Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24-06-2006, 07:06 PM   #1
charles_wif_xf
Purveyor of filth
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,958
Default Ford US future

Here's an article from MSNBC about Ford and GM's futures:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13489697/

Make of it what you will

charles_wif_xf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-06-2006, 01:27 AM   #2
G6ET8U
GTX Turbo & KB Blown
 
G6ET8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Whistling, GTX.
Posts: 2,937
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: ALWAYS goes out of his way to help others in need, never posts rubbish only facts he has learnt the hard way or with success in his personal experiance. Takes the time to aid more junior members and overall is a solid contributor to AFF. 
Default

Very sad for both companies... just goes to show that if you rest on your laurel's, then be prepared to pay the piper...

Jack
__________________
DARTH 2008 FG G6ET
465.6rwkw
not a 10 @ 134.81 MPH

SNOW WHITE 2004 BA FPV PURSUIT
2.6L Kenne Bell
Brembos all round
Twin Screw Awesomeness


Supported, serviced and tuned by
BLUEPOWER RACING DEVELOPMENTS

http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11354744
G6ET8U is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-06-2006, 03:39 PM   #3
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

By the sounds of it Ford dont need a finance analyst but a paid assassin.
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-06-2006, 03:42 PM   #4
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,587
Default

Both are in trouble, and both deserve what they get.

The rest of the empire can atleast adpat, except of course the one with the biggest cash flow
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 11:45 AM   #5
charles_wif_xf
Purveyor of filth
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,958
Default

What do they expect, they make turdheaps like the Taurus and 4 cylinder Mustangs (in Ford's case) and they expect to sell them by the boatload? They finally are making a product that the Seppo's love, those cursed SUV's being example one but how sustainable coud that be?
charles_wif_xf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 11:56 AM   #6
OzJavelin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OzJavelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charles_wif_xf
What do they expect, they make turdheaps like the Taurus and 4 cylinder Mustangs (in Ford's case) and they expect to sell them by the boatload? They finally are making a product that the Seppo's love, those cursed SUV's being example one but how sustainable coud that be?
That's only part of the reason .. the MAJORITY of it for both Ford and GM is the Unions holding them to randsom.
OzJavelin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 12:40 PM   #7
aualright
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charles_wif_xf
What do they expect, they make turdheaps like the Taurus and 4 cylinder Mustangs (in Ford's case) and they expect to sell them by the boatload? They finally are making a product that the Seppo's love, those cursed SUV's being example one but how sustainable coud that be?
Wasn't the Taurus the most popular selling large sedan for a time there?

****
aualright is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 12:54 PM   #8
4.9 EF Futura
Official AFF conservative
 
4.9 EF Futura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 3,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR6T8_U
Very sad for both companies... just goes to show that if you rest on your laurel's, then be prepared to pay the piper...

Jack
Very apt comment Jack. Well put.

However, "the market" has got it wrong before. You're talking about the expected probability - determined between buyers and sellers - of the company needing default/bankruptcy insurance.

It's a very 'rounabout' way of determining a company's health. Having said this, be sure the buyers and sellers have all crunched their numbers...
__________________
A cup half empty... but full of euphoria.
4.9 EF Futura is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 12:57 PM   #9
4.9 EF Futura
Official AFF conservative
 
4.9 EF Futura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 3,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzJavelin
That's only part of the reason .. the MAJORITY of it for both Ford and GM is the Unions holding them to randsom.
In all fairness, the companies probably could have sustained the beating they cop from their workers if they had been able to protect their market share. Ford losing 8% (of a market which has variances larger than our overall activity) over a decade is a MASSIVE shift.

I think it's fair to say that the unions and management have contributed to the quagmire they find themselves in.
__________________
A cup half empty... but full of euphoria.
4.9 EF Futura is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 01:28 PM   #10
Hally
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 400
Default

I think it would be sad for the the USA & the industrial world in general if Ford and/or GM went belly up.

We all know the reasons why they are struggling, such as health care and pension liabilities to current and retired employees, wrong and sometimes dodgy product etc.

What peeves me is the lack of 'nationalism' to these companies. Both Ford & GM provided hundreds of thousands of jobs to Americans as well as great health and retirement benefits that literally millions of people benefited from. The Japanese manufactures have only relatively recently started building cars and trucks in the US. They have been given huge concessions by unions and state governments because they offer the carrot of building factories in rural areas were unemployment is huge, and if they don't get those concession they basically say'stuff it, we will import because all you suckers will buy our product anyway'.

A greater example of this in the USA is Walmart. They have basically wiped out consurmer goods manufaturing over there because they import everything and local manufacturers cannot compete.

Just my rant........
Hally is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 02:12 PM   #11
Abacus
Life's a Gas
 
Abacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,029
Default

Interesting article in US mag Car & Driver - "Fords that could save Ford now, if they were for sale in North America":

http://www.caranddriver.com/features...-ghia-awd.html
Abacus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 02:16 PM   #12
Abacus
Life's a Gas
 
Abacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,029
Default

And from July 2004 "We get the Taurus. Mr. and Mrs. Australia get a kick-butt cop cruiser":

http://www.caranddriver.com/specialt...xr6-turbo.html
Abacus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 04:05 PM   #13
OzJavelin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OzJavelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
Default

Chrysler have been "against the wall" quite a few times during 70s, 80s, 90s .. and now they are *relatively* sitting pretty. I think Ford and GM will come thru this and maybe for the better

[ I'm an expect on orphaned brands .. I've owned Studebakers, Ramblers, AMCs, Plymouths, etc .. ]

Rod.
OzJavelin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 04:24 PM   #14
Gubas
- BOOYEH -
 
Gubas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Geelong
Posts: 869
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abacus
And from July 2004 "We get the Taurus. Mr. and Mrs. Australia get a kick-butt cop cruiser":

http://www.caranddriver.com/specialt...xr6-turbo.html

LOL. thats a good read that one.
Here are some pretty funny quote from that article

Quote:
Originally Posted by caranddriver.com
Ford calls the engine the “Boss 260,” but to Australians it’s a hallowed “vee-bloody-eight.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by caranddriver.com
For American mid-size buyers, Ford excretes the tired, charm-free front-drive Taurus with a Tupperware interior and floppy handling. Meanwhile, Australians get their kicks in a rear-drive bomb with wind-smoothed sheetmetal and a Euro-tune suspension. Where’s the justice?
__________________
1993 EBII Fairmont Turbo T04e 7 psi
Gubas is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 05:30 PM   #15
Stoney!
Happy Volkswagen owner
 
Stoney!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Manly
Posts: 256
Default

This would be awful if one of both of these giants were to fall, whichever one it was. I hope that if this were to happen to either or both, that either Holden or ford australia could continue to operate, Ford australia are doing very well for themselves compared to approx 6 -8 years ago when constantly in the red and borrowing dollars of the Australian government.

These days it seems the only subsiduries of the USA giants that are making any money are their down under car makers. I would love to know what would happen to their australian subsideries if they were to file for bakruptcy. Mind you the only thing that has probably brought for into the spot light is that GM ar picking up a bit now, i read somwhere in a news report, when I have time i will try and post it on here.

One thing that was said in a wheels magazine is that inside GM the spotlight is on Holden being the only part of GM now making any money for the company.

Both GM and Ford need to start sorting out which is their best models, such as the Focus and falcon, spend a **** load of money on them and mass produce them around the globe, similar to what toyota does (who are doing very well for themselves) only thing being is this may change the way our cars are a little, but more so for the better I think..... Any thing would be good to save the parent companies of our much loved brands.

Stoney!
Stoney! is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL