Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2017, 01:04 PM   #1
Blue Dog
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,288
Default OBDLink MX WiFi Scan tool

What scan tools & software are you using on your Ford?

I have recently used an OBDLink MX WiFi unit & FORScan Lite on an android phone.

The OBDLink MX WiFi is unreliable & continuously disconnects rendering it useless.

What scan tool do you use that works consistently?
Blue Dog is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-03-2017, 08:12 PM   #2
GO FURTHER
Moderator
 
GO FURTHER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,940
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Fitting New Iridium Plugs & the state of the old ones - (Photo Essay) 
Default Re: OBDLink MX WiFi Scan tool

I have and use 3 scan / logging devices for my car;

1. The torque Pro app with a Bluetooth ELM adaptor on the OBDII port.

2. A physical scanner with LCD screen that plugs in directly to the port.

3. An SCT X4 flasher which also plugs in directly.

All have their advantages and disadvantages.

Obviously the ones that don't use Wi-Fi or Bluetooth and plug in directly to the port are quicker in operation and more reliable and have "instant on" when you turn the engine on.

If I'm just scanning for fault codes, then the physical scanner gets the job done fastest.

If I want to log functions then I prefer the SCT X4.
GO FURTHER is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 11:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL