Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-08-2011, 10:02 PM   #1
brad`
The Monty
 
brad`'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Geelong
Posts: 1,226
Default VCT vs I6

ok so simply is it worth putting a VCT in or just leaving the I6 in, just woundering thats all, i heard the VCT is a good motor but thats about all i heard, also heard u can upgraded them internally to much

__________________

brad` is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-08-2011, 10:24 PM   #2
Day-mow
rexnet
 
Day-mow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 3,562
Default Re: VCT vs I6

stick with the I6 man. easier for cam up grades.
__________________
MY06 WRX Build Not Bought
Collingrove Hill Climb- 38.79

Remember it is the internet,So beware of trolls, If you argue with trolls the kids will laugh at you

Follow me on twitter @ Day_mow
Day-mow is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-08-2011, 10:27 PM   #3
XRGhia
meh.
Donating Member3
 
XRGhia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Was Central Coast, Now Sydney NSW
Posts: 8,584
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Contributions in the technical arena. 
Default Re: VCT vs I6

Yeah, as Damo said, Cam choice is limited with the VCT engine...


I'm not looking forward to finding a decent cam for the EF when the time comes (Now runs an AU 4L VCT engine)...
__________________
Previous - BF XR6T - 325rwkw, 6 Speed Auto, Process West, X-Force and Turbosmart gear
XRGhia is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-08-2011, 10:31 PM   #4
phillyc
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phillyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always factual and beneficial. 
Default Re: VCT vs I6

You can get good cams from Crescent Motorsport for the VCT.

I played around with the VCT when using Sniper Tuning in a dyno session. It definitely has it's worth, even with a stock camshaft.
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s
226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013
14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013

Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell.

Retrotech thread
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6
phillyc is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-08-2011, 12:14 AM   #5
Day-mow
rexnet
 
Day-mow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 3,562
Default Re: VCT vs I6

Quote:
Originally Posted by phillyc
You can get good cams from Crescent Motorsport for the VCT.

I played around with the VCT when using Sniper Tuning in a dyno session. It definitely has it's worth, even with a stock camshaft.
this is quite true.
contemplating getting a cam from Joe @ CMS.and will be tuning it soon hopefully.

however many other cam manufacture's run when you say VCT SOHC
__________________
MY06 WRX Build Not Bought
Collingrove Hill Climb- 38.79

Remember it is the internet,So beware of trolls, If you argue with trolls the kids will laugh at you

Follow me on twitter @ Day_mow
Day-mow is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-08-2011, 12:52 AM   #6
SSD-85
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,142
Default Re: VCT vs I6

IMO upgrade the I6 or drop a V8 in.

Thats just based on my own experience with the VCT engine.
SSD-85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-08-2011, 11:32 AM   #7
Mr Hardware
Flairs - Truckers Delight
 
Mr Hardware's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brisbane Northside Likes: Opposite Lock
Posts: 5,731
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: The excellent how to on LPG jet cleaning. 
Default Re: VCT vs I6

The only thing you can 'upgrade' by going to the VCT motor is to 'upgrade' how much profit the guy at the servo makes this month.
VCT: power of a 6, economy of an 8.
__________________
Current: Silhouette Black 2007 SY Ford Territory TX RWD 7-seater "Black Banger"
2006-2016: Regency Red 2000 AUII Ford Falcon Forte Automatic Sedan Tickford LPG "Millennium Falcon"
Mr Hardware is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-08-2011, 05:35 PM   #8
smoo
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
smoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,269
Default Re: VCT vs I6

To be fair Mr Hardware, back when the AU was new the VCT (aswell as the standard I6) made the 5.0 Holden and Ford and just about every other 6 cylinder/V6 on ther market look very lame. 175 kw SS and XR8 and 172kw XR6 and about 30odd nm short of the V8s with low 8l/100km fuel economy, can't complain myself. Pretty sure the base model V8s back then had 165kw too.
smoo is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2011, 01:11 PM   #9
SSD-85
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,142
Default Re: VCT vs I6

Quote:
Originally Posted by smoo
To be fair Mr Hardware, back when the AU was new the VCT (aswell as the standard I6) made the 5.0 Holden and Ford and just about every other 6 cylinder/V6 on ther market look very lame. 175 kw SS and XR8 and 172kw XR6 and about 30odd nm short of the V8s with low 8l/100km fuel economy, can't complain myself. Pretty sure the base model V8s back then had 165kw too.
The EL Update & AU XR8s were 185kw and absolutely embarrassed the SS, even the Clubsport. Base model V8 AUs were 175kw.

Even the XR6HP beat the VCT XR6 due to weight differences. The VCT made absolutely no sense, except saving a couple of dollars come rego renewal. A saving easily lost at the bowser.

Mr Hardware is right on the money; AU VCT = Power of a 6, Economy of an 8.

As you can tell, I dont like them much. And after owning one, its justified. XR6HP/XR8 FTW.
SSD-85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2011, 01:15 PM   #10
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default Re: VCT vs I6

dunno if its worth the extra kw, that said , the vct are certainly no slouch.
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2011, 08:26 PM   #11
smoo
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
smoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,269
Default Re: VCT vs I6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty85
The EL Update & AU XR8s were 185kw and absolutely embarrassed the SS, even the Clubsport. Base model V8 AUs were 175kw.

Even the XR6HP beat the VCT XR6 due to weight differences. The VCT made absolutely no sense, except saving a couple of dollars come rego renewal. A saving easily lost at the bowser.

Mr Hardware is right on the money; AU VCT = Power of a 6, Economy of an 8.

As you can tell, I dont like them much. And after owning one, its justified. XR6HP/XR8 FTW.
If ya say so, saying a AU XR8 beat the VT1 SS is like comparing a snail to a sloth. 0.5l/100km is hardly a huge difference between VCT and standard I6 (I've owned both). And I challenge ya to get that sort of gas mileage from an underpowered wheezer 5.0 (which struggled to make more power and torque than the VCT, as you point out). From my experience the only V8 that will give the similar fuel economy to the VCT was my old 300hp 540i BMW, 8.5l/100km, against my old Fairlanes 8-8.5. Good luck doing that in any wheezer or Holden cast iron lump.
smoo is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2011, 11:31 AM   #12
Cadge
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 226
Default Re: VCT vs I6

What models did the VCT come out with? I dropped an XR6 engine into my fairmont, but would have not idea if it was an I6 or VCT... am i correct in assuming the VCT had VCT on the top and I6 had nothing (appart from being red)
__________________
AUI Ford Fairmont | Lowered with Kings | XR8 Leather Interior | XR6 Tickford Engine and Gear box|
Cadge is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2011, 03:53 PM   #13
SlipKnoT
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 105
Default Re: VCT vs I6

the vct also had a red rocker cover but it had vct intech written on it and like silver lines on top
SlipKnoT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2011, 04:35 PM   #14
zakjames
Regular Member
 
zakjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 143
Default Re: VCT vs I6

Why does the VCT use up so much more fuel if what you guys is saying is true?

I could only imagine it would be more economic due to the variable cams.
I am yet to drive a I6 HP engine but im very happy with my VCT now.

What sort of L/100Km do both engines run roughly?
zakjames is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2011, 04:48 PM   #15
2002au
Define definitive
 
2002au's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: hobart, tas
Posts: 587
Default Re: VCT vs I6

Quote:
Originally Posted by zakjames

What sort of L/100Km do both engines run roughly?
my non-vct xr6 uses 8.6 L/100km. also its a manual
__________________
BF F6 TYPHOON in NEO #718 ~ 356rwkw :
BF XR6 TURBO in SILHOUETTE
2002au is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2011, 06:03 PM   #16
smoo
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
smoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,269
Default Re: VCT vs I6

Quote:
Originally Posted by zakjames
Why does the VCT use up so much more fuel if what you guys is saying is true?

I could only imagine it would be more economic due to the variable cams.
I am yet to drive a I6 HP engine but im very happy with my VCT now.

What sort of L/100Km do both engines run roughly?
All my driving is highway, my past AUs would consistently get...

AU Futura 7.6l/100km
2nd Futura, 7.9l/100m
Fairlane VCT, 8l/100km
Fairmont wagon, 9.6-10l/100km
XR6 manual ute VCT, 8.5l/100km

I think the ute and wagon shapes may effect fuel consumption (?).
Buggered if I know where the VCT 'power of a 6 economy of an 8' comes from.
If anything the 5.0 V8s have the power of a 6 and economy of an XJS Jag. The fact both sound so good and have huge aftermarket support saves their ****.
smoo is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2011, 06:03 PM   #17
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default Re: VCT vs I6

vct equipped models also had the heavier irs , there`s probably not much in it , living in the burbs of good old melbourne, mostly stop start driving, i`ve had it as low as 350 k`s to the tank on rare occasions, the usual for me is 400/450 k`s to the tank per week , driving with economy in mind 500 +, highway without much effort 700 plus, i reckon that`s pretty reasonable, i`m happy with it anyway.
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2011, 06:28 PM   #18
zakjames
Regular Member
 
zakjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 143
Default Re: VCT vs I6

Hmmmmm on average im getting just over 10L/100km usually about 11L. Mostly highway driving - O2 sensor?
zakjames is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-08-2011, 10:40 AM   #19
Day-mow
rexnet
 
Day-mow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 3,562
Default Re: VCT vs I6

Quote:
Originally Posted by zakjames
Hmmmmm on average im getting just over 10L/100km usually about 11L. Mostly highway driving - O2 sensor?
yeah thats pretty high for hwy driving. give o2 sensor a go
__________________
MY06 WRX Build Not Bought
Collingrove Hill Climb- 38.79

Remember it is the internet,So beware of trolls, If you argue with trolls the kids will laugh at you

Follow me on twitter @ Day_mow
Day-mow is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-08-2011, 04:10 PM   #20
XR_6falcon
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Suburbs, Mexico
Posts: 483
Default Re: VCT vs I6

you guys are getting good figures, i get 350 to a tank driving like an old person :(
__________________
Big dreams, not enough money

Smoke tyres, not drugs
XR_6falcon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-08-2011, 04:20 PM   #21
XR6SQ
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 56
Default Re: VCT vs I6

I got over 800kms out of my ute mostly on the highway a few weeks ago. They deffinately do not like driving in the city though.
__________________
AU111 XR6 Ute, VCT, Leather, Manual.
XR6SQ is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-08-2011, 12:55 PM   #22
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default Re: VCT vs I6

a lot of the economy is in the treatment of the pedal i think, mines a pensioner special so most of the time it`s driven gently, only rare occasions the horns comes out
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-08-2011, 09:25 PM   #23
RobVee
Regular Member
 
RobVee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Berwick
Posts: 64
Default Re: VCT vs I6

my fairlane has the vct i6 and it goes great, a smooth ride and more than enough power if needed
in terms of econmy it is usully round the 400-450 km per tank in south east melbourne suburbs commuting day to day. out on the open road i have got it well over 650 km before i felt like topping up.
RobVee is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-08-2011, 09:40 PM   #24
dieseltrain79
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 905
Default Re: VCT vs I6

Ive had my VCT Fairmont Ghia for 2.5 years . Bought it with 128k and now has 156k on it . It gets some highway work , and mostly short trips round town .

It has averaged 13.9L/100km in this time of usage .

Not bad for a car that has always had 1 child seat ( now 2 ) and is just stock as a rock . Keeps the wife happy , and has loads of room as well as all the options .

If she wants a taste of speed, Soarer it is , otherwise slushbox is nice to drive .
__________________
1998 AU VCT Ghia - Stock as a rock - Wifes car

1991 Toyota Soarer TT - 11.72 @ 116.7mph

2004 Ford Escape XLT V6 - Family Ride .
dieseltrain79 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-08-2011, 10:06 PM   #25
Jimmyd
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 734
Default Re: VCT vs I6

AU 1.5 Fairmont Ghia - urban 13.5l/100klm, Hwy 8l/100klm

Jimmyd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 02:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL