Countdown to new LPG I6 - Page 8

Bossxr8 · 27-03-2011, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobman

I guess that's why they hand-built the last of the old V8s in the AUIII? It was too a dead duck.

Totally different story, Ford had too given the Gen III's sudden power hike over the 304. GP knew they needed to match Holden in the power war.

No need for that with the I6.

Its pretty clear from inside the engine plant that this is its last generation.

Resurrection · 27-03-2011, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bossxr8

Being different to the petrol engine it will need a new calibration no matter what, they can't just load a petrol auto calibration into it and expect it to work 100%. It doesn't work that way, with different torque graphs and emissions tuning etc.

Correct.

Buntz · 28-03-2011, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Road_Warrior

In fairness to that "dead duck", they still made improvements to the I6 even after the engine plant closure was announced, unless those improvements were already approved and in the product plan. So there may be some further improvements and refinements ahead, but I don't think it will be anything substantial.

And realistically, short of going to an alloy block and direct injection, what more can they do to an engine that is basically at the top of its game?

It's at the top of it's market. Not it's game. It could seriously do with coming into the 21st century... and then leap frog the US's V6's.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bossxr8

Its the rear end that becomes the weak link in a high power LPi setup as it runs the standard NA 6 version, not the heavier duty turbo/V8 version, which is more expensive, and won't be used to keep the costs of the LPG option down. Durability will be fine for the lower power tune they have chosen.

There is no current date for the Euro 5 emissions start date, the government is still debating it.

I don't think the I6 will get anything new after FG2, it will more than likely carry through to 2015/16 as it is. They won't spend money on a dead duck when the production figures are getting so low. 190 a day is chicken feed, it was like 480 a day during BA, thats a massive drop and has more than likely sealed its fate as those numbers aren't viable long term.

So like I said. A proper tuned LPG with the Turbo trans clutch pack could be viable as a performance LPG option. EcoXR6? or ER6?

jpd80 · 28-03-2011, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobman

I guess that's why they hand-built the last of the old V8s in the AUIII? It was too a dead duck.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bossxr8

Totally different story, Ford had too given the Gen III's sudden power hike over the 304. GP knew they needed to match Holden in the power war.

No need for that with the I6.

Its pretty clear from inside the engine plant that this is its last generation.

Thanks for the intel Boss.....

Since our young friend doesn't have the kahunies, I'll do it

Speculator!!!
Speculator!!!
Speculator!!!

Buntz · 28-03-2011, 03:44 PM

Seriously... where do people get these definitive claims from, "relating" to the inner workings of Ford departments?

jpd80 · 28-03-2011, 03:59 PM

Be careful certain people lurk on here, avoid direct questions.

Buntz · 28-03-2011, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpd80

Be careful certain people lurk on here, avoid direct questions.

That just shits me even more.

Bobman · 28-03-2011, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpd80

Be careful certain people lurk on here, avoid direct questions.

Engine plant guys were saying the same thing in 2008. Look what happened!

jpd80 · 28-03-2011, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobman

Engine plant guys were saying the same thing in 2008. Look what happened!

To be positive,
1) the I-6 isn't going anywhere just yet.
2) FG II is out later this year
3) ^^I'd expect a good three years out of it.

That's nearly Four years, anything can happen in that time.

Buntz · 28-03-2011, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpd80

To be positive,

GASWAGON · 28-03-2011, 08:58 PM

All i can say is.... 'it's about bloody time'!!! Good (lucky) timing in just the nick of time along with the Econetic on the floor now and Ecoboost out next year.... All these 'ECO" names should sell very well.... Very tempted to update to the last/best model made..

Road_Warrior · 28-03-2011, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpd80

That's nearly Four years, anything can happen in that time.

Well that electric water pump that we've mentioned a few times might make an appearance. Would reduce parasitic drag on the motor and make it more fuel efficient too.

But a factory LPI XR6 Turbo would be the coolest.

Buntz · 28-03-2011, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Road_Warrior

Well that electric water pump that we've mentioned a few times might make an appearance. Would reduce parasitic drag on the motor and make it more fuel efficient too.

But a factory LPI XR6 Turbo would be the coolest.

Electric steering on some Territory models isn't there? It's been rumoured for Falcon.

Paxton · 28-03-2011, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buntz93ED

Electric steering on some Territory models isn't there? It's been rumoured for Falcon.

Nope. Won't fit.

Buntz · 28-03-2011, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paxton

Nope. Won't fit.

Really? Must be big units. Good thing too. Nothings feels better than a engine driven hydraulic pump.

JPFS1 · 29-03-2011, 12:39 AM

EPAS in Territory feels fine to me.

Bobman · 29-03-2011, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buntz93ED

Really? Must be big units. Good thing too. Nothings feels better than a engine driven hydraulic pump.

I agree, however I've driven a Yaris and it didn't feel too bad with the electric steering control.

It's a bit like Boeing vs Airbus when Airbus introduced 'fly by wire' with no mechanical link between the controls and the wings. Some pilots hated it but most are used to it by now and even Boeing has adapted that technology into its newer planes.

jpd80 · 29-03-2011, 07:00 AM

Except that this isn't steer by wire and there is still a mechanical linkage to the wheels.
Hence the name EPASS = Electronic Powers Assisted Steering.

Like most things new it is treated with suspicion until we realise that it
works fine, I doubt that most people will pick the difference or even care.

Chilliman · 29-03-2011, 09:54 AM

EPAS seems to work fine in Mustang

Buntz · 29-03-2011, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpd80

Except that this isn't steer by wire and there is still a mechanical linkage to the wheels.
Hence the name EPASS = Electronic Powers Assisted Steering.

Like most things new it is treated with suspicion until we realise that it
works fine, I doubt that most people will pick the difference or even care.

I suppose. Plus you won't get those errant shudders anymore... or noise at full lock on aging pumps.

**Polyal** · 29-03-2011, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buntz93ED

Seriously... where do people get these definitive claims from, "relating" to the inner workings of Ford departments?

Your enthusiasm is great, but perhaps reading a bit more and posting less in the short term will help you find out who seems to know a little more than others, we aren't all on the opposite side of the county in relation to Ford.

Buntz · 29-03-2011, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polyal

Your enthusiasm is great, but perhaps reading a bit more and posting less in the short term will help you find out who seems to know a little more than others, we aren't all on the opposite side of the county in relation to Ford.

I'm slowly figuring it out. With help from another member.

WOTDAH · 29-03-2011, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpd80

Like most things new it is treated with suspicion until we realise that it
works fine, I doubt that most people will pick the difference or even care.

EPAS is in the new Territory is great and most people will pick the difference especially existing Territory drivers.

Buntz · 30-03-2011, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOTDAH

EPAS is in the new Territory is great and most people will pick the difference especially existing Territory drivers.

I suppose the computer controlled resistance provides much smoother high speed turning?

WOTDAH · 30-03-2011, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buntz93ED

I suppose the computer controlled resistance provides much smoother high speed turning?

Yes it does. I currently drive a SY2 Terry and the difference is very noticeable. The car fell more 'solid' on the road and not as twitchy at high speeds but very light steering at low speeds.

Back to LPG. Quite a few LPG's have been built in the last week or so all in FG guise. I have heard alot of good talk about it, even the fact that the rear end of the Ute (diff) is having problem handling the torque. I believe an upgrade to the standard diff is on the books.

Bobman · 30-03-2011, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOTDAH

I believe an upgrade to the standard diff is on the books.

Hopefully they fix the diff bush problem as well (unless something has changed recently).

WOTDAH · 30-03-2011, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobman

Hopefully they fix the diff bush problem as well (unless something has changed recently).

The diff bush is on sedan (IRS) I was referring to the UTE. The IRS can handle a 335kw GT so I doubt the LPG I6 will destroy it.

PoweredByCNG · 30-03-2011, 11:22 PM

I have heard rumours of another major problem that may delay Ford's EcoLPI engine indefinitely. Those who are in the know about the Australian LPG industry would know what I'm on about...

Road_Warrior · 30-03-2011, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PoweredByCNG

I have heard rumours of another major problem that may delay Ford's EcoLPI engine indefinitely. Those who are in the know about the Australian LPG industry would know what I'm on about...

Unlikely at this late stage. Unless that stupid patent issue has come back again.

Swordsman88 · 30-03-2011, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PoweredByCNG

I have heard rumours of another major problem that may delay Ford's EcoLPI engine indefinitely. Those who are in the know about the Australian LPG industry would know what I'm on about...

Based on what wotdah just said the new ecolpi is coming down the line already (for final testing production spec i assume) so its not a technical reason. Unless its to do with that start up issue legally speaking as discussed earlier than i can't see much left to get in the way.... But as you say maybe the guys on here more into the lpg industry will know more....