Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2010, 01:50 PM   #1
R-Design
Guess Who's Back?
 
R-Design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,369
Default Ford Establishes Global Engineering Team For Future Performance Vehicles

I wonder what this means for FPV?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viknesh Vijayenthiran February 9th, 2010

Jost Capito. The name should ring a bell for most Ford performance fans but for the uninitiated he is the current chief of Ford's global performance vehicles and motorsports business development and one of the key men behind the 305 horsepower Ford Focus RS super-hatch sold overseas. With such credentials it's little wonder Ford has enlisted Capito to oversee the operations of all of its performance teams, working to create a "universal feel" for its lineup of performance vehicles sold around the world.

Capito's role will be to head Ford's Special Vehicle Team (SVT) in America and its RS team in Europe. By integrating the two divisions, future sporty Fords will be able to benefit from a single set of performance criteria and the latest in Blue Oval technology and know-how. The move also reaffirms Ford CEO Alan Mulally's desire for a unified Ford empire consisting of global engineering teams.

Speaking at the launch of the 2011 Ford Shelby GT500's aluminum-block V-8 engine, Capito explained that engineers will be flying back and forth between North America and Europe and are already working to fine-tune a common set of parameters used to evaluate a vehicle's handling and performance capabilities. Additionally, the move will also allow Ford to better integrate its motorsports developments into its road cars.

The good news for consumers is that future performance vehicles will be able to move from one region to another with only a little fine-tuning, paving the way for future versions of European-only models like the Fiesta RS and Focus RS to eventually be sold in North America--just don't ask anyone at Ford when this going to happen.
http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1...mance-vehicles

__________________
The 18th Letter
R-Design is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2010, 01:57 PM   #2
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default

Probably nothing, FPV volumes are too small for Detroit to worry about and half of it is owned by Prodrive anyway
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2010, 02:02 PM   #3
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,587
Default

In a fantasy world I wonder if the GRWD performance sedans will be based here. Who knows, alot of crap flying about lately.
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2010, 08:04 PM   #4
FPV
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 287
Default

Anyone able to shed any light on the implications for FPV? This announcement is just a tie-in to Jost Capito heading over to the U.S early last year to start this performance car amalgamation process. Capito reportedly visited Australia to test the FPV models, possibly FG prototypes according to Motor magazine. Not to mention some people have mentioned that FPV may not just be developing their new V8 for themselves.

The FPV brand appears to be established in the Australian market, it would be a shame to see any changes made to the brand. Best case is that this new development allows FPV a broader pool of technology to implement into its products.
FPV is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2010, 08:24 PM   #5
Luke Plaizier
Lukeyson
Donating Member1
 
Luke Plaizier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW
Posts: 2,584
Default

Established? So we mean established in terms of the whole Tickford/FPV period, or just the FPV period?

Prodrive haven't been around for that long in Australia remember. What would it mean to us if Ford pulled out of that patrnership and simply announced that they'd go it alone as SVT or RS in Australia? Would they still own the IP developed from the partnership with Prodrive? No one other than the partners would know the details of the business partnership between Ford and Prodrive. But being a partnership, I don't expect there to be contractual periods like TW has for HSV right?

However, given that Ford have the controlling stake, I'd imagine that Prodrive would probably just have to roll with whatever decision Ford makes.

It would be nice, though, if it meant the Focus RS made it out to Australia via FPV.

Should we be launching an email campaign to get FPV out to declare what this means for them?


Lukeyson
__________________
If the human brain was simple enough to understand, we'd be too simple to understand it.
Luke Plaizier is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2010, 08:43 PM   #6
FPV
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke Plaizier
Established? So we mean established in terms of the whole Tickford/FPV period, or just the FPV period?

Prodrive haven't been around for that long in Australia remember. What would it mean to us if Ford pulled out of that patrnership and simply announced that they'd go it alone as SVT or RS in Australia? Would they still own the IP developed from the partnership with Prodrive? No one other than the partners would know the details of the business partnership between Ford and Prodrive. But being a partnership, I don't expect there to be contractual periods like TW has for HSV right?

However, given that Ford have the controlling stake, I'd imagine that Prodrive would probably just have to roll with whatever decision Ford makes.

It would be nice, though, if it meant the Focus RS made it out to Australia via FPV.

Should we be launching an email campaign to get FPV out to declare what this means for them?


Lukeyson
Just the FPV era, though you could take it as far back as Tickford. The FPV era is now heading to its 7th year, time sure does fly...

http://www.fpv.com.au/news/news-arch...t.aspx?ID=1363

According to the above link, the initial Ford/Prodrive partnership agreement was for a five year term, ending in 2008, so I guess they just extended it?

For me its mainly not losing brand identity, if Ford brought FPV in-house and this enabled the FPV range to achieve a greater overall package for its vehicles then thats excellent.

You would think the Focus RS business case would be revisited with the strength of the Australian dollar of recent. It was the very reason Mr Barrett ruled the vehicle out late last year. You have to wonder if a sole Falcon focus would provide FPV a sustainable future?
FPV is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2010, 10:12 PM   #7
SSD-85
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,142
Default

Like Road Warrior said, probably wont mean much for FPV, other than engineering input/output with overseas. If anything itll be a good thing.
SSD-85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-02-2010, 02:05 AM   #8
morak001
460 - cubes torque
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Oz
Posts: 134
Default

Yeah, I don't think it'll mean much. FPV will, as usual, take the fords best and make it better..........
morak001 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-02-2010, 07:24 PM   #9
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

There was word that FPV would become part of the team early last year, but I never heard anthing else about it so who knows what happened?
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-02-2010, 07:39 PM   #10
gtfpv
GT
 
gtfpv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
Default

its ashame the yanks own ford . the falcon to me is better than any mustang ever.
it's aussie orientated and family based. i drove a mustang convertable in 1997 brand new with a v6 in it . the EL shat all over it in every way, and my xr8 left it for dead . if the mustang had a v8 that was 3 seconds quicker . i'd still prefer the falcon .
i dont know if australia has a national dish , but the falcon is our national heritage , and its ashame the yanks control it . i DO NOT WANT TO DRIVE AN AMERICAN FALCON
gtfpv is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-02-2010, 07:58 PM   #11
XR8putts
Guest
 
XR8putts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 2,886
Default

The Yanks created Ford Motor Company, owning it is a bi-product.
XR8putts is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-02-2010, 08:46 PM   #12
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtfpv
its ashame the yanks own ford . the falcon to me is better than any mustang ever.
it's aussie orientated and family based. i drove a mustang convertable in 1997 brand new with a v6 in it . the EL shat all over it in every way, and my xr8 left it for dead . if the mustang had a v8 that was 3 seconds quicker . i'd still prefer the falcon .
i dont know if australia has a national dish , but the falcon is our national heritage , and its ashame the yanks control it . i DO NOT WANT TO DRIVE AN AMERICAN FALCON
Have you forgotten that the Falcon was pretty much all american until the XA?
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-02-2010, 09:12 PM   #13
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,007
Default

Driving a '97 convertible Mustang V6 (a rental I assume) and using that as an opinion on the whole Mustang series of cars is quite ignorant.
Be like driving a EA 3.2 auto and claiming all Falcons are crap...
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-02-2010, 09:16 PM   #14
Luke Plaizier
Lukeyson
Donating Member1
 
Luke Plaizier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW
Posts: 2,584
Default

All opinions are valid though, even if your opinion of his opinion isn't very high.


Lukeyson
__________________
If the human brain was simple enough to understand, we'd be too simple to understand it.
Luke Plaizier is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-02-2010, 10:11 PM   #15
ebxr8240
Performance moderator
 
ebxr8240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St Clair..N.S.W
Posts: 14,875
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical advice. 
Default

Keep in mind Lincoln / Mercury is made by Ford also..
__________________
Real cars are not driven by front wheels,real cars lift them!!...
BABYS ARE BOTTLE FED, REAL MEN GET BLOWN.
Don't be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark...Professionals built the Titanic!
Dart 330ci block turbo black pearl EBXR8 482 rwkw..
Daily driver GTE FG..
Projects http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=107711
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...8+turbo&page=4
ebxr8240 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 03:35 AM   #16
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

I don't think FPV will change, until 2014. I think eventually the Ford perfomance divisions will be consolidated in to a global brand, I personally don't care what 3 letter acronym Ford uses just keep making good products.
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 07:37 AM   #17
Outback
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtfpv
its ashame the yanks own ford . the falcon to me is better than any mustang ever.
it's aussie orientated and family based. i drove a mustang convertable in 1997 brand new with a v6 in it . the EL shat all over it in every way, and my xr8 left it for dead . if the mustang had a v8 that was 3 seconds quicker . i'd still prefer the falcon .
i dont know if australia has a national dish , but the falcon is our national heritage , and its ashame the yanks control it . i DO NOT WANT TO DRIVE AN AMERICAN FALCON
Well Australians were drive US designed Falcons from 1960 to 1972, the XA was the first all Aussie designed Falcon.
Outback is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 09:12 AM   #18
Wally
XP Coupe
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,098
Default

Well not really all Aussie. It was designed in 1968 by a pommy import stylist wasn't it? Then it was clay modelled in Dearborn where some US signatures were added. At least that's the story we were told when they went on sale .. history is such a fickle thing.
Wally is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 12:23 PM   #19
gtfpv
GT
 
gtfpv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
Default

i'm trying to keep a little significance of australian engineering , our cars i think are suited to us and we like them . americans and europeans may not be suited to our cars or like them as much as us . i understand this , because thats the way i feel about thier cars . i'm just talking falcon and holden here . . nothing wrong with other makes , but they arent a falcon or commadore . do i want a BMW or merc AS A DAILY NO . AS A WEEKENDER YES . but my falcons go everywhere are comfortable for my roads and i can afford them because they are designed for australia for australians . a mustang , or merc , is not .
gtfpv is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 02:15 PM   #20
Luke Plaizier
Lukeyson
Donating Member1
 
Luke Plaizier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW
Posts: 2,584
Default

Well, the Shelby GT500 managed a credible LAST of the cars that were still running at the end of the day in the Bathurst 12 hr with Jason Bright at the wheel this last weekend.

If that's what the SVT boys come up with, do we want SVT to be doing the work in Australia or FPV?

http://www.bathurst12hour.com.au/live_results.html


Lukeyson
__________________
If the human brain was simple enough to understand, we'd be too simple to understand it.
Luke Plaizier is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 02:38 PM   #21
Chopped
as in chopped
 
Chopped's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,991
Default

Re Bathurst 12 hour >

Mustang Shelby fastest lap 2:33.8961 (finish time 12:02:39.7697)
-----
Clubsport R8 wagon - fastest lap 2:34.8274 (finish time 12:02:21.2155)
-----
FPV F6 Sedan - fastest lap 2:36.0153 (finish time 12:02:31.0364)
-----
BMW 335i Coupe - fastest lap 2:31.4736 (finish time 12:02:07.7469)

Germany still leads the way !
__________________
-> Reading this signature was pointless <-
Chopped is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 03:42 PM   #22
outback_ute
Ute Forum Moderator
Contributing Member
 
outback_ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 7,227
Default

Can hardly use a race car built days before the race with no shake-down as an indicator of its performance...
outback_ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 03:54 PM   #23
Scott
.
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 6,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outback_ute
Can hardly use a race car built days before the race with no shake-down as an indicator of its performance...
Correct. If the GT500 gets another run next year and developed/tested accordingly, it will be doing laps as quick if not quicker than anything else out there. To drop it off the hoist onto the racetrack at Bathurst and put in 120 laps within 2.5 seconds of the fastest car there is quite amazing. Imagine if they had time to test & tweak it!
Scott is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 04:39 PM   #24
Chopped
as in chopped
 
Chopped's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,991
Default

How does the GT500 fit under the $125000 cap ???
__________________
-> Reading this signature was pointless <-
Chopped is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 04:43 PM   #25
Luke Plaizier
Lukeyson
Donating Member1
 
Luke Plaizier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW
Posts: 2,584
Default

OK, I missed something here. Someone needs to point me to the article that says the GT500 was not race prepared, but every other car was.....


Lukeyson
__________________
If the human brain was simple enough to understand, we'd be too simple to understand it.
Luke Plaizier is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 04:53 PM   #26
bathurst77
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke Plaizier
All opinions are valid though, even if your opinion of his opinion isn't very high.


Lukeyson
whereas my opinion of your opinion his opinion of his opinion...
hang on im confused
bathurst77 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 07:38 PM   #27
Ghiadude
FORMERLY TX3DUDE
 
Ghiadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: "THE GONG"
Posts: 2,487
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke Plaizier
OK, I missed something here. Someone needs to point me to the article that says the GT500 was not race prepared, but every other car was.....


Lukeyson
I'm pretty sure what he meant was that the car was new and has not had a lot of development time. That Beemer has been part of the championship for a while.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by AL NZ
it wouldn't matter what FPV or FordOz call it, because it will be - The One.
Ghiadude is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 08:28 PM   #28
R-Design
Guess Who's Back?
 
R-Design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,369
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevypower
I don't think FPV will change, until 2014. I think eventually the Ford perfomance divisions will be consolidated in to a global brand, I personally don't care what 3 letter acronym Ford uses just keep making good products.
That makes a lot of sense considering the Falcon will be based off a global platform going forward. What's the point in having a separate division in Australia engineering specific vehicles for the local market?
__________________
The 18th Letter
R-Design is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 09:35 PM   #29
Scott
.
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 6,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghiadude
I'm pretty sure what he meant was that the car was new and has not had a lot of development time. That Beemer has been part of the championship for a while.
In essence.. Others far more in the know can come along and tell the whole story but the nuts and bolts of it are that the GT500 was basically delivered, stripped to a shell, put back together in race guise just in time to arrive for scrutineering.
Scott is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2010, 10:05 PM   #30
data_mine
GT-P With An Ego
Donating Member2
 
data_mine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 20,931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chopped
How does the GT500 fit under the $125000 cap ???
Easy, they're only like $50k in the US.

And if you're importing it for race only (i.e. don't need to RHD it) it'd be cheap.
__________________
1998 DL LTD in Sparkling Burgundy, daily, mild 5.0L, high end stereo, slow'n'thirsty - 138.8rwkw.
2006 BF GT-P in Ego, 5.8L all alloy, Kenne Bell 2.8HLC, Nizpro Stage 2 ZF - 440rwkw.
2008 SY F6X in Silhouette, custom billet parts, beginnings of a stereo, much more - 340awkw.

Ford Performance Club of ACT
data_mine is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL