Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > Non Ford Related Community Forums > The Bar

The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-02-2012, 01:24 PM   #1
AC
Saving for a Jet Car
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: richmond.nsw.au
Posts: 3,745
Default Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

What a load of BS... *I shake my head*

I dont see how either having or not having a tattoo makes you a good or bad person.

Vote now! - in link

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/new...-1226274718106

Quote:
THE backlash against tattoos has spread to restaurants and pubs, which are banning patrons with visible ink.

From Rouse Hill in Sydney's northwest to wealthy Double Bay in the east, signs are being erected warning patrons they will not be allowed in unless they cover up.The "no tattoo" policies followed NSW Police looking to ban tattoos from the force.

While some pubs and restaurants have formal bans on tattoos, many others have informal policies.

Andrew Stanway, owner of dining spot and watering hole Mrs Sippy in Double Bay, made no apologies for the sign on his door: "All body art is to be covered and not visible to the naked eye."

Mr Stanway said the policy was to keep out "riff-raff".

"With some tattoos, people can be of a lesser persuasion, if you like," Mr Stanway said.

"We don't want the riff-raff, we don't want the crap. I've watched too many places get ruined because of that. I've worked too hard for that."

Mr Stanway said he had no problem with small, discreet tattoos and did not mind if his policy discouraged young people from dining there.

"If you want to come in, you've got to be respectful to my business by being respectfully dressed," he said.

A sign at the Australian Hotel and Brewery in Rouse Hill reads: "NO Visable (sic) Tattoo's (sic)."

The two-year-old pub only enforces the policy on Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights and also bans "gangs or gang clothing".

Matt Morris, a 26-year-old spray painter from Windsor, was rejected at Christmas over his three-quarter "sleeve" of tattoos on his left arm.

"They wouldn't let me in the door. But then we came here for my friend's party (on another occasion) and I put a long-sleeved shirt on and there were staff and other people here with tattoos. I asked the bloke (on the door) about the tattoo policy and they said it just depends on if they don't like the look of you. So I just rolled up my sleeves," he said.

General manager Marcello Colosimo said the tattoo ban applied to the hotel's staff as well as patrons.

"We have a dress policy that comes into effect after 9pm on Thursday, Friday, Saturday nights which includes: no hats, no thongs, no shorts, no offensive or highly visible tattoos, no singlets. This applies to staff as well," he said. "At all other times, these are all welcome."

Coogee Bay Hotel last year had a sign on the doors saying: "Entry is not permitted to anyone when wearing visible tattoos." But the sign has since been removed and when contacted by The Sunday Telegraph, a spokeswoman denied there was a no-tattoo policy.

Australian Hotels Association chief executive Paul Nicolaou said licensees were within their rights to deny entry to anyone as long as they do not breach anti-discrimination laws.
__________________
RIDES
2011 SZ Territory Titanium TDCi - Smoke
2001 Mitsubishi "BONSAI" GSR Mirage - see thread
AC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 01:38 PM   #2
nstg8a
3..2..1..
 
nstg8a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bellbird park
Posts: 7,218
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

lol, id have to wear a glove ala jacko to eat there...

really i dont care, its their business, they can serve who they want.

whilest i believe there shouldnt be 'discrimination' against people with tattoos, when you get a tattoo, especially a visible one, you would have to be a moron to expect no issues to ever arise because of it. right or wrong, some people perceive tattoos as associated with the undesirable elements of society.

so my original point stands, their business, their rules.
nstg8a is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 01:44 PM   #3
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Get your revenge by not eating there, or better still open your own restruant that bans people without tattoos.

This discrimination is just so terrible, it is just like people being prejudged by what badges they have on their car like:

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
Added 50kWs, just like the Chev badge on the front
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 01:49 PM   #4
FG_Frodza
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FG_Frodza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 734
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Voted yes.
__________________
2011 Ford FG Falcon XR6 LE - Winter White
Mods (so far):
Sunroof, new speakers, twin 12" subs
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?p=4150126
FG_Frodza is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 01:58 PM   #5
gtxb67
moderator ford coupe club
 
gtxb67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,640
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

i can see why the owner has thought this way

however
a tattoo does not make you a good or bad person - in the 21st century (even late 20th century), full arm tatts are almost trendy and certainly not just for the riff raff as many perceive tattooed people to be


the other point that he may have forgotten, is the person he is trying to keep out is likely to just knock his bouncer out or come back after hours and do something then. a tattooed person is not a boof head - a boof head may be tattooed and this rule will maybe just anger the boof head enough to do something about it




Quote:
Originally Posted by nstg8a
lol, id have to wear a glove ala jacko to eat there...

really i dont care, its their business, they can serve who they want.

whilest i believe there shouldnt be 'discrimination' against people with tattoos, when you get a tattoo, especially a visible one, you would have to be a moron to expect no issues to ever arise because of it. right or wrong, some people perceive tattoos as associated with the undesirable elements of society.

so my original point stands, their business, their rules.
i like this reply - no crying "poor lil ol me". i don't have tatts, but if someone did not want to serve me for anything, i would just walk away too
gtxb67 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 02:04 PM   #6
HVAC PRO
Regular Member
 
HVAC PRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 64
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

HVAC PRO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 02:10 PM   #7
kawalsky19
Kawalsky
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 149
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

The brewery in Rouse Hill only seems to enforce that rule for male patrons and i have seen it being enforced selectively ie a group of guys walk in covered in tattoo's, next group walks up to the door and gets rejected due to having a couple of small visible tattoo's. if they are going to enforce a rule like this it should cover everyone not just those who they chose.
__________________
Daily: 2006 BF XR6 Magnet Ute
Toy: 1978 XC Fairmont Sedan 4.1L
Project: 1974 Windowless Panel van http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11331735
kawalsky19 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 02:11 PM   #8
pottery beige
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 18,987
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Quote:
Originally Posted by FG_Frodza
Voted yes.
you would...
pottery beige is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 02:13 PM   #9
Jim Goose
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

I woulda thought that most restaurants/ hotels already have a "dress code"...
cant see an issue with visible tatts... so lord knows why they see it as a problem?

I can understand rudeness (ie talking on phone while being served etc)... but this is really bizzare.

A drunken yobbo with long sleeves is still going to act the same way if he decides to get agro.
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions??

Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole....
Jim Goose is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 02:14 PM   #10
pottery beige
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 18,987
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

personally since having tattoos.. im much tougher.. ive had the sudden urge to hold up a bank.. bash old people and slap crying children...
pottery beige is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 02:16 PM   #11
nstg8a
3..2..1..
 
nstg8a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bellbird park
Posts: 7,218
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Quote:
Originally Posted by kawalsky19
The brewery in Rouse Hill only seems to enforce that rule for male patrons and i have seen it being enforced selectively ie a group of guys walk in covered in tattoo's, next group walks up to the door and gets rejected due to having a couple of small visible tattoo's. if they are going to enforce a rule like this it should cover everyone not just those who they chose.
thats life though, its no different to the bouncer that tells you the nightclub is too full so you have to wait, but then turns and lets in a bunch of good looking girls.

i think in society we care too much about trivial issues, and not enough about the serious stuff.
nstg8a is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 02:23 PM   #12
Neale
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Neale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,481
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Quote:
Originally Posted by nstg8a
thats life though, its no different to the bouncer that tells you the nightclub is too full so you have to wait, but then turns and lets in a bunch of good looking girls.

i think in society we care too much about trivial issues, and not enough about the serious stuff.

^^^^^^
totally agree,
Neale is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 02:47 PM   #13
FGII-XR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FGII-XR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salamander Bay
Posts: 5,427
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

I see the point, not everyone with a tattoo is a bogan or tough nut but these type of people are virtually all tattooed. I don't see the policy working well as more good people would be excluded than morons.

I really don't care if others have tattoos (I don't as I see it as nothing more than a self inflicted scar but to each their own) but seriously, some people don't think before the act. Anyone wanting their face done should have a mandatory psych assessment given the permanent nature of a tattoo.

The owner of any establishment is entitled to enforce standards providing they don't breach the anti discrimination act, if you don't like it cover up or go elsewhere
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Everyone starts off with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the experience bag before the luck bag is empty.

"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt."

Start a new career as a bus driver

Rides:
FG2 XR6 stock at this stage but a very nice ride

xc 4 DOOR X CHASER 5.8 UNDER RESTO
FGII-XR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 03:18 PM   #14
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,441
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Isn't that descrimination?

It would be a different story and everyone would be up in arms if they said they didn't allow gays into their business because of X reason.
Franco Cozzo is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 03:26 PM   #15
glavas
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane cannon hill
Posts: 310
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Damo
Isn't that descrimination?

It would be a different story and everyone would be up in arms if they said they didn't allow gays into their business because of X reason.
everyone? thats rather broad is it not?
glavas is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 03:31 PM   #16
nstg8a
3..2..1..
 
nstg8a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bellbird park
Posts: 7,218
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Something are legal to discriminate against. some aren't.

personally if someone doesn't want the business of certain people that should be their choice imo
nstg8a is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 03:39 PM   #17
FGII-XR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FGII-XR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salamander Bay
Posts: 5,427
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

No, the anti discrimination act only covers race, religion, marital status, sexuality & disability anything else is up to the individual to decide
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Damo
Isn't that descrimination?

It would be a different story and everyone would be up in arms if they said they didn't allow gays into their business because of X reason.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Everyone starts off with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the experience bag before the luck bag is empty.

"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt."

Start a new career as a bus driver

Rides:
FG2 XR6 stock at this stage but a very nice ride

xc 4 DOOR X CHASER 5.8 UNDER RESTO
FGII-XR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 03:40 PM   #18
SSD-85
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,142
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

This thread just reminds me of a certain quote from Futurama...
SSD-85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 04:00 PM   #19
z80
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 598
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

It's a bit over the top to ban all tattoos.

But they run the businesses, after a while they work out the statistics of where the problems start from.

If they have a run of problems with tattoo'ed people then they can fix the problem anyway they like.


It could be as simple as looking at video security events and if all the problems involve patrons with tattoos or baseball hats they ban baseball hatted tattoo'ed Collingwood supporters.
z80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 04:07 PM   #20
Iggypoppin'
Chasing a FORD project!
 
Iggypoppin''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: adelaide
Posts: 5,114
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Cover. I am judging this book by it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by HSE2
Today we might get beaten at some of our own game. Tomorrow we reinvent it.
Game. Reinvented.

1996 BMW 740iL V8. TV, phone, leather, sunroof, satnav, all as standard. Now with 19" TSW Brooklands, 2 1/2" stainless steel exhaust, plus more coming soon.
Iggypoppin' is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 04:38 PM   #21
My poor XF
Geelong FC 07, 09 & 2011
 
My poor XF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne Vic
Posts: 1,552
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Quote:
Originally Posted by pottery beige
personally since having tattoos.. im much tougher.. ive had the sudden urge to slap crying children...
I don't have tats and I get that urge all the time.

Don't care if you have tats, people are knobs without them so......
__________________
2023 Audi A5 45 TFSI
My poor XF is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 05:16 PM   #22
DJR-351
I am Groot
Donating Member3
 
DJR-351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Burnett Heads, Qld
Posts: 6,840
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

I gotta laugh at the 1 Comment left tho....

Quote:
Matt D of Australiana Posted at 1:19 AM Today
Years ago I would have agreed. You used to have to be tough to have tatts. Now nerds and girly men get them to match their mascara. Let the little princesses in to have their Crownies or whatever "special boutique" cocktail they prance around with these days. Tatts? hell I think I even saw a Nun with one.
__________________
..
McLaren F1
Dick Johnson Racing

"Those were the days when the cars were cars, they weren't built out of an Ikea pack like they are now and clothed in plastic; they were real cars." John Bowe
DJR-351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 05:44 PM   #23
ratter
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ratter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pit Lane
Posts: 11,867
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Shares his in-depth tuning knowledge with the forum, very helpful. Contributor: For members who make a contribution worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For his indepth tutorial on adding borders to photographs 
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Nothing really new happening here, I worked security back in the mid 90's, at 1 venue, I was not allow entry to anybody with visible tatts.
__________________
Pit Lane Performance
20 Rosella St Frankston 03 9783 8122

Authorised Streetfighter, Pcmtec , SCT & HP Tuners Tuning Agent,
ratter is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 06:19 PM   #24
ego gtp
Club Moderator
Donating Member3
 
ego gtp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 547
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Well there a quite a few morons around. How about people with or without glasses, beards ,shaved heads ,or Even bloody older people, what a load of bull. So let me see if I have this right . Here goes. You walk in to this establishment and you are gay either male or female, you have visible tattoos and your refused entry because of it you could complain you were discriminated against but if you are not gay ,you couldn't use that . Before people get on their soap box think about it it would happen . Yes I am a very tattooed male ,would not go to this place with their policies. The whole worlds gone mad...................
ego gtp is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 06:25 PM   #25
FGII-XR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FGII-XR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salamander Bay
Posts: 5,427
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Quote:
Originally Posted by ego gtp
Well there a quite a few morons around. How about people with or without glasses, beards ,shaved heads ,or Even bloody older people, what a load of bull. So let me see if I have this right . Here goes. You walk in to this establishment and you are gay either male or female, you have visible tattoos and your refused entry because of it you could complain you were discriminated against but if you are not gay ,you couldn't use that . Before people get on their soap box think about it it would happen . Yes I am a very tattooed male ,would not go to this place with their policies. The whole worlds gone mad...................
if they clearly state they can't get in becauce of tattoos and there is a policy in place about tattoos nobody would have legal grounds to sue if they had visible tattoos
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Everyone starts off with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the experience bag before the luck bag is empty.

"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt."

Start a new career as a bus driver

Rides:
FG2 XR6 stock at this stage but a very nice ride

xc 4 DOOR X CHASER 5.8 UNDER RESTO
FGII-XR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 06:37 PM   #26
Yellow_Festiva
Where to next??
 
Yellow_Festiva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8,893
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratter
Nothing really new happening here, I worked security back in the mid 90's, at 1 venue, I was not allow entry to anybody with visible tatts.
Fine line isn't it..... A friend who used to manage a club in the Cross had similar stories. Ban and you were up for trouble, let em in and you were up for trouble.

In Russia, they are more direct... they didn't like the look of you they told you direct. Heard them being referred to as the "Face Police"...

Much the same in a lot of other places... "Rights of admission" signs hang all over African hotels / restaurants / bars / clubs.

Shame they are targeting tattoos.... Most of my brothers tradie mates have tats galore and they are the nicest motley crew you can meet, besides their outward appearance!
Yellow_Festiva is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 06:53 PM   #27
Rodp
Regular Schmuck
 
Rodp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,640
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Good evening.. I had a reservation for two..?



Does it include tramp stamps?
Rodp is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 07:05 PM   #28
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

There would seem to be just as many people with Tattoos than without, infact, in the more 'hip' regional areas (Chapel St springs to mind, seems to be an essential beautiful people accessory), the Tatt-less person is probably in the minority..

If that business at the heart of this story wants to reduce their potential market by such a large percentage, by applying the policy across the board, that's their perogative I suppose.

It won't be applied across the board. The gorgeous model chick in a black dress that turns up with a tattoo on her upper arm, or ankle, something discreet, won't be told to bugger off.

The dirty looking bloke with HATE and LOVE on his fingers, a spider web on his neck a tear drop under his left eye with full 'painted sleeves' visible for all to see - probably will be asked to keep walking.

The dirty looking bloke covered in jail house tough badges, whats his take??? He'd probably be a bit ****ed I reckon.

Have I got a problem with that? Nah not really, couldn't give a crap, but only for purely selfish reasons.... I like to look at hot model chicks with a little tatt while I eat and drink, and not so much dirty looking rough heads covered in jail house ink



That's life and to be frank, it aint news worthy in my opinion.

Nor is dress code policy, or minimum age requirements, or height, etc etc etc.
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.

Last edited by tex; 19-02-2012 at 07:12 PM.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 07:11 PM   #29
AC
Saving for a Jet Car
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: richmond.nsw.au
Posts: 3,745
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

One thing also sprang to mind while I've been away from this this afternoon.

Sure they can enforce their own criteria for entry, But bare in mind that people who have spent the money on it, generally have more money to burn. So being a free country and all, feel free to turn away the business of the 99.9% of people who are good people and the money they are willing to spend at your business. Your loss, I know where I prefer to spend mine.
__________________
RIDES
2011 SZ Territory Titanium TDCi - Smoke
2001 Mitsubishi "BONSAI" GSR Mirage - see thread
AC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2012, 07:46 PM   #30
svo supporter
Fixing Ford's **** ups
 
svo supporter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 4,759
Default Re: Hoteliers move to ban tattoo'd patrons

Personally I couldn't give a rats if someone had tatts or not. They want to spend their hard earned in a place I owned, go for it.

If someone is going to start trouble in a restaurant, or alikes, they'll get the boot, tats or not.
__________________
A wheel alignment fixes everything, when it comes to front end issues. This includes any little noises.



Please read the manual carefully, as the these manufacturers spent millions of dollars making sure it is perfect.....Now why are there so many problems with my car, when I follow the instructions to the letter?....Answer, majority rules round here


Lock me up and throw away the key because I'm a hoon....I got caught doing 59 in a 60 zone

Last edited by DJM83; 20-02-2012 at 10:20 AM. Reason: removed unconstructive portion of post
svo supporter is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 02:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL