Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > OzECruisers (E/N/D Series) > OzECruisers General Discussions

OzECruisers General Discussions E/N/D vehicles General Discussion ONLY. NO TECH THREADS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14-03-2007, 12:34 PM   #1
Brent79
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 185
Default 3.9L Finally Dead

Well after 515,000Kms my 3.9L has decided to pack it in. It seems after replacing the head gasket that my block did indeed have a crack in the #5 cylinder. Damn! Im kinda surprised that the block cracked first considering it didnt overheat and the bearings and rings are original items!

So, after long consideration ive decided to keep the old wagon and give it
an exchange engine! What kinda engine should i get? 3.9? (cheap) 4L (good with no mods) or an AU (mods?) Ive also got a ED tickford head on the stuffed motor, would it be worthwile taking the head over to the new block?
What kinda $$$ do mechs charge to replace engines?? cheers

Brent

__________________
EB1 Falcon Wagon
3.9L Multipoint with 5 speed manual
Pacemaker extractors & 2.5" Redback exhaust
Tickford Head and Wade 1004 cam
HP4 Chiptorque chip and XH intake

1992 DC LTD
5LTR DUEL FUEL
Brent79 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 12:42 PM   #2
Professor Farnsworth
Fossil fuel consumer
 
Professor Farnsworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mod For: Pub, Bar, Sales Yard, Show 'N Shine, Photoshop, AU to BF, FG to FGX, Territory & Sports Bar
Posts: 17,046
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Many years of valuable contributions to the forum, including some superb build threads. 
Default

if you're up for a few mods, go an AU motor, but in all honesty mate, i'd just buy a whole new car. You could get a decent EA Ghia sedan or wagon for the same price if not less than it would cost to reco your current car.

or you could buy my EB Ghia V8 :P
__________________
2024 RS 3 sedan - Mythos Black
2023 Superb Sportline sedan - Steel Grey
2025 Mustang GT - Vapour Blue
Professor Farnsworth is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 12:48 PM   #3
needaXYGT
AU II XR8
 
needaXYGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: melbourne
Posts: 978
Default

if you want to keep the wagon for some kind of sentimental value, then slap an AU engine in it!
__________________
AU XR8 II ute
XD FAIRMONT GHIA 302
XA FAIRMONT 302 TOPLOADER
needaXYGT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 12:50 PM   #4
Brent79
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 185
Default

yea but this one is a manual, perfect paint, EL interior and a **** load of blood, sweat and tears! If it didnt mean anything to me, i wouldnt keep it as ive got another car.
Was just real fun to cruise around in!

Brent
__________________
EB1 Falcon Wagon
3.9L Multipoint with 5 speed manual
Pacemaker extractors & 2.5" Redback exhaust
Tickford Head and Wade 1004 cam
HP4 Chiptorque chip and XH intake

1992 DC LTD
5LTR DUEL FUEL
Brent79 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 12:53 PM   #5
Brent79
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 185
Default

needaXYGT, doesnt an AU engine need a special sump tho?? can i just buy a new EA-EL sump and put it on???

Brent
__________________
EB1 Falcon Wagon
3.9L Multipoint with 5 speed manual
Pacemaker extractors & 2.5" Redback exhaust
Tickford Head and Wade 1004 cam
HP4 Chiptorque chip and XH intake

1992 DC LTD
5LTR DUEL FUEL
Brent79 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 01:03 PM   #6
EDXR6T
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent79
needaXYGT, doesnt an AU engine need a special sump tho?? can i just buy a new EA-EL sump and put it on???

Brent
There is a dedicated AU engine conversion thread in the technical section.

Its easy as **** if you use the orignal Accessories setup.

$550 for an AU engine, $200 for thermo fan's then i donno i guess a decent shop will charge about $600-$700 for the change over? Mabey a bit more.

Do it your self its an easy job.
EDXR6T is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 01:07 PM   #7
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EDXR6T
There is a dedicated AU engine conversion thread in the technical section.

Its easy as **** if you use the orignal Accessories setup.

$550 for an AU engine, $200 for thermo fan's then i donno i guess a decent shop will charge about $600-$700 for the change over? Mabey a bit more.

Do it your self its an easy job.
I agree, if my motor ever dies (or should I say when), its AU time.

Although its only easy if you have the right tools.
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 01:11 PM   #8
atec77
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent79
Well after 515,000Kms my 3.9L has decided to pack it in. It seems after replacing the head gasket that my block did indeed have a crack in the #5 cylinder. Damn! Im kinda surprised that the block cracked first considering it didnt overheat and the bearings and rings are original items!

So, after long consideration ive decided to keep the old wagon and give it
an exchange engine! What kinda engine should i get? 3.9? (cheap) 4L (good with no mods) or an AU (mods?) Ive also got a ED tickford head on the stuffed motor, would it be worthwile taking the head over to the new block?
What kinda $$$ do mechs charge to replace engines?? cheers

Brent
so 800 or so for a motor and box out a later model car and a day or two to swap it doing the work your self , seems reasonable
atec77 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 01:17 PM   #9
EA2BA
PM me if you want
 
EA2BA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pk Ranger Modding - QLD 👍
Posts: 7,498
Default

AU motor = stuffing around to fit.
EF/EL motor = straight drop in and a simple job.
__________________
Owner of first ever car to retrofit BA SSS - the EA2BA

Send me a PM if you want to know anything

2010 Ford Ranger PK High Rider (Auto) - 2011 Ford Fiesta (Auto)
EA2BA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 01:20 PM   #10
Christiaan
Tuned @ Pitlane Frankston
 
Christiaan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: S.E Suburbs, Melbourne
Posts: 1,879
Default

Yeh, you wont be able to run the multi belt setup on an AU motor without it being a cut and shut job.

You'll need to run serpentine accessories.

EF/EL donk = straight drop in
__________________
BA MKII XR6 Turbo, 6sp Manual - Vibe purple, Premium sound, Sports leather, BA XR8 wheels, Koni adjustable suspension, Nizpro v/springs, Walbro in-tank pump, Siemens 60lb injectors, Process West stage 1 intercooler, Mal Wood 11" Option 3 clutch, Tripod gauges, Custom Mainlube T56 gearbox oil, ETM turbo oil feed line, Typhoon intake, BMC Panel filter, Turbosmart BOV, Tuned by Pit Lane Performance - 300.4rwkw @ 12psi
Christiaan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 01:27 PM   #11
EDXR6T
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EA2BA
AU motor = stuffing around to fit.
EF/EL motor = straight drop in and a simple job.
Stuffing around to fit?

Only mod is the sump. If its going in to an EF/L you have to mod the sump and K frame.

The price I quoted is including every thing, bar gearbox.
EDXR6T is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 01:32 PM   #12
XRated
Shoot.
 
XRated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shuresm58
Yeh, you wont be able to run the multi belt setup on an AU motor without it being a cut and shut job.

You'll need to run serpentine accessories.

EF/EL donk = straight drop in
Why would you bother retaining the crappy multi-belt setup anyway?

Granted the EF/EL is a straight drop-in, surely the extra effort of putting in an AU engine is well-worth the effort.
__________________


20V Turbo

XRated is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 01:51 PM   #13
EA2BA
PM me if you want
 
EA2BA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pk Ranger Modding - QLD 👍
Posts: 7,498
Default

I like to have clearance between parts I mean good clearance, 5mm or less between cross member and sump that has been ground down and lost some structural integrity is not very appealing to me is all.

Doesn't the bell housing also have to be changed too.
__________________
Owner of first ever car to retrofit BA SSS - the EA2BA

Send me a PM if you want to know anything

2010 Ford Ranger PK High Rider (Auto) - 2011 Ford Fiesta (Auto)
EA2BA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 01:58 PM   #14
EDXR6T
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EA2BA
I like to have clearance between parts I mean good clearance, 5mm or less between cross member and sump that has been ground down and lost some structural integrity is not very appealing to me is all.
If your engine is moving 5mm's back and forward I would rather find out why this is. I would rather a ground down sump over a dancing engine block any day.

even with lossing the 10mm or what ever it is off the front of the sump you still have the thincknes of the sump wall its self which is about 10mm.

If this setup can run fine with boost thru it and not develope any crack's or problems I cant see any harm an N/A will cause.

Bell housing needs two bolt holes drilled in the bottom. Or delete them.
EDXR6T is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 01:58 PM   #15
Sundeep
Banned
 
Sundeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Eastern Subs.
Posts: 2,281
Default

Just chuck the motor in yourself Brent, whatever you decide.

In case y'all don't know, this guy was the first to do a MPI conversion out of everyone on the original forums. Went through a lot of pain to help others by way of providing information on how to do it, including me.

Sundeep
Sundeep is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 02:01 PM   #16
EA2BA
PM me if you want
 
EA2BA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pk Ranger Modding - QLD 👍
Posts: 7,498
Default

The AU motor is so good because why, nothing too special about it, only thing going for it is that you can pick up a low K motor and not have to rebuild it, but if you dont get an AU2 motor you wont have a metal head gasket anyways. The Au motor also has alot less cams avaliable for it.
__________________
Owner of first ever car to retrofit BA SSS - the EA2BA

Send me a PM if you want to know anything

2010 Ford Ranger PK High Rider (Auto) - 2011 Ford Fiesta (Auto)
EA2BA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 02:08 PM   #17
EDXR6T
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EA2BA
The AU motor is so good because why, nothing too special about it, only thing going for it is that you can pick up a low K motor and not have to rebuild it, but if you dont get an AU2 motor you wont have a metal head gasket anyways. The Au motor also has alot less cams avaliable for it.
Surecam make good grinds so I dont now why people say there arnte any cams out there for them, People just arnte looking hard enough.

The pro's of an AU engine over an EF/L is..

There are alot more lower k blocks around, you get the extra comp (If its a series 2 upwards) And they are a proven reliable engine.

Plus good bang for buck.
EDXR6T is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 02:13 PM   #18
EA2BA
PM me if you want
 
EA2BA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pk Ranger Modding - QLD 👍
Posts: 7,498
Default

The EA motor was a proven reliable engine too, it just died at 515,000k

I guess it's what suits the person at the end of the day, and I prefer to stick with an EF/EL motor.
__________________
Owner of first ever car to retrofit BA SSS - the EA2BA

Send me a PM if you want to know anything

2010 Ford Ranger PK High Rider (Auto) - 2011 Ford Fiesta (Auto)
EA2BA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 02:26 PM   #19
EDXR6T
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EA2BA
The EA motor was a proven reliable engine too, it just died at 515,000k
It sure did.

Most Inline six Die at over half a million k's.

We'll keep it at "Each to there own"
EDXR6T is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 02:49 PM   #20
OED666
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OED666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ALL Throttle, and NO Bottle
Posts: 2,849
Default

Brent79 - If your car is in the same condition as i can remember, DO NOT GET RID OF IT!!!

Wack in an AU motor. The only mod required to fit is grind a small rib flat on the sump. it will not make it any weaker.

If you already have thermos your set. Get the AU accessories (alternator, p/s pump and ef/el ac compressor) you can use your existing manifolds, and your bellhousing will bolt up, but a couple of the bolts wont line up.

4000rpm launches with traction, and mine seeing 6000rpm more times than i care to remember hasnt removed the bellhousing yet.

if you have any questions, send me a pm, i will help you
__________________
Powered by Rollin Motorsport
Turbo Barra ED 4L
OED666 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 03:13 PM   #21
XRated
Shoot.
 
XRated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,909
Default

I thought there were some significant changes in the AU engines? Integrated sump, better (balanced?) crank, something to do with the girdle etc?...
__________________


20V Turbo

XRated is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 03:54 PM   #22
OED666
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OED666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ALL Throttle, and NO Bottle
Posts: 2,849
Default

http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=27259

From my AU engine conversion thead...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollin
...



All the differences between the motors are actually IMPROVEMENTS - smaller valve stems, springs, collets, cam lobes etc all contribute to lower valvetrain mass, meaning an engine that revs quicker and 'freer'


Au engines have a better rod to stroke ratio, meaning the rods don't have to work on as bigger angles, less side loading on bores means less wear, less power loss through friction, more revs, more hp.


Each main bearing cap is held in place by 6 bolts, instead of the two on our engines...again, stronger, stiffer, more reliable.

The head responds better to porting than any previous head, again, more possible hp.

AU engines poo all over earlier engines from a great height, no contest.*

Q: How fun is it to rev an engine to the end of the factory tacho, and have the car hammer all the way to 6000rpm?

A: Very fun...OED666 was kind enough to let me drive his car after we finished it, you couldn't wipe the smile off my dial with a sledgehammer.

*thats not to say earlier engines are poo, they are very very good, it's just AU engines are very very very good...
__________________
Powered by Rollin Motorsport
Turbo Barra ED 4L
OED666 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 08:24 PM   #23
Brent79
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 185
Default

Well thanks for all the replys! Ive decided to just go with a ED-4L block and throw the tickford head on... saves on alot of bugger-arsing around and i dont have to go buying new parts! AU engine would be nice but im not prepared to mod the engine any more so i dont see much point!! Thanks for the offer paul and yes its still in excellent condition! (Has been in garage most of the time)

Brent
__________________
EB1 Falcon Wagon
3.9L Multipoint with 5 speed manual
Pacemaker extractors & 2.5" Redback exhaust
Tickford Head and Wade 1004 cam
HP4 Chiptorque chip and XH intake

1992 DC LTD
5LTR DUEL FUEL
Brent79 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2007, 09:05 PM   #24
Walkinshaw
Two > One
 
Walkinshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
Default

Brent just chemiweld it back up. Cant stop at only 500,000
__________________
1978 LTD - 408ci - 11.5@120.6mph -
2004 S4 - 4.2 - M6 - quattro -

Walkinshaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL