Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-10-2018, 08:59 PM   #1
lamborghinifan
Regular Member
 
lamborghinifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: QLD
Posts: 392
Default Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

So after some second third or even fourth opinions on a little dilemma I have popping around my head. I'm tossing up buying a seven seater.

I currently own
-a beautiful wm2 caprice with the 6l. Performs flawlessly for family and touring duties. Lively enough and obviously comfortable and big enough.
- a fun zippy supercharged Mini Cooper s for school runs and relatively cheap town duties.

I'm toying with
- keeping the caprice which has been mechanically a1 and getting a boring diesel territory or xc90 diesel for local duties, but still pretty cheap to run.

Or

-keeping the mini for fun, and getting a big petrol v8 Audi Q7, or territory turbo Ghia To replace the caprice

Fuel isn't cheap enough to burn in a big daily, so it's mainly ok highway economy that matters for the long trips (by that I mean circa 10l-12L/100) in one of the big girls. Looking at approx 20k for a caprice replacement, 12k for a mini replacement.

The way I see it is
-Terri turbo ghia. Nice, powerful, thirsty. Not as many or as good creature comforts as the caprice. Average third row. Cheap repairs. (Owned non ghia previously)
- diesel Terri. Adequate but boring. Average 3rd row space, and boot behind 3rd row. Comparable running costs to sc mini. Cheap to repair. Titanium diesel likely out of price range, so basic equipment options only.
- diesel xc90. Good value, well equipped, reasonably economical, but repairs questionable. Great 3rd row and boot. Better features than later model ford. Is fwd/awd .
- Audi Q7. 4.2 petrol, nearly as quick at TTG. thirsty. Very good equipment. Good third row and boot. Great towing. Very risky for repairs.
-v8 xc90. Slowest v8 of them all. But good equipment. Questionable repairs.

For all this, I do count myself privelaged to have owned the caprice, possibly the pinnacle of Aus motoring, and already owned 4 big fords.

Give me some comments to chew on!
lamborghinifan is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2018, 05:39 AM   #2
happy1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,315
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

Hi,
I haven't driven Q7 and the Volvo, so this opinion is based on advertised prices and common sense, rather than detail experience with them.

The Q7 seems to cost almost double of a Territory Turbo petrol, but it seems you could have a Q7 diesel for about the same as a Q7 petrol.
These would be 10 years old now, with average km of 150.000 and upwards, so expect quite a few repairs both for the Audi and for the Ford.
I don't think it will be cheap ownership of either of these. For example replacing bushings in the suspension on the Territory Turbo, and transmission oil change etc will cost thousands. I am not familiar enough with the Audi to comment on service items on it, but expect parts to be more expensive.
Both 10 year old cars could have some oil leaks such as rear main seals on the engine, which are labor intensive to address.

This is a Ford forum, and the Territory Turbo is almost getting an Aussie classic with fewer left on the road now. The current price of petrol should give you a bargaining position to get one for less.

Have you test driven the Diesel Territory? It looks more modern than the SX/SY Territory, and the fuel economy is a lot better. Prices have fallen a lot on the SZ models, and you should find one for much less than same year Q7.
But the SZ isn't fault free either. If you drive mostly on the tarmac consider staying away from the 4x4 model, as the transfer cases have been trouble for many owners.
Cheers,
happy1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 23-10-2018, 09:10 AM   #3
Junkyard-Dog
*barks incessantly
 
Junkyard-Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: SA
Posts: 1,563
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

I don't really understand WHY you would get a different car. Seems like you already have a setup that works quite well for you. Personally I would have a WM Caprice over any soft-roader.
Junkyard-Dog is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 23-10-2018, 07:25 PM   #4
Sprintey
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Sprintey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Catland
Posts: 3,750
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

Quote:
Originally Posted by happy1 View Post
Hi,
For example replacing bushings in the suspension on the Territory Turbo, and transmission oil change etc will cost thousands.
Don't want to nitpick too much, but transmission oil change on ZF will cost hundreds rather than thousands. Thousands is for full replacement gearbox if it either dies or milkshakes. If you change the fluid regularly (we've done 3 times) you can get 300,000km out of it (in our case). Cheers - I'd go TTG but I'm biased. It's full time AWD by the way
__________________
I6 + AWD
Sprintey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-10-2018, 09:28 PM   #5
Swordie
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 461
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

I'd keep what you have. You will need to have money up your sleave for 2nd hand euro SUVs for repairs and servicing. The Caprice will handle better too.
Swordie is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2018, 02:27 PM   #6
lamborghinifan
Regular Member
 
lamborghinifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: QLD
Posts: 392
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

Thanks for the replies guys. I thought I'd been ignored!
I do like what I have, but, well, it's the seven seater that could potentially be on the horizon. If they only made a seven seater caprice! (It's called a merc gl500)
I mean, BMW is just releasing the x7, has The same wheelbase and length as the caprice, but about 150k more! Or they're all euros with dubious running costs.
I'm just mulling on it some more. Prob have a little while before I have to do anything.
lamborghinifan is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2018, 02:29 PM   #7
lamborghinifan
Regular Member
 
lamborghinifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: QLD
Posts: 392
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprintey View Post
Don't want to nitpick too much, but transmission oil change on ZF will cost hundreds rather than thousands. Thousands is for full replacement gearbox if it either dies or milkshakes. If you change the fluid regularly (we've done 3 times) you can get 300,000km out of it (in our case). Cheers - I'd go TTG but I'm biased. It's full time AWD by the way
Yes I've had this gearbox. There's more good ones than bad ones, but the drive ability of the box makes up for it I think. I'd have this in the caprice behind the v8 in a flash, it walks over the Holden box.
lamborghinifan is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2018, 02:56 PM   #8
Vesper Martini
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Vesper Martini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Victoria
Posts: 7,854
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

Quote:
Originally Posted by lamborghinifan View Post
I do like what I have, but, well, it's the seven seater that could potentially be on the horizon. If they only made a seven seater caprice! (It's called a merc gl500)
I mean, BMW is just releasing the x7, has The same wheelbase and length as the caprice, but about 150k more! Or they're all euros with dubious running costs.
Sorry but just because your Holden has a long wheelbase doesn't make it anything like a GL500 let alone the new X7.
Q7 is massive too

The Territory or an X5 if you want a v8 will have more internal space than the Holden & 7 seats you were looking for.
__________________
______________________________
2015 Territory Titanium RWD Diesel - SOLD
2016 BMW X5 xdrive 30D Msport
Seadoo Challenger 210SE 310HP
Vesper Martini is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2018, 06:23 PM   #9
arronm
BA/F6 BF/F6 SSV/R TTG
 
arronm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 7,251
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

Buy the territory. A tune up will give better economy and power, to smoke all the alternatives.
__________________
BA BF FPV starter button repairs. PM me.


Nizpro equipped and Tuned by the BEST in the west
Xtreme Ford Tuning

479RwKw Fuel limited, more pumps and power too come.

F6#0507 & #0639 Pro racer and Tech expert

NIZPRO modifying falcons like Premcar can only dream of , see VIDEO below.
https://youtu.be/oa4IfguGQ-A
arronm is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2018, 10:42 PM   #10
happy1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,315
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprintey View Post
Don't want to nitpick too much, but transmission oil change on ZF will cost hundreds rather than thousands.
Hi,
Apologies if I got misunderstood. I didn't mean the transmission service alone would be that expensive. When I said thousands it was to refurbish an average tired Territory with bushings and control arms in all corners, which clearly adds up a fair bit of $$.

Many of us do such work DIY at a lower cost of just the parts, but if you drop off the keys to Pedders or similar workshop and tell them 'fix everything that clunks or leaks' then it is pretty clear it would cost more than $ 999 in total.

Anyway, no doubt parts for an Audi is more. The VAG group is known for high parts prices. I don't know how well the Q7 is resisting wear in bushings etc. There has been horror stories about early failure of suspension parts on Audi A4, A6, and on VW Caravelle / Transporter, so clearly VAG products are not over-engineered like MB used to be in the past. Audi uses many liquid filled rubber bushings which are very expensive, so be careful, check some parts prices before deciding.

Cheers,
happy1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2018, 09:12 PM   #11
lamborghinifan
Regular Member
 
lamborghinifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: QLD
Posts: 392
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bevsta007 View Post
Sorry but just because your Holden has a long wheelbase doesn't make it anything like a GL500 let alone the new X7.
Q7 is massive too

The Territory or an X5 if you want a v8 will have more internal space than the Holden & 7 seats you were looking for.
No, the 2nd row rear space in a territory, or a q7, or an x5, or a land cruiser, is nothing comparable to the caprice. And the third row leaves a lot to be desired in the territory. In the caprice, there can be full car seats, with kids, and still easily walk across the front of them. In the territory, kids legs are on the front seats. Q7 is marginally better then the territory. But has a very good third row. And more room behind in the boot when the third row is up. Merc gl because of its length seems to be a bit better than all the above, but it's the only one I haven't been in. The x5s are pretty much comparable in most dimensions to the territory. Only advantage with them is the v8, but they're not much quicker than a turbo territory, for the ongoing costs...
reviews rate the q7 as a better drivers car than a land cruiser or merc gl. Which even from looking at the proportions makes sense.
lamborghinifan is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2018, 09:15 PM   #12
lamborghinifan
Regular Member
 
lamborghinifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: QLD
Posts: 392
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

Quote:
Originally Posted by arronm View Post
Buy the territory. A tune up will give better economy and power, to smoke all the alternatives.
Ah so tempting. And there's some half decent f6x around I've seen too.. nice two tone leather. But that fuel! I could never get my turbo territory below 13-14l/100 on a long trip at 110 or so.. and round town, well lets not talk about that.
lamborghinifan is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 25-10-2018, 09:17 PM   #13
lamborghinifan
Regular Member
 
lamborghinifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: QLD
Posts: 392
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

Quote:
Originally Posted by happy1 View Post
Hi,
Apologies if I got misunderstood. I didn't mean the transmission service alone would be that expensive. When I said thousands it was to refurbish an average tired Territory with bushings and control arms in all corners, which clearly adds up a fair bit of $$.

Many of us do such work DIY at a lower cost of just the parts, but if you drop off the keys to Pedders or similar workshop and tell them 'fix everything that clunks or leaks' then it is pretty clear it would cost more than $ 999 in total.

Anyway, no doubt parts for an Audi is more. The VAG group is known for high parts prices. I don't know how well the Q7 is resisting wear in bushings etc. There has been horror stories about early failure of suspension parts on Audi A4, A6, and on VW Caravelle / Transporter, so clearly VAG products are not over-engineered like MB used to be in the past. Audi uses many liquid filled rubber bushings which are very expensive, so be careful, check some parts prices before deciding.

Cheers,
This to me is prob one of the biggest plusses with the territory. Pretty much, they always need a bush done here and there, but overall still a pretty reliable rig, and everyone knows how to fix them. Better the devil I know sometimes. But they're not prone to huge expense hard diagnosis type problems.
lamborghinifan is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-10-2018, 09:23 PM   #14
Boosh Brus
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 436
Default Re: Turbo territory vs Audi Q7 vs Volvo XC90

I would go the Volvo XC90. They are reliable and parts are cheap from the US or Europe.
The Yamaha V8 is nice as well.
Boosh Brus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL