|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
25-05-2016, 07:55 PM | #1 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Nanny State
Posts: 772
|
I have a 2012 Zetec with the Ecoboost motor and the silver calcium battery has just died.Do I have to replace it with another silver calcium battery or can I replace it with a "normal" one?
__________________
He who dies with the most toys is still dead |
||
25-05-2016, 09:08 PM | #2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,696
|
Everyone on the net will tell you a normal battery is fine. However Ford recommends you stick with the silver calcium battery because that is what your charging system is optimised for. It will have a different charging strategy and the voltages will be a little different.
|
||
25-05-2016, 11:06 PM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 504
|
Here you go, make our own decision;
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...mondeo+battery http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...mondeo+battery http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...mondeo+battery Lets us know what you come up with. Be aware that Ford Parts do not sell a Silver Calcium and will just sell you the Motorcraft Calcium Battery...
__________________
2016 (MY17) Ford Mondeo Titanium EcoBoost (Moondust Silver)...more power please! |
||
This user likes this post: |
26-05-2016, 07:18 AM | #4 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 805
|
There's also a question of battery management system reset, 4 Ford dealers were evenly divided yes or no when I asked if it were reqired. One thing is for sure, the car logs the age of the battery in days, as you can see using Forscan.
Let us know how you go. |
||
26-05-2016, 12:15 PM | #5 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 805
|
Quote:
Ca/Ca battery makers like Century and Supercharge provide a cheaper alternative to the Ag/Ca battery originally fitted by Ford. They defend the use of their batteries by saying they are tolerent of higher charge voltages. The problem with that is the smart charge system relies in part on battery voltage to control the charging current and maintain the battery at a specified state of charge. It is not a question of tolerating. The data from a Ca/Ca battery will not match the original design parameters of the system, which also includes factors such battery type and temperature . . . The lack of detailed information from Ford about the smart charge system and possible consequences of fitting a battery not specified by Ford in the first place is what you're up against. Maybe the question is whether the difference in cost is worth the gain in efficiency? |
|||
26-05-2016, 04:24 PM | #6 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Nanny State
Posts: 772
|
My brain hurts.
__________________
He who dies with the most toys is still dead |
||
26-05-2016, 08:13 PM | #7 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 1,266
|
I bought a Century last year and it seems fine so far. The battery manufacturers seems to be moving away from silver/calcium batteries but Varta still make them.
__________________
MB Mondeo TDCi wagon, sea grey, on MAK Invidia 16" wheels. |
||
26-05-2016, 09:14 PM | #8 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 805
|
From memory Ford claims a reduction of about one percent in fuel consumption for their smart charge system. Ford Ranger owners can turn the system off and do so because it keeps the battery at 80% charged, which interferes with camping activities.
I recently changed my battery from a Supercheap to a BOND silver/calcium and immediately noticed fuel consumption drop from 6.4 to 6.0 l/100km. Unfortunately it coincided with winter and no AC, so no conclusion there. I'd say in practical terms you'd see between zero and 0.1l/100km difference between the batteries. Last edited by rondeo; 26-05-2016 at 09:15 PM. Reason: correction |
||
This user likes this post: |
27-05-2016, 10:00 PM | #9 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 569
|
I read the same on the internet. Decided it was all marketing for the blue oval to keep big dollar profits locked in. Even went so far as to determine OEM battery manufacturer.
Was a waste of my life I'll never get back The fact they claim a precious metal like silver makes a difference was enough in my mind to spend no more then $156 on a supercharge gold battery OEM battery lasted over 5 years. I'm 4 months into the new battery, no issues. 0.1% loss of fuel efficiency means I'm losing up to 10km per tank of diesel - the throttle position from my foot makes a bigger difference. But if you do buy the ford battery for $400, make sure you don't pay any less then $10 for your next tube of toothpaste while you're shopping |
||
28-05-2016, 08:37 PM | #10 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Dubbo, formerly Canberra
Posts: 342
|
Quote:
|
|||
29-05-2016, 02:00 AM | #11 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 1,266
|
Quote:
I'd be surprised if the improvement in fuel consumption is as much as 1%, especially at a steady speed.
__________________
MB Mondeo TDCi wagon, sea grey, on MAK Invidia 16" wheels. |
|||
29-05-2016, 08:30 AM | #12 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 569
|
Should clarify - $400 was for Tdci battery.
I would consider paying $207 knowing I could get another 5 years IF I was planning on keeping the car that long. The chemistry difference ? I apply the same logic when comparing the $2 toothpaste to the $10 toothpaste... Companies intentionally target different consumer segments based on how much they think they'll pay, i.e. might differentiate through 2-4 product "tiers" I'm resisting the temptation to debate how a battery can provide better spark, and more efficient combustion in a petrol motor - (unless the alternator has a clutch and free wheels for longer then a "regular" battery system). Did Ford buy the rights to the Brock Energy polariser ? You can have confidence in buying a "normal" Ca battery. - which is the intention of the original post. Last edited by 383hq; 29-05-2016 at 08:39 AM. |
||
29-05-2016, 09:14 AM | #13 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 805
|
The smart charge system reduces fuel consumption by controlling the alternator output. This is done by electronically allowing the alternator to wholly or partly 'free wheel'.
|
||
This user likes this post: |
30-05-2016, 06:28 PM | #14 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 119
|
After 6 years, my MB diesel had its first starting problems this morning.
Bit the bullet, and booked in to have a new one installed at the local Ford dealer tomorrow. $240 fitted, could probably get cheaper elsewhere but they had one in stock, and hopefully know what they are doing! I guess 6 years is not too bad for a battery, and not interested in trying to stretch it out any further. |
||
30-05-2016, 07:27 PM | #15 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 805
|
Quote:
Standard battery should be fine, some different opinions about possible small effect on economy is all. It would be interesting to hear what the service people have to say about the battery management system reset, ie: is it available, if so was it done. Maybe you could ask? |
|||
30-05-2016, 11:26 PM | #16 | ||
Starter Motor
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 28
|
If the Mondeo is anything like the current Focus, its worth getting the dealer to do it.
Me and my brother bought a battery from Ford spare parts and couldn't wait half a day for them to install it, so we did it ourselves. Long story short, after replacing the battery, the car threw out a transmission error so we had to bring the car back to the dealer. Talked to the service guys and they said the car needs to be notified when a new battery is installed to reset that special charging thing Ford has going on otherwise the car will throw errors. |
||
31-05-2016, 07:57 AM | #17 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 1,266
|
Quote:
Even the Ford dealers can't agree on the need for the battery reset - I didn't bother and had no problems.
__________________
MB Mondeo TDCi wagon, sea grey, on MAK Invidia 16" wheels. |
|||
31-05-2016, 09:23 PM | #18 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 569
|
Quote:
Re: fuel consumption, (predominantly a function of throttle position) Sure, save yourself 1/3rd of a horsepower in parasitic drag by complementing the charging system with a Ag Ca battery. My foot moves more then that potential saving- headwinds, gradients, overtaking. But to spend big dollars over cheaper alternatives, one must convince oneself that the extra money is well worth it. This I understand. |
|||