Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2008, 01:35 PM   #1
sandmanls1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 151
Default FG XR6T UTe wins Motor BYFB

Latest isssue have it at home so not all the details, price range was 38k-50k was up against the FG XR6T sedan, SS Ute and Sedan, Mazda 3 MPS, Subaru WRX. Shoe in at @38,990.

sandmanls1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 02:04 PM   #2
TOASTED
JMM modded EF
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 955
Default

yee ha
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILLaViTaR

Guess the alcohol tax is turning people to mind altering drugs.
I drive : A heavily modified EF Fairmont with a JMM dev5 cam, worked head, 3.5" mandrel bent intake, exhaust, and a few other bits n pieces like a stally etc.

"She goes like a zirtek"

WANT A FAST FORD RING THIS BLOKE V V

Abbott Engines for HeadWork
20 years experience
PH Rob on (07) 5526 3883
TOASTED is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 02:10 PM   #3
phillyc
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phillyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always factual and beneficial. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandmanls1
Latest isssue have it at home so not all the details, price range was 38k-50k was up against the FG XR6T sedan, SS Ute and Sedan, Mazda 3 MPS, Subaru WRX. Shoe in at @38,990.
That is great news! What times did it do around the track and acceleration?
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s
226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013
14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013

Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell.

Retrotech thread
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6
phillyc is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 02:29 PM   #4
FalconXR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FalconXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,028
Default

Interesting.
Will have to go and buy the mag tonight.
But I could never see Motor giving a ute the BFYB gong...
FalconXR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 03:53 PM   #5
Ives
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ives's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 2,368
Default

Congratulations to Ford and the XR6T for taking the overall Bang For Your Buck 2008.
Ives is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 04:36 PM   #6
poolkeeper
Its Resonating!
 
poolkeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 1,612
Default

go the leaf springs haha
poolkeeper is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 04:44 PM   #7
TC200six
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brisbane, Qld
Posts: 3,321
Default

Oh YEAH! The FG Falcon won Motor Magazine's Bang For Your Buck!! :

...What? It was only the ute?
TC200six is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 05:51 PM   #8
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

HTF does a ute get into a performance vehicle magazine BFYB field in the first place?? :



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 06:04 PM   #9
EF Hoon
Sideways in my 33!
 
EF Hoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 144
Default

price bracket i think
EF Hoon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 06:16 PM   #10
nugget378
Weezland
 
nugget378's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney,workshop mod
Posts: 7,216
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to impart knowledge in the technical areas. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Vman
HTF does a ute get into a performance vehicle magazine BFYB field in the first place?? :
About the same way a family sedan or a mid sized hatchback does Id say...the utes would perform every bit as well as the sedan versions,and lets face it the falcon,commodore utes are more show pony than workhorse...
nugget378 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 06:31 PM   #11
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

It would have been better for the sedan to get it. Why all of a sudden do they require utes to be in there? For the past two years did they include the SS utes? I don't think so. I wonder how Ford will market this... (if they even bother)
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 06:41 PM   #12
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

I dunno, ive never been able to get my head around the concept of "performance" utes.. i accept that there's a market for them, but i still and will allways think of utes as predominantly workhorses....



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 08:10 PM   #13
Swordsman88
Getting it done.....
 
Swordsman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Vman
I dunno, ive never been able to get my head around the concept of "performance" utes.. i accept that there's a market for them, but i still and will allways think of utes as predominantly workhorses....
I agree 4Vman.....i don't get the concept either. Alot of people i know put forward a good case for them....practicality, only need 2 seat, damn fast still and pretty good handlers (even with the leaf springs) but they still don't seem right.

I would say the ute won over the sedan simply because its cheaper...BFYB is all about go versus cost and the XR6T ute certainly has that. What i find interesting is that it beat an SS ute apparently....given what you woudl think is similar pricing, the IRS of the SS should have given the falcon ute a run for its money....performance would be similar in a straight line?? Interesting, very interesting...
Swordsman88 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 08:17 PM   #14
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Vman
I dunno, ive never been able to get my head around the concept of "performance" utes.. i accept that there's a market for them, but i still and will allways think of utes as predominantly workhorses....
Yeah, it's weird. Then again, this is "BANG" for your buck. Not PCOTY. But why change the rules? I stand to be corrected if they've tested utes in the past.





Quote:
Originally Posted by Swordsman88
I agree 4Vman.....i don't get the concept either. Alot of people i know put forward a good case for them....practicality, only need 2 seat, damn fast still and pretty good handlers (even with the leaf springs) but they still don't seem right.

I would say the ute won over the sedan simply because its cheaper...BFYB is all about go versus cost and the XR6T ute certainly has that. What i find interesting is that it beat an SS ute apparently....given what you woudl think is similar pricing, the IRS of the SS should have given the falcon ute a run for its money....performance would be similar in a straight line?? Interesting, very interesting...
Good point. Imagine how dirty Ford (and AFF members) would be had the SS ute beaten the XR6T ute for the reasons you raise! All of a sudden Motor decide to include "utes" in their tests, and it just so happens the Ford gets pipped by it's rival.

The reason(s) would be more than outright grunt and handling, what it is I don't know till I read why as the SS ute is a decent bit of gear. Maybe it's the I6 turbo's rush, refinement and sophistication? Or maybe they just couldn't find time to test the SS cos they couldn't get out of the FG ute?
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.

Last edited by Falc'man; 12-08-2008 at 08:27 PM.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 08:23 PM   #15
bf tubs
Regular Member
 
 bf tubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 130
Default

the au2 xr8 ute was in it way back then so its not the first ute to be in bfyb
 bf tubs is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 08:26 PM   #16
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ute302
the au2 xr8 ute was in it way back then so its not the first ute to be in bfyb
Cheers.
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 09:34 PM   #17
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nugget378
About the same way a family sedan or a mid sized hatchback does Id say...the utes would perform every bit as well as the sedan versions,and lets face it the falcon,commodore utes are more show pony than workhorse...

Yep, Peformance come in all shapes and sizes! XR8-Ts/FPV's and SS/HSV's are (mainly, not very often you'll see a HSV or FPV as a genuine load carrier)bought as a two-door performance car with a big boot...

...but its funny that a (laughed at) leaf sprung ute won. :
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 09:50 PM   #18
DoreSlamR
Fiat POWAAH!
 
DoreSlamR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,309
Default

when do they run PCOTY? I think thats the one we need to look out for.
DoreSlamR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 09:53 PM   #19
Windsor220
Now Fordless
 
Windsor220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fremantle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Default

PCOTY - Ford Ranger turbo diesel.....
Windsor220 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 10:26 PM   #20
Swordsman88
Getting it done.....
 
Swordsman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falc'man



Good point. Imagine how dirty Ford (and AFF members) would be had the SS ute beaten the XR6T ute for the reasons you raise! All of a sudden Motor decide to include "utes" in their tests, and it just so happens the Ford gets pipped by it's rival.

The reason(s) would be more than outright grunt and handling, what it is I don't know till I read why as the SS ute is a decent bit of gear. Maybe it's the I6 turbo's rush, refinement and sophistication? Or maybe they just couldn't find time to test the SS cos they couldn't get out of the FG ute?
Yeah good one Falc'man! Motor has noted (from memory) in recent times that BFYB would be more inclusive in the general sense of 'on road' factors, like practicality, NVH etc.....whereas PCOTY would shift to true performance focus. Perhaps this helps explain the XR6T ute win...it does beat the SS ute in most of these areas i would say (even though it technically has a lower payload...that is wheel/tyre package related....anyone who believes an SS ute can truly carry more than a XR6T ute is kidding themselves IMO...).

Either way it is both funny that a leaf sprung vehicle can win such an award, but also a true feather in the cap of Ford Aus engineers. I haven't driven an FG ute but from what i have read, apart from crappy surfaces (more so with optional 19s) the FG utes aren't really behind the VE stuff anyway....more fun actually. Of course ride quality and outright grip isn't there on rough stuff....but still, they seem to have done a truly great job with the new rear end.

Maybe the FG boys looked over the shoulder of the team working on the T6 light truck?? That is supposed to be gunning for the best light commerical ute in the world according to rumours out of Ford Aus engineering....tough and practical but bringing handling and NVH never seen before in light commercials. Kinda cool what can be done with 'ancient' technology when you tune it properly......
Swordsman88 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2008, 10:52 PM   #21
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

Awesome news on the T6. That's another "BFYB" win Ford, that is, always able to come up with the best value for the budget given to them.

Yeah SM88, I remember the live axled AU being rated as good as the IRS VT with regards to ride and handling, except for when it got overly rough.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-08-2008, 08:02 AM   #22
mcnews
Trev
 
mcnews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Was Perth, now country Vic
Posts: 8,017
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Trev has owned several boosted fords and has really contributed a lot of info on them. His posts in the bike section are also very helpful. I think he should be recognised as a technical contributor. 
Default

That is the drawback with the leafs, when things get bumpy, mid corner bumps can see the rear out very quickly but overall the leaf sprung ute on smooth surfaces seems to break away later and more gradually than the Turbo sedan we had at the same time. Throw bumps in and no contest, but on smooth tarmac the leafs seemed better. But it could just be that way due to a better track measurement or whatever than the sedan.
__________________
Trev
(FPV FG II GT-E thus the fully loaded burger with the lot as standard +Alpine/Dynamat fitout - 2 of only 4 ever made GT-E factory 9" rear rims - Michelin Pilot Supersports - Shockworks Suspension)
mcnews is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL