|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-06-2007, 07:27 PM | #1 | ||
GT
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
|
anyone read the GTS and TYPHOON . comparo. biased do you think or factual. i'm not putting down GTS . as i'd have one no worries . however i have to question the put downs towards FPV. IT DESCRIBES THE boss 5.4 AS A SLUG, AND DOUGHY. IT ALSO SAYS THE GTS has moregrunt all over the typhoon.
anyone know why holdens always get a better wrap than any ford . ?? are they really faster ,all the time . i'd punch anyone in the mouth if they drove a GT. and called it doughy, sluggish. it just simply is not the case. i find myself reserved from driving mine . because it is just almost not practical for the road . anything over 4000rpm will create police pulling you over, if in thier vicinity. the mag doesnt completely bag the typhoon , but simply states that th GTS IS a better car all over , including performance . the typhoon, i believe would easily be on par with the 6 litre . i dont thing the boss 290 is far behind either. |
||
06-06-2007, 07:29 PM | #2 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,587
|
Its funny because from what I heard the Bosses characteristics are actually intentional. The problem is that the fun is over to quickly. Im sure this will be addressed soon, it has to be.
IMO if you drive a Boss on its own, its still very impressive, just not so much so when you do a back to back with the LS2. And why was it dicussing the Boss if the comparison was between the GTS and F6, oh thats right its Wheels..... :togo:
__________________
Last edited by Polyal; 06-06-2007 at 07:35 PM. |
||
06-06-2007, 07:33 PM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 549
|
Yeah true! I dont really think we will see a day where Wheels will be biased towards the ford's/Fpv,s of any description. They just are not there favourites and holdens are, it really winds me up too! I now look at the mag when im in the shop if its Pro Holden everwhere you look, i dont bother with it.
__________________
BA 03XR6T, 968's, SS CAI, PWR Cooler,Nizpro valve springs, BMC,Typhoon 18's, Brembos, 3 1/2' cat back Future mods Blisten shocks and King springs.391rwhp |
||
06-06-2007, 07:38 PM | #4 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 308
|
Quote:
It has more power and a wider power band so of corse it has the edge the typhoon is not on par with the new 6 litre holdens but hey, the typhoon is old and boring now. wait untill orion |
|||
06-06-2007, 07:40 PM | #5 | |||
LPG > You
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
|
Quote:
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1. : |
|||
06-06-2007, 07:40 PM | #6 | |||
AWD Assassin
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,170
|
Quote:
I doubt they've driven the 6 speed auto to its potential yet........ I've driven the R8 enough times now to tell you that there ain't that much in it. Remember, these articles are written by the same clowns that couldn't extract a better time than 14.3 for the GT over the 1/4 when the rest of us seem to be getting 14 flat and sub 14's as well...........no problem. I read the article and the biggest let down for the F6 was the lack of DSC or ESP. FPV should be chastised for this..........and rightly so. In fact there is another thread that we have discussed this on. Overall, the 5.4 in its current guise is on its way out.......so its no surprise that they are giving it a hard time. It just amuses me to read back over some of the earlier editions of WHEELS and MOTOR and read about "how much low down torque the new BOSS has........the endless top end power and almost neutral handling........the best GT ever !!!!!!!!!"................... Overall, the GTS may well be the better overall car...........fine..........but you are paying 20K more and the GTS has the advantage of the standard fitment stability control in WET test conditions that the article was written about.
__________________
Old RIDE 2006 BFGT Gone but not forgotten New RIDE 2018 AMG Mercedes A45 Angry AWD assassin
Last edited by Whitey-AMG; 06-06-2007 at 07:48 PM. |
|||
06-06-2007, 07:46 PM | #7 | ||
GT
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
|
theres also an article about a 6.2 litre chevy engine, which HSV may source, from uncle sam to differentiate there cars from holdens, i think they will do this, and yes i think the 5.4 will be gone/ and need overhauling then , no doubt.
|
||
06-06-2007, 07:50 PM | #8 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 308
|
6 Speed or not, the HSV have an awesome launch and can do sub 5 0-100km something no FPV comes close to
|
||
06-06-2007, 07:53 PM | #9 | |||
AWD Assassin
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,170
|
Quote:
SUB 5 seconds is dreaming............. More like 5 seconds + in the real world..........forget the marketing hype, it doesn't translate to reality.
__________________
Old RIDE 2006 BFGT Gone but not forgotten New RIDE 2018 AMG Mercedes A45 Angry AWD assassin
|
|||
06-06-2007, 07:56 PM | #10 | |||
GT
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
|
Quote:
it's contrasry to what we read in the mags though. by the way 14 seconds looks slow and sounds bad for a 6 litre v8. |
|||
06-06-2007, 07:58 PM | #11 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 308
|
I know they can do sub 5's because my friends 5.7 that does sub 5's is the same speed as his fathers maloo up to 250km
|
||
06-06-2007, 08:02 PM | #12 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: queensland
Posts: 1,147
|
Have you seen a gts? ugliest piece of plastic on the road, honestly the guy who designed that was on mushrooms or something.
|
||
06-06-2007, 08:02 PM | #13 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 308
|
ok, a 260kw XR8 is faster then a 307kw HSV that is why everyone is trading there **** XR8 in for a maloo
I have owned a XR8 and I have been in the new stuff, my Dirty old BA dosent come anywhere near close |
||
06-06-2007, 08:04 PM | #14 | |||
AWD Assassin
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,170
|
Quote:
OK........ We can't really argue the point here, because neither of us have real facts to back up our assumptions. Only thing I can say is that SUB 5 sec 0 - 100 will more than likely translate to 12 sec range 1/4 passes........ That I can categorically tell you is not the case...........we've seen ample examples at Calder to verify this. The 6 litre HSV is good, but not that good in standard tune...........sorry.
__________________
Old RIDE 2006 BFGT Gone but not forgotten New RIDE 2018 AMG Mercedes A45 Angry AWD assassin
|
|||
06-06-2007, 08:08 PM | #15 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 308
|
Well I never had to change my underwear in the BA, thats factual enough for me
|
||
06-06-2007, 08:10 PM | #16 | |||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,587
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
06-06-2007, 08:11 PM | #17 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 308
|
no, why ?
|
||
06-06-2007, 08:12 PM | #18 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: queensland
Posts: 1,147
|
I have never told anyone my car is fast, If you havent driven it for a while it feels fastish for a couple of hours and then its like humm, Ive lined up new ss's and beaten them no clubsports or gts's.....yet.
|
||
06-06-2007, 08:12 PM | #19 | |||
AWD Assassin
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,170
|
Quote:
Hmmmmmmmmmm I can just see it now........all of us showing each other our underwear and comparing their condition so we know which is the better / faster car.............. Your interpretation of fact and reason will no doubt leave the rest of us amused for a while to come. Thanks for the laugh.
__________________
Old RIDE 2006 BFGT Gone but not forgotten New RIDE 2018 AMG Mercedes A45 Angry AWD assassin
|
|||
06-06-2007, 08:12 PM | #20 | |||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,587
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
06-06-2007, 08:13 PM | #21 | |||
GT
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
|
Quote:
i was going to buy an xr8 260 . untill i drove a 290. big differance. uncomparable . sorry. in my opinion the 260 is a dog , untill modified . the 290 not so. |
|||
06-06-2007, 08:14 PM | #22 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 308
|
Also you can compare a car that has just driven off the shelf with one that is truely run in @ 50 000km
|
||
06-06-2007, 08:17 PM | #23 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: queensland
Posts: 1,147
|
Quote:
|
|||
06-06-2007, 08:17 PM | #24 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 308
|
Well 30kw and 20nm is a fair difference, thats like 2 exhausts 1 cold air induction and a extractor
a GT also revs higher with also increases its average power output |
||
06-06-2007, 08:19 PM | #25 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Not home often
Posts: 2,084
|
Quote:
I dont disgree too much with the comparo. I drive a manual VE R8 and its chasis is superior, handling feels much better. Straight line performance I felt was very similar, but I think and feel from rolling starts the Typhoon is much quicker than the VE, benefits from boost. I am also not a fan of the VE visability with the A pillar. The manual box in the Ford is ten times better than the Holden/HSV but the stock tyres on the Holden I felt more confident with. Ford brakes felt much better. BFYB the Typhoon still win hands down. However, I own a Typhoon, I am starting to feel its old. Time for edit............... :
__________________
1994 XR8 Sprint |
|||
06-06-2007, 08:21 PM | #26 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 109
|
Quote:
|
|||
06-06-2007, 08:23 PM | #27 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Not home often
Posts: 2,084
|
Quote:
__________________
1994 XR8 Sprint |
|||
06-06-2007, 08:27 PM | #28 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Not home often
Posts: 2,084
|
Quote:
I used to own a BA GT-P, and whether it was stock or modded, the car was making great power on an incline when it hits the limiter. I think the BOSS requires about 10-20 more kilowatts and an extra 500rpm. IMO, it will make the extra power if it could rev more.
__________________
1994 XR8 Sprint |
|||
06-06-2007, 08:28 PM | #29 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 308
|
Rolling starts where so so much fun against rice burners and skylines with the XR8, I used to get asked, "bbb b bb but...i drive a skyline...how could I loose ? what have you done to your car ?"
|
||
06-06-2007, 08:29 PM | #30 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: queensland
Posts: 1,147
|
Ive had plenty of illegal street drags with guys in xr8's, I win but it isn't by much a bonnet or two mabee, so I think there is **** all difference between 260 and 290.
|
||