|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
18-05-2006, 01:35 PM | #1 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 185
|
The government has been keeping a secret about automobiles under wraps for the past 30 years. What's the secret? Your car is not getting the gas mileage promised on the showroom sticker. The actual mpg could be as much as 50% lower. Say what?
Consumer Reports' David Champion reported, "People are going into showrooms, they're looking at that sticker that says miles per gallon and they're saying, 'Oh it get goods miles per gallon, but in reality, they're being cheated." Automotive manufacturers put cars through a simulated city course. Next the highway -- a real highway. For the third test, they take the car out on a 150-mile day trip throughout Connecticut. All the while, a special miles per gallon meter is ticking away. Their results? Many numbers you see on those stickers are off way off -- one as much as 50 percent. Consumer Reports did their own real-life tests and came up with very different mpg results. For example: Honda claims its hybrid Civic sedan gets 48 mpg in the city. Consumer Reports found it only gets 26 mpg -- a 46 percent difference. Read the news report for test results on other cars. The EPA has said a change is coming in time for the 2008 models, but admits there is no perfect test. http://www.wesh.com/news/9141621/det...subid=10100244 |
||
18-05-2006, 01:39 PM | #2 | ||
Purveyor of filth
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,958
|
Those "official" fuel consumption figures I tend to take with a grain of salt. There are prime examples of stock BA's for one, where one will exhibit figures of 14L/100km in combo driving and some can pull 10L/100km.
|
||
18-05-2006, 01:49 PM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pakenham, Victoria
Posts: 6,983
|
Thing is it'll very for every driver.
BA I6's are odd. My dads gets 14/15L/100km yet his boss used one temporarily that saw 11L/100km. Now my dad would almost kill to get that type of milage. I'm not doing to bad in my Astina 1.8l. I put a sports exhaust on and dropped it from 9.9L/100km ->8.9L/100km. My EL's getting 15L/100km which isn't too bad really considering it's engine is 2.2lt larger than the Astina. Lowest I've every got from the EL is 13.5L/100km If anyone's interested in working theirs out? Click below http://www.accommodationz.co.nz/economycalculator.html
__________________
74 XB Fairmont (street car) 11.07@123.02mph. 08 LV Ford Focus XR5 (daily). Tuned by Hallam Performance |
||
18-05-2006, 02:00 PM | #4 | ||
LPG > You
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
|
Have you seen the outrageous figures the US EPA posts? I don't know how they test their cars, but according to them, a 7-litre V8 Corvette Z06 is more economical then some small, 2.5 V6 engined cars... until you test them in the real world and, well, yeah.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1. : |
||
18-05-2006, 02:01 PM | #5 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 628
|
Quote:
my old LTD gets around 13L/100 and its one of the old leaded 4.1L crossflows! sure enough that site calculated 13.07L/100, 21MPG |
|||
18-05-2006, 04:27 PM | #6 | ||
Was BRT-351 now BRT-393
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Blue Mts NSW
Posts: 197
|
I find it varies alot on your driving style.
I usually average 10.3L/100Km in my BA, but I leant my car to a friend and it went up to 11.2L/100Km. He wasn't hammering it though, he just takes off quicker from lights and puts the foot down to go up hills. All comes down to driving style. |
||
18-05-2006, 04:33 PM | #7 | ||
turboute
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 502
|
One of my bosses gets about 10L per 100 in his Slightly Modified CV8 Monaro...
So one of the other workmates bought himeself a SSZ Ute - the way he drives though he wont get anywhere near 10L/100 |
||
18-05-2006, 04:50 PM | #8 | ||
EA V8 & AU II 4.0 Forte
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 163
|
Links very good.
Answer for my car is not so good. Then again i didn't build it for fuel economy, i built it for fun :baby bott :baby bott 18L/per 100kms when cruising, 26.42L/per 100kms when driving a little bit more enthusiastic. 31.65L/per 100 when driving like a noob. :baby bott She's a drinker, i can tell you that. Then again what do i expect my Factory TripMeter is always saying 20-30 on the instantanious consumption meter cruising and goes close to 99 when i take off from the lights. |
||
18-05-2006, 04:54 PM | #9 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
|
i find the stickers good as far as comparing each vehicle to each other - real world economy might be different, but to be totally accurate, i could not compare another vehicle to mine in exactly the same way without owning it - so if they all use the same testing process, and we just use the figures for comparitive purposes only (which is what is usually indicated) - then they can be useful
|
||
18-05-2006, 05:36 PM | #10 | |||
Burnin Rubber
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,824
|
A car manufacturer lying to us to make a sale is not a new concept, its just getting more difficult for them to hide things.
__________________
2001 AUII Forte (LPG) K&N Air Filter Tickford Air Intake ***Coming Soon: Clear Side Repeaters*** Quote:
|
|||
18-05-2006, 06:26 PM | #11 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 138
|
I reckon, as a general rule of thumb, the quoted city economy is close to what you'll get in day-to-day driving.
I know with my old Pintara, the economy was 8hwy/10.5city, and I used to get around 10.5 often. I'm getting 12ishL/100km from the Falcon as well.
__________________
My first E-series: (*gone* :() 1994 EF Futura Current Ride: 1993 Ford Telstar GLX, maroon manual sedan, Alpine CD player |
||
18-05-2006, 06:33 PM | #12 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisbane, St Lucia
Posts: 153
|
I managed 220km on 22L 10L/100km average in my XF Stage 2 4.1 with EFI on the weekend. Freak occurance usually about 14L/100 highway and 20L/100 in the city. Hope it stays that way. 150k's of that was on the highway doing 110 with T5 and 2.92 gears
|
||
18-05-2006, 06:36 PM | #13 | ||
BASS ON BOARD!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tweed Heads NSW
Posts: 2,194
|
Hmm I get awesome economy!
600 kms to a tank (best has been 682) 68L tank? 11.3 per 100 that’s will WOT and fun. Can inc a trip to willowbank! The worse economy I ever get is 500km to a tank 13.6 per 100kms
__________________
Nothing interesting to put here. |
||
18-05-2006, 09:38 PM | #14 | |||
Ute Forum Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 7,227
|
Is anyone surprised road testers don't get the official economy figures, they are normally pushing the cars hard at least some of the time (if not most). Most people would not drive to maximise economy as evidenced by the figures above. Of course the manufacturers are going to give the best figures possible!
Quote:
|
|||
18-05-2006, 10:20 PM | #15 | ||
Get in the van!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 1,110
|
To get the figure listed on the sticker you might want to use the highest gear possible and turn those pesky things like the stereo and aircon off! Driving style is the biggest variable which is why I'm getting 450km out of a 35L fill in my Fiesta and some other drivers on the forum are getting 650km. Still, it's a damn sight cheaper to run than my Falcon and I enjoy it just as much.
__________________
The Dad Bus (TM): 2004 BA XT Wagon, soon to be set up as a camper and tourer. |
||
19-05-2006, 05:06 AM | #16 | ||
hunting 300kw's
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bendigo
Posts: 1,371
|
my ef gets 11.7L/100km and i'm always giving it some poop
according to that calculator my ba xr6 ute used to get 15.2/100 which wouldn't suprise me it almost always displayed 99/100 whenever i would take off
__________________
current ride: '04 XR6 Turbo, Phantom, Premium sound.BluePower Enhanced 236.9rwkw 8psi DAMN VALVE SPRINGS (stock 13.82 @ 106.08 HPR)(8psi 13.29 @ 103.93) '99 r8 clubsport, leather, sunroof, 6speed, yeah the turbo is faster..... |
||
19-05-2006, 07:27 AM | #17 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 1,488
|
So, what does this have to do with the government?
On a side note, when the hell is the USA going to get out of the stone age and go metric? |
||
19-05-2006, 06:05 PM | #18 | ||
What's green is gold
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Shepparton
Posts: 3,079
|
im lucky to get 400km out of the EA... as for the XD....i dont want to know....
__________________
EF XR8 - Koni's - Cam and Headwork -3.9s - Ex VIC TMU - 1982 Nissan Patrol - 460 ci Big Block soon - Semi Gloss Black - Dark Tint - 4x 6" Infinity Kappa Perfect Splits - 5" Kappa 2 ways - Kappa 6x9's - 2x12" Kappa perfect subs - 2x4 Channel and 2x Mono Kappa amps- |
||