Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > Non Ford Related Community Forums > The Bar

The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2011, 09:27 PM   #1
Cooper69S
Regular Member
 
Cooper69S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bunbury WA
Posts: 464
Default WA govt improves stupid mobile phone laws

Just heard on the news.... from 1st March the laws regarding using a mobile phone while driving will be improved a bit. Until now it's been kind of nonsensical. It's perfectly ok to press a button on the steering wheel, or external bluetooth device to answer the phone, but not the button on the phone. Well now it will be fine to answer or dial a call on a phone as long as it's in a cradle or connected to a handsfree device.

Cooper69S is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-02-2011, 09:28 PM   #2
SpoolMan
Solution Was Boost 4?, 6 & 8
 
SpoolMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 23,624
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: The exceptional contribution made to AFF events and sponsorship. Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Everything you do to help this place run smoothly! Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: The awesome Technical and Service how to's in the FPV /XR6 /G6ET turbo threads..  and his own build threads that inspire people to have a go... enabling people to save money and realise the dream of working on their own cars as well. 
Default

Vic has the same silly laws..
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

AUTOTECH TUNED EDELEBROCK CHARGED
2017 GT Mustang Plenty of RWKW
SpoolMan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-02-2011, 09:46 PM   #3
HLC
Audi S3
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney.
Posts: 8,307
Default

All of WA is stupid. I got a fine for driving through an Amber light the other day. I thought if it was unsafe to stop/having to slam on the anchors i thought you were ok.

Well it was when i did my test in Sydney.
__________________
HLC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-02-2011, 10:10 PM   #4
Elks
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
Elks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpoolMan
Vic has the same silly laws..
We have lots of silly laws..
__________________
Oooh baby living in Miami....
Elks is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-02-2011, 11:01 PM   #5
bungarra
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HLC
All of WA is stupid. I got a fine for driving through an Amber light the other day. I thought if it was unsafe to stop/having to slam on the anchors i thought you were ok.

Well it was when i did my test in Sydney.
Unfortunately you can only go through if your car is fully in the zone where the solid white line is dividing the two lanes, according to the national road code. If you were in there you could argue it in court, but wont work if you have done advance driving courses, they teach you to ease of the accelorator as you get within 25 metres of lights.
bungarra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-02-2011, 11:09 PM   #6
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HLC
All of WA is stupid. I got a fine for driving through an Amber light the other day. I thought if it was unsafe to stop/having to slam on the anchors i thought you were ok.

Well it was when i did my test in Sydney.
I would contest that one Henri, if it was unsafe to stop then you are perfectly within your rights to proceed.

I got pulled up once in Perth for driving in a "hire car & taxi" lane.
The copper swore black and blue my car was a "rental" car and a hire car was a limo until I showed him the "car hire agreement" which described the "hire car".
He wandered off shaking his head.
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 12:45 AM   #7
sudszy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooper69S
Just heard on the news.... from 1st March the laws regarding using a mobile phone while driving will be improved a bit. Until now it's been kind of nonsensical. It's perfectly ok to press a button on the steering wheel, or external bluetooth device to answer the phone, but not the button on the phone. Well now it will be fine to answer or dial a call on a phone as long as it's in a cradle or connected to a handsfree device.
sounds like wa is not acting on the best advice out there. The danger is not the physical act of holding the phone in hand or pushing a button, its the distraction of maintaining a conversation with a person that is not in the vehicle, proven to be equivalent to being 0.1 bac.
sudszy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 07:23 AM   #8
3vXT
...
 
3vXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,046
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sudszy
sounds like wa is not acting on the best advice out there. The danger is not the physical act of holding the phone in hand or pushing a button, its the distraction of maintaining a conversation with a person that is not in the vehicle, proven to be equivalent to being 0.1 bac.
Don't say that here

I agree with you btw, but i'm not getting involved this time.
3vXT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 07:55 AM   #9
Yellow_Festiva
Where to next??
 
Yellow_Festiva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8,893
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sudszy
sounds like wa is not acting on the best advice out there. The danger is not the physical act of holding the phone in hand or pushing a button, its the distraction of maintaining a conversation with a person that is not in the vehicle, proven to be equivalent to being 0.1 bac.


Having a person in the car and talking to them is legal, as is having a BAC of .01 if you are an experienced driver on a full licence.
Yellow_Festiva is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 08:17 AM   #10
Cam
Stroking it...
 
Cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The 'butt
Posts: 2,844
Default

Then there are laws on using CB radios.. Or I can touch a GPS device in a car, but cant touch my phone to use GPS.. Someone needs to develop a GPS device with a SIM...
__________________
Had: 347ci AU
Then: Stock AU fairmont wagon...'05 AWD Terri GHIA on Gas.. and a caravan..
Currently traveling OZ Travels over, follow me at http://Facebook.com/gonecaravaning
Now: Busted assed EB Wagon - 5sp and Dual Fuel.
Cam is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 08:30 AM   #11
burnz
VFII SS UTE
 
burnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 6,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam
Then there are laws on using CB radios.. Or I can touch a GPS device in a car, but cant touch my phone to use GPS.. Someone needs to develop a GPS device with a SIM...
it's cheaper and more logical to vote the goverment out..
__________________
I don't often hear the sound of a screaming LSX.
But when I do, So do the neighbours..
GO SOUTHS
burnz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 09:04 AM   #12
charles_wif_xf
Purveyor of filth
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sudszy
sounds like wa is not acting on the best advice out there. The danger is not the physical act of holding the phone in hand or pushing a button, its the distraction of maintaining a conversation with a person that is not in the vehicle, proven to be equivalent to being 0.1 bac.
Awesome first post sudszy, pity govco doesn't use the same logic and common sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by burnz
it's cheaper and more logical to vote the goverment out..
What, vote for the other side of the same coin... nothing will change until people wake up to the fact that two party politics is really one party politics. But discussing politics on this forum is taboo so I best leave it at that.
charles_wif_xf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 09:06 AM   #13
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam
Then there are laws on using CB radios.. Or I can touch a GPS device in a car, but cant touch my phone to use GPS.. Someone needs to develop a GPS device with a SIM...
GPS with a sim?

Why not make it a multi-function GPS/music box/face space terminal/playstation with a sim?

You could call it gmbfstpPHONE............

I suspect the major reason why CB is restricted like mobile phones is that most CB conversations are short and too the point and it is extremely uncommon to hear "well she said and then I said and then she said and oh! isn't that pretty then have you seen the new nail polish at "trendys" I am trying it on now then what colour......" with a background of car horns and muffles abusive language......
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 10:00 AM   #14
LowEL2XR8
Mr Impulsive
 
LowEL2XR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Perth NOR.
Posts: 1,309
Default

My cradle is an elastic band wrapped around my sun visor.
__________________
Owned Fords
85 Telstar (man), 96 EF GLi (auto), 95 EF XR6 (man), 97 EL Fairmont Ghia (auto), 98 EL XR8 (man), 06 BF wagon (auto), 06 BF XR6 (ZF auto), 08 FG G6E (ZF auto), '10 SY MKII TS Territory (4spd)
LowEL2XR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 10:13 AM   #15
bungarra
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 488
Default

They are only taking the ambiquity out of the law. The argument has always been about the fact that you can use GPS Devices, CB's etc but couldn't talk on a mobile. It has also been proven that it is more dangerous to talk to a person in a car as you are more likely to look away from the road. So you could ban people talking in cars, the ****** reading a road map while weaving all over throad, even listening to the radio had proven to be the equivelent of 0.01. So lets just ban driving, make it safer.

I liked NSW coppers years ago, pay the "fine" on the side of road, never got demerit points though. Wonder why?
bungarra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 11:21 AM   #16
sudszy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow_Festiva


Having a person in the car and talking to them is legal, as is having a BAC of .01 if you are an experienced driver on a full licence.
Yes you are correct, but what is your point?

Talking to a passenger in the car is not the same for a driver as talking to someone not in the vehicle:

http://www.dtei.sa.gov.au/roadsafety...bile_phone_use, please look up the research.

The research also tells us the likelihood of an accident increases fourfold when using a mobile, which puts it equivalent to driving at ~0.1bac, not 0.01 bac.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bungarra
It has also been proven that it is more dangerous to talk to a person in a car as you are more likely to look away from the road. ?
Certainly talking to passengers is recognised as a distraction, but the evidence shows that it pales into insignificance with the risk of conducting a conversation with someone who is not in the vehicle
sudszy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 12:34 PM   #17
Halfmo Rocks
Bearded Hermit
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: blue mountains, NSW
Posts: 449
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LowEL2XR8
My cradle is an elastic band wrapped around my sun visor.
me too...makes so much sense, but so few people want to use such a low tech solution for some reason
__________________
BA XR6, Mercury silver, leather, premium sound, 4 very boring speeds

previously...AUII Futura, BAII XR6T ute, BFII XT, BF XR6...with a holden barina & a renault clio thown in at times of financial crisis
Halfmo Rocks is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 01:24 PM   #18
Fled74
The Thread Killa
 
Fled74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LowEL2XR8
My cradle is an elastic band wrapped around my sun visor.
Ghetto mods FTW.
I also have zip ties, gaffa tape and Blu-Tac in my glove box for those impromptu repair jobs.
__________________



"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
Fled74 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 01:32 PM   #19
Streets
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: QLD
Posts: 685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LowEL2XR8
My cradle is an elastic band wrapped around my sun visor.
That's genius. I wish I hadn't accidentally snapped my sun visor off :(
Streets is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 02:00 PM   #20
JC
Miami Pilot
Donating Member2
 
JC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 21,703
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam
Then there are laws on using CB radios.. Or I can touch a GPS device in a car, but cant touch my phone to use GPS.. Someone needs to develop a GPS device with a SIM...
I have GPS on my phone, does that count as GPS with a SIM?

you're not supposed to touch the GPS while driving though.......
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hammer: FG GTE | 376rwkw | 1/4 mile 11.793 @ 119.75mph 1.733 60' (4408lb)
1 of 60 FG MK1 335 GTEs (1 of 118 FG Mk 1 & 2 335 GTEs).
Mods: Tune, HSD/ShockWorks, black GT335 19” staggered replicas with 245 & 275/35/19 Michelin Pilot sport 5s

Daily: BF2 Fairmont Ghia I6 ZF, machine face GT335 19” staggered Replicas with 245s and 275s, Bilsteins & Kings

FPV 335 build stats: <click here>

Ford Performance Club ACT
JC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 03:26 PM   #21
Halfmo Rocks
Bearded Hermit
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: blue mountains, NSW
Posts: 449
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fled74
Ghetto mods FTW.
I also have zip ties, gaffa tape and Blu-Tac in my glove box for those impromptu repair jobs.
me too, gotta love improvisation.

there i fixed it.com is a source of constant inspiration
__________________
BA XR6, Mercury silver, leather, premium sound, 4 very boring speeds

previously...AUII Futura, BAII XR6T ute, BFII XT, BF XR6...with a holden barina & a renault clio thown in at times of financial crisis
Halfmo Rocks is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 08:00 PM   #22
Riksta
Captain Malcolm Reynolds
 
Riksta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist
I got pulled up once in Perth for driving in a "hire car & taxi" lane.
The copper swore black and blue my car was a "rental" car and a hire car was a limo until I showed him the "car hire agreement" which described the "hire car".
He wandered off shaking his head.
I don't get it, what's the difference between a "rental car" and a "hire car"? One and the same aren't they, just different wording?
__________________
Currently: 2014 Mazda6 GT (Daily) and 1999 Mazda MX5 (Fun Car)
Previously: 2001 Ford Escape XLT; 2010 MC Mondeo; 1984 FD LTD; 2001 AU2 Falcon Forte; 2005 LS Focus Zetec; 1988 RE Colt; 1982 RB Colt; 1974 KE20 Corolla
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
Riksta likes VN's so much, he has the ashes of a VN in a jar on the mantle piece, a vile of VN engine oil hanging from his neck and a BT1 build plate locked up in a safe, buried under 6ft of concrete.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Day-mow
pretty much what has happened here is i trolled you. and it was fun.
Riksta is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 08:57 PM   #23
HLC
Audi S3
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney.
Posts: 8,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist
I would contest that one Henri, if it was unsafe to stop then you are perfectly within your rights to proceed.

I got pulled up once in Perth for driving in a "hire car & taxi" lane.
The copper swore black and blue my car was a "rental" car and a hire car was a limo until I showed him the "car hire agreement" which described the "hire car".
He wandered off shaking his head.
Not worth the time off work or the hassle. The copper said it was red and I had to argue amber. Besides apparently the points don't hit your license until you get a WA one. Mine is still NSW so who knows.
__________________
HLC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 10:25 PM   #24
Cooper69S
Regular Member
 
Cooper69S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bunbury WA
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sudszy
sounds like wa is not acting on the best advice out there. The danger is not the physical act of holding the phone in hand or pushing a button, its the distraction of maintaining a conversation with a person that is not in the vehicle, proven to be equivalent to being 0.1 bac.
well for starters it's not just WA, pretty sure no Aussie state has outlawed handsfree mobile conversations in cars.
It's just that we had this crazy inconsistency with being allowed to answer a call and talk handsfree, but only if the button you push to answer the call is not physically attached to the phone.
And in any case I'm ok with the law change - suits me - long highway drives are a good opportunity to catch up with people on the phone. There are plenty of other things that distract drivers and increase the risk of a crash and most of them would be impossible to police. can't just "ban everything".
Cooper69S is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 11:11 PM   #25
Cam
Stroking it...
 
Cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The 'butt
Posts: 2,844
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist
GPS with a sim?

Why not make it a multi-function GPS/music box/face space terminal/playstation with a sim?

You could call it gmbfstpPHONE............
Heh, surely that could be marketed..

But seriously, GPS devices have a good speaker, add a good mic and a slot where u can easily insert your sim, and give it the functionality to auto answer etc. Cant see why it wouldn't work...

Quote:
Originally Posted by JC
I have GPS on my phone, does that count as GPS with a SIM?

you're not supposed to touch the GPS while driving though.......
So do I, but my understanding was that as its primary use is a phone you cannot use it? Could very well be wrong..

Anyone know if it's actually illegal to use a GPS when your driving? I'm not sure?
__________________
Had: 347ci AU
Then: Stock AU fairmont wagon...'05 AWD Terri GHIA on Gas.. and a caravan..
Currently traveling OZ Travels over, follow me at http://Facebook.com/gonecaravaning
Now: Busted assed EB Wagon - 5sp and Dual Fuel.
Cam is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 11:27 PM   #26
bungarra
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sudszy
Certainly talking to passengers is recognised as a distraction, but the evidence shows that it pales into insignificance with the risk of conducting a conversation with someone who is not in the vehicle
Tell that to my mate who had his car slammed into by a guy in his new GS who was to busy talking to the passenger. He might have a different opinion.
bungarra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-02-2011, 11:39 PM   #27
Cooper69S
Regular Member
 
Cooper69S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bunbury WA
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bungarra
Tell that to my mate who had his car slammed into by a guy in his new GS who was to busy talking to the passenger. He might have a different opinion.
I've been passenger in cars where the driver had that strange habit of continuously turning to face the passenger as he spoke to them ... sure it's polite to look people in the eye when you speak to them, but I'm quite happy for drivers of cars I'm in to be impolite in that case... at least drivers on the phone are probably still looking at the road
Cooper69S is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-02-2011, 07:26 AM   #28
sudszy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooper69S
well for starters it's not just WA, pretty sure no Aussie state has outlawed handsfree mobile conversations in cars.
It's just that we had this crazy inconsistency with being allowed to answer a call and talk handsfree, but only if the button you push to answer the call is not physically attached to the phone.
Consistency at the expense of adopting the lowest common denominator in safety?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooper69S
And in any case I'm ok with the law change - suits me - long highway drives are a good opportunity to catch up with people on the phone. There are plenty of other things that distract drivers and increase the risk of a crash and most of them would be impossible to police. can't just "ban everything
So on that logic drunk driving is okay too, the risk of incident is the same. Surely you are not suggesting that we should only have laws against activities that are easy to police?
sudszy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-02-2011, 10:34 AM   #29
bungarra
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sudszy
Consistency at the expense of adopting the lowest common denominator in safety?
WA is just adopting what was raised by the NSW Police Minister and recommended as part of the National Road Safety and Police Ministers meeting. So the majority is now the lowest common demoninator?




Quote:
Originally Posted by sudszy
So on that logic drunk driving is okay too, the risk of incident is the same. Surely you are not suggesting that we should only have laws against activities that are easy to police?
No one has suggested that drunk driving is ok in any of the posts.
bungarra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-02-2011, 02:37 PM   #30
Keepleft
Mot Adv-NSW
 
Keepleft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lake Macquarie, NSW
Posts: 2,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam
Anyone know if it's actually illegal to use a GPS when your driving? I'm not sure?
It certainly is NOT.

PROVIDED your GPS is secured with a commercially built device. Ie; the windscreen cup holder thingy supplied as standard with the device.

See ARR.
Texting et al remains verboten.
__________________
ORDER FORD AUSTRALIA PART NO: AM6U7J19G329AA. This is a European-UN/AS3790B Spec safety-warning triangle used to give advanced warning to approaching traffic of a vehicle breakdown, or crash scene (to prevent secondary). Stow in the boot area. See your Ford dealer for this $35.95 safety item & when you buy a new Ford, please insist on it! See Page 83, part 4.4.1 http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/media...eSafePart4.pdf
Keepleft is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL