hasn't blocked it either.

Once again, diplomacy through the media is probably not the best option.

I see Russia has joined the chorus. We are playing in the big league now, better get used to it.
T3rminator is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2020, 08:47 PM   #219
superyob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,811
Default Re: Ambitious China

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-54277430

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-...-says/11219144
superyob is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 08:48 PM   #220
GasoLane
Former BTIKD
Donating Member2
 
GasoLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sunny Downtown Wagga Wagga. NSW.
Posts: 53,197
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by T3rminator View Post
I also think its a slight over-reaction. PM was probably better to have just said a few words, then deal with it in private. Instead, he has drawn everyone's attention to the tweet. Its just a dumb *** tweet. Twitter hasn't blocked it either.
Maybe an over reaction if it was just another nondescript tweet from China, but this was from China's Foreign Ministry spokesman, who is supposed to be a Diplomat!
__________________
Dying at your job is natures way of saying that you're in the wrong line of work.
GasoLane is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2020, 08:52 PM   #221
MITCHAY
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,434
Default Re: Ambitious China

I won't be taking any lectures from China and Russia about human rights. That's really taking the ****.
MITCHAY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
6 users like this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 09:08 PM   #222
T3rminator
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
T3rminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,918
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by MITCHAY View Post
I won't be taking any lectures from China and Russia about human rights. That's really taking the ****.
You don't have to. But that's not the name of the game. The message is not targeting Australians or its close allies. They are trying to discredit us in the eyes of those sitting on the fence (think Pacific Islands and ASEAN) and will probably use it as propaganda with our "enemies".

Really, is it that different to some of the stuff that comes out of Trump and Pompeo? They are playing the same game. Don't fall for it!

Scotty needs hire a some tactical specialists to deal with this situation. I don't like the sounds of getting into information warfare with Russia and China.
T3rminator is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2020, 09:10 PM   #223
Pis-ton broke
Banned
 
Pis-ton broke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,621
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by T3rminator View Post

I also think its a slight over-reaction. PM was probably better to have just said a few words, then deal with it in private. Instead, he has drawn everyone's attention to the tweet. Its just a dumb *** tweet. Twitter hasn't blocked it either.

are you serious? whos SIDE ARE YOU ON?

grow a back bone!
Pis-ton broke is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
7 users like this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 09:19 PM   #224
Itsme
Experienced Member
 
Itsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australasia
Posts: 7,660
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by T3rminator View Post
Some interesting comments from subscribers......

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia...30-p56j4p.html

This tit for tat is about to get a whole lot uglier. They have openly said they are coming after our human rights record, namely treatment of refugees and the indigenous community.

The problem is, China's human rights record has been laid bare for all to see, so really, there is nothing that is going to shock the international community. But we may have a few skeletons we want to keep in the closet. A propaganda war is going to get very very ugly for both sides. IMHO.

I also think its a slight over-reaction. PM was probably better to have just said a few words, then deal with it in private. Instead, he has drawn everyone's attention to the tweet. Its just a dumb *** tweet. Twitter hasn't blocked it either.

Once again, diplomacy through the media is probably not the best option.

I see Russia has joined the chorus. We are playing in the big league now, better get used to it.
I applaud our PM for his reaction and my reaction to China is F*** them if they want to play dirty and show their real colours.
They are just hypocrites!
Itsme is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
5 users like this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 09:38 PM   #225
Citroënbender
DIY Tragic
 
Citroënbender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sydney, more than not. I hate it.
Posts: 22,356
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: Your outstanding contributions to this community have not gone unnoticed. IN my view you are a worthy recipient of the (rarely used) Chairman's Award. 
Default Re: Ambitious China

Unfortunately I fear people in government here and elsewhere are being sucked into Trumpian politics; “me vs you” type adversarial exchanges with added childish petulance.
Citroënbender is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
6 users like this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 09:47 PM   #226
nstg8a
3..2..1..
 
nstg8a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bellbird park
Posts: 7,218
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by T3rminator View Post
Its just a dumb *** tweet. .
There’s nothing really wrong with the wording, it’s the imagery they’ve created and the fact that it wasn’t posted by some lowly Chinese public servant.

Make no mistake, this is a pretty big escalation.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by pottery beige View Post
Happy mcgadget meal orphan mcboofhead
nstg8a is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 09:56 PM   #227
T3rminator
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
T3rminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,918
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citroënbender View Post
Unfortunately I fear people in government here and elsewhere are being sucked into Trumpian politics; “me vs you” type adversarial exchanges with added childish petulance.
I knew my opinion would trigger a few, as it has previously on this topic. I disagree with the PM's tactic and suddenly its "pick a side". It is amusing avid Trumpians come on sprouting about "sides". You know, MAGA, make another country great again. Hows that working out for AUSTRALIANs?

Like I said, we are in the big league now. Time to use our brain. Another article, and again, the comments........ Maybe all chinese bots.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia....html#comments
T3rminator is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 10:00 PM   #228
Pis-ton broke
Banned
 
Pis-ton broke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,621
Default Re: Ambitious China

i've seen the doctored picture of an Australian soldier cutting the child's throat, personally to me, the picture is very offensive. and to have a once great nation china post this from a ccp authority is disrespectful.
i,m not going to say anything else, cause this gets me hot under collar.

once again i say t3, whos side are you on, yes there is a side, cause that's the way its all turning out, i,m not going to get sucked into your semantics.
Pis-ton broke is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 10:20 PM   #229
Citroënbender
DIY Tragic
 
Citroënbender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sydney, more than not. I hate it.
Posts: 22,356
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: Your outstanding contributions to this community have not gone unnoticed. IN my view you are a worthy recipient of the (rarely used) Chairman's Award. 
Default Re: Ambitious China

I am disappointed in Twitter, it’s not helping perceptions of a double standard.
Citroënbender is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 10:37 PM   #230
T3rminator
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
T3rminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,918
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pis-ton broke View Post
i've seen the doctored picture of an Australian soldier cutting the child's throat, personally to me, the picture is very offensive. and to have a once great nation china post this from a ccp authority is disrespectful.
i,m not going to say anything else, cause this gets me hot under collar.

once again i say t3, whos side are you on, yes there is a side, cause that's the way its all turning out, i,m not going to get sucked into your semantics.
Ok Eric. You are not going to say anything else but you will anyway....?

Last time I play your games. I'm on the side that gets the best outcome for Australia. But I'm not on your side. Lets see if you can work that one out.
T3rminator is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 11:10 PM   #231
Itsme
Experienced Member
 
Itsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australasia
Posts: 7,660
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by T3rminator View Post
I knew my opinion would trigger a few, as it has previously on this topic. I disagree with the PM's tactic and suddenly its "pick a side". It is amusing avid Trumpians come on sprouting about "sides". You know, MAGA, make another country great again. Hows that working out for AUSTRALIANs?

Like I said, we are in the big league now. Time to use our brain. Another article, and again, the comments........ Maybe all chinese bots.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia....html#comments
Ok you say our PM is wrong in his tactic then please explain to all of us what our PM should have said or done?
Itsme is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2020, 11:32 PM   #232
T3rminator
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
T3rminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,918
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by Officemanager View Post
Ok you say our PM is wrong in his tactic then please explain to all of us what our PM should have said or done?
I would have made a short and sharp statement. Point to the fact that the war crimes were self reported, and a free and democratic society that values human life will put the allegations to trial. And point to how we handle it differently to some of their human rights abuse. Done. But he fell for the bait and its now international headlines.

I think this guy sums it up well...

"Herve Lemahieu, director of the power and diplomacy program at the Lowy Institute, said Mr Morrison should not have responded to the "smear" and "low-blow" from a relatively junior Chinese official on Twitter.

He said Australia's response was "overly emotive and defensive" and played right into China's hands.

"We shouldn't deploy our top asset - head of government - to respond to a propaganda post from some junior level official in the Chinese Foreign Ministry. These guys seek attention and we have given it to them," Mr Lemahieu said.

"I would describe it as a smear and a sub-tweet, and I didn't think it merited a response from the Prime Minister. It's beneath the Prime Minister to have to react to that."

Mr Lemahieu said he believed the tweet was used as "bait to lure a response", and also to switch the debate from China's "blatant violation of the economic rules-based order" by imposing unfair tariffs on Australia.

"That [the tariffs] is the big story, and to me it looks like they are trying to switch the subjects and make Australia look like the villain. We shouldn't have fallen for it," he said."
T3rminator is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
4 users like this post:
Old 30-11-2020, 11:49 PM   #233
nstg8a
3..2..1..
 
nstg8a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bellbird park
Posts: 7,218
Default Re: Ambitious China




While Australia certainly has plenty of human rights skeletons in its closet, it’s a mere fraction of chinas.


This is a litmus test of western resolve... how will we fare I wonder.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by pottery beige View Post
Happy mcgadget meal orphan mcboofhead
nstg8a is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 01-12-2020, 12:13 AM   #234
asagaai
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
asagaai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 1,790
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by nstg8a View Post
So what do the Chinese apologists say about this?

image
As others have said, the text is not controversial- the picture is demeaning- of China- given the context.

The rest of the world sees that yes- Australia is accountable, that is why we had the Brereton INQUIRY- and gave transparent findings. China does not understand the word Inquiry- or should that be Covid 19 Inquiry.

And yes- Australia will hold the offending soldiers accountable, following due process and procedurally just trials. Something again China could learn from- our procedurally fair institutions.

But this insensitive created image from the highest levels of Chinese government is a serious escalation make no mistake.

I also think Australia has to draw I line in the sand- fundamental issues of independence of Australia, things like imposing controls on foreign ownership of strategic purchases in Australia, and banning of foreign owned telco rolling out strategic information networks like 5g and Huawei, (some of Chinas grievances ) and if we sell out now for the quick dollar and to avoid immediate pain, we will be selling out our children and grandchildrens futures in Australia.
__________________
Ford Rides:

Ford Fiesta ST Mk 8 -daily- closest thing to a go kart on road for under 50K

FG X XR8 smoke manual - Miami hand built masterpiece by David Winter, BMC Filter, JLT Oil separators, Street Fighter Intercooler Stage 2, crushed ball, running 15% E85 and 85% 98- weekender

Last edited by asagaai; 01-12-2020 at 12:24 AM.
asagaai is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-12-2020, 05:56 AM   #235
Fordman1
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
Fordman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,800
Default Re: Ambitious China

Quote:
Originally Posted by T3rminator View Post
I would have made a short and sharp statement. Point to the fact that the war crimes were self reported, and a free and democratic society that values human life will put the allegations to trial. And point to how we handle it differently to some of their human rights abuse. Done. But he fell for the bait and its now international headlines.

I think this guy sums it up well...

"Herve Lemahieu, director of the power and diplomacy program at the Lowy Institute, said Mr Morrison should not have responded to the "smear" and "low-blow" from a relatively junior Chinese official on Twitter.

He said Australia's response was "overly emotive and defensive" and played right into China's hands.

"We shouldn't deploy our top asset - head of government - to respond to a propaganda post from some junior level official in the Chinese Foreign Ministry. These guys seek attention and we have given it to them," Mr Lemahieu said.

"I would describe it as a smear and a sub-tweet, and I didn't think it merited a response from the Prime Minister. It's beneath the Prime Minister to have to react to that."

Mr Lemahieu said he believed the tweet was used as "bait to lure a response", and also to switch the debate from China's "blatant violation of the economic rules-based order" by imposing unfair tariffs on Australia.

"That [the tariffs] is the big story, and to me it looks like they are trying to switch the subjects and make Australia look like the villain. We shouldn't have fallen for it," he said."
^^^ This

“We self reported, we are following these allegations through legal channels in our Democratic system (unlike the systems of some unnamed non democratic countries). If the allegations are proven in a court of law, those found guilty will be dealt with as appropriate”

End of statement, no further comment.
Fordman1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 01-12-2020, 06:25 AM   #236
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,584
Default Re: Ambitious China

Should I be surprised that the Trump supporters have the pitch forks out again?

AusGov needs to seriously stop using bloody Twitter...thats what is embarrassing.

We asked for some focus if we were going to publicize the Defense findings, but, the tweet from "China" is below the belt. But you do not start directly attacking someone who is being immature, it only brings you down to their level.

Those in the international community with half a brain will see through it, so AusGov needs to follow this path.

We put our hand up, we are dealing with the wrongs, AusGov needs to say "shows us your process" to China if they want to start throwing mud.

Dont point out all their issues, most are known anyway. Time to take the moral high ground because its just a stupid photoshop done by some smart ****.

I dont think you will find many that are OK with China's antics at the moment, but you dont cut your nose off despite your face, keep the eye on the bigger goal and that should be working with other markets and strengthening ties with others.

This is were you need your allies to also back you up in a professional matter, throwing fuel on the fire wont help.
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane

Last edited by Polyal; 01-12-2020 at 06:55 AM.
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-12-2020, 07:55 AM   #237
Citroënbender
DIY Tragic
 
Citroënbender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sydney, more than not. I hate it.
Posts: 22,356
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: Your outstanding contributions to this community have not gone unnoticed. IN my view you are a worthy recipient of the (rarely used) Chairman's Award. 
Default Re: Ambitious China

Indeed, re the idea of engaging proactively with other countries rather than falling prey to divisive politics so comprehensively it obscures the possibility of other actions.

How much of the suddenly-heavily-surtaxed goods were unladed (either in bulk storage, bonded, or in distribution channels) when this was determined? It’s a serious question and I’ve not seen a complete answer illuminated. It should partially inform the government’s response.
Citroënbender is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-12-2020, 09:24 AM   #238
Trevor 57
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Trevor 57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,752
Default Re: Ambitious China

I have to say I am no fan of ScoMo, but I was impressed about what he said about the Chinese tweet. They are international bullies, some of their human rights breaches are abysmal, as is Russia's

It is well accepted that the best way to fix bullies is to stand up to them and make them accountable, exactly what ScoMo did
__________________
I reserve the right to arm bears
Trevor 57 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
4 users like this post:
Old 01-12-2020, 10:00 AM   #239
superyob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,811
Default Re: Ambitious China

Don't criticise multiculturalism. Must NOT criticise multiculturalism. Or immigration. Or diversity. Or any of the marxist's unicorns that have made Australia weak in the eyes of her enemies and a laughing stock...

Still waiting the Mongols to flagellate themselves for Ghengis Khan. Islamic caliphates to repent of their murderous shenanigans. African tribes to dress in sack cloth and ashes for enslaving each other on an industrial scale. Bolshevik communists to shed a tear for the barbaric murders of untold millions. How about that naughty Mao? Surely the Chinese are suffering guilt seizures for the multi millions murdered?

No??? Oh dear...
superyob is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-12-2020, 10:01 AM   #240
superyob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,811
Default Re: Ambitious China

repeat post...
superyob is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL