Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2013, 12:04 AM   #1
Moby Vic
Cynical Idealist
 
Moby Vic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
Default Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

I had this same idea:
http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2013/0...tang-boss-351/

Excerpt:
Quote:
5. Heritage.
The S197 platform is retro by nature, and Ford loves calling on the Mustang’s storied past. This was never more true with the Boss 302. Ford repeated history in more ways than one, building the Boss 302 for only two years and following the styling cues of both the 1969 and 1970 models. Just like decades ago, Ford built a racing version (two actually) and won a championship. And what did Ford do the following year back in 1971? They built a Boss 351. Yes, the car isn’t as famous, beautiful or as desirable as the Boss 302, but that doesn’t necessarily matter. If Ford wanted to truly follow the Mustangs history and continue the Boss name, they could have gone to the 351 and done a single year production run just like they did in 1971.
4. A ready-to-go powertrain.
Assuming Ford did want to build a Mustang Boss 351, then what engine would they use? The answer is relatively simple. The current Shelby GT500′s 5.8-liter V8 measures out at 354.6 cubic inches of displacement. To us, that’s close enough, and we’re sure Ford could get the V8 down to 351cid if they wanted to. Converted to a high-revving naturally aspirated setup, the engine could easily produce north of 500 horsepower and 450 lb-ft torque.
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with!
Moby Vic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 10-04-2013, 12:55 PM   #2
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

I'd be curious if a 5.8 NA was any more effective than the current 5L NA though. More torque, quite likely, but im not sure if its power delivery and track manners would be better.
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2013, 02:49 PM   #3
Bent8
Long live the GT !
 
Bent8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 1,863
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

I'm sure a BOSS 351 GT would be a huge hit!

If the current 5.0 n/a motor makes 420hp in the Mustang GT, the 5.8 would be making over 475hp with a 7000rpm redline.

And imagine the noise it would make!
__________________
2018 Ford Mustang GT - Oxford White | Auto | Herrod Tune | K&N Filter | StreetFighter Oil Separators | H&R Springs | Whiteline Vertical Links | Ceramic Protection | Tint

"Whatya think of me car, XR Falcon, 351 Blown Cleveland running Motec injection and runnin' on methanol... goes pretty hard too, got heaps of torque for chucking burnouts, IT'S UNREAL !!" - Poida
Bent8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2013, 03:21 PM   #4
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

It's not that simple though. The 5.8 is based on the 5.4, effectively making it a first generation modular. The 5.0 is next gen, has VCT available on all 4 cams and other goodies.
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2013, 04:48 PM   #5
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

I wish they would just do us all a favour and start making a 5.8 Coyote, to sell alongside the 5.0.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 10-04-2013, 05:05 PM   #6
tweeked
N/A all the way
 
tweeked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,459
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

Do it !!!!
__________________
BA GT
5.88 litres of Modular Boss Powered Muscle
300++ RWKW N/A on 98 octane on any dyno, happy or sad, on any day, with any operator you choose - 12.39@115.5 full weight

tweeked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2013, 05:17 PM   #7
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8 View Post
I wish they would just do us all a favour and start making a 5.8 Coyote, to sell alongside the 5.0.
Probably too much overlap with 6.2 BOSS.

A different time maybe they would've done a tall deck Coyote instead of BOSS, but I suspect its roots from the Hurricane project date earlier than Coyote and Ford all but admitted they felt they were vulnerable to GM and Chrysler based on capacity of their F series V8's.
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2013, 05:44 PM   #8
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

Wait, Ford should put effort and money into removing the supercharger a superseded engine (designed in its form to be blown anyway), in a soon to be superseded model...just to have a badge name?

I'd rather see ford put their effort into the 50th anniversary mustangs, and some exotic killing 2015 mustangs!
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2013, 08:47 PM   #9
Crazy Dazz
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, Northern Suburbs
Posts: 5,011
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked View Post
Wait, Ford should put effort and money into removing the supercharger a superseded engine (designed in its form to be blown anyway), in a soon to be superseded model...just to have a badge name?

I'd rather see ford put their effort into the 50th anniversary mustangs, and some exotic killing 2015 mustangs!
maybe they could destroke the 4.0l to 3.5l
and fit ecoboost
__________________
2024
Making Whine from the Tears of Hippies
Crazy Dazz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2013, 11:32 AM   #10
paulb351
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 418
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FPV GTHO View Post
It's not that simple though. The 5.8 is based on the 5.4, effectively making it a first generation modular. The 5.0 is next gen, has VCT available on all 4 cams and other goodies.
I thought falcon gt with 5.0 didn't have all cams managed with VCT (ie one set only) as the PCM in the falcon didn't have the capacity and hence the Miami starting lower power output than coyote before the supercharger.
paulb351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2013, 12:51 PM   #11
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

That's correct but that's in Falcon. Mustang has a different ECU and both 3.7 V6 and 5.0 V8 have VCT phasers on all cams. 5.4 only ever has VCT available in the 3V models.
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2013, 01:36 PM   #12
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

I was just thinking the other day it would be cool if Ford did a 429 to go up against the Camaro 427. Dodge should up the SRT8 Challenger to a 426 Hemi. Then it would be just like the good old days!
Seriously though, I am hoping the next gen Mustang will offer a 5.0 V8 EcoBoost and 3.5 V6 EcoBoost in addition to the 4cyl EcoBoost. That would put Ford in the same league as Mercedes.
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 11-04-2013, 02:40 PM   #13
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

They've got the 777 motor they could dust off, but being a BOSS motor, which is larger and heavier than 5.4/5.8, it would be a bit big block vs small block.
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2013, 08:15 PM   #14
Falco GT51
Blue Blood
 
Falco GT51's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Out West
Posts: 210
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

How hard would it be to for Ford to change the 5l Coyote to a 5.8? Is is as easy as changing the crank and rods?
__________________
2005 BA GT Mll #0697.
1979 XD 5.8 X Pursuit
2015 FGX XR8

Powered by FORD
Falco GT51 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2013, 08:54 PM   #15
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

I think the largest capacity aftermarket kits are only 5.3l so they would need to increase the deck height to where the 5.4 was to get more stroke.
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-04-2013, 02:58 AM   #16
Moby Vic
Cynical Idealist
 
Moby Vic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falco GT51 View Post
How hard would it be to for Ford to change the 5l Coyote to a 5.8? Is is as easy as changing the crank and rods?
From what I've read about the Coyote, there's no room for increasing displacement either through boring or stroking. The piston skirts are already scalloped to clear crankshaft weights.

But Saleen seems to have found a way to increase displacement (this was announced months ago):
http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...NEWS/121209896

Excerpt:
Quote:
So what's new? First up is a Saleen 351 Mustang, which was announced at the LA auto show last week. While Saleen and various entities—authorized and not—have produced the 302 Mustang for many years, this is the first time in 13 years that a 351 will come out with one of those big SALEEN windshield header stickers on it. The Mustang maker promises 700 hp and 655 lb-ft of torque from the 351-cubic-inch V8, which sounds entirely doable when it's paired with the Saleen 296 supercharger system.
“Everything about this project has been mindful of the goal to create the most potent Mustang on the market”, said Al Wagner, vp of engineering. “I think we have certainly pushed the bar in the production Mustang segment with our 351 offering. Once the project came together I couldn't help but think; if the 302 Mustang is using a Coyote engine, the 351 is definitely the gray wolf of the class.”
The S351 will also use a Saleen clutch in the Mustang's six-speed manual, a 3.73:1 final drive, Saleen wheels, tires, 15-inch brakes and a Saleen S4 suspension. Look for S351 Mustangs in January.
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with!
Moby Vic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 12-04-2013, 06:53 AM   #17
FGII-XR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FGII-XR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salamander Bay
Posts: 5,427
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

the Coyote has been proven in the police special to be capable of 406 RWKW with nothing more than an exhaust and a tune that's around 500 FWKW . so with just a tune a GT 351 (KW) is quite achievable. why would any sane person suggest that a struggling ford Australia invest many millions of dollars in developing another performance engine when we have a massively under tuned one already with plenty of potential.
It seems to me some people can never be satisfied, we have available a package that makes the red side look quite sad with plenty of scope to be modified to develop more power than most of you can handle . I just don't get it
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Everyone starts off with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the experience bag before the luck bag is empty.

"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt."

Start a new career as a bus driver

Rides:
FG2 XR6 stock at this stage but a very nice ride

xc 4 DOOR X CHASER 5.8 UNDER RESTO
FGII-XR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-04-2013, 07:27 AM   #18
2011G6E
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
2011G6E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

I'm sure the ten or so specials they would sell a year would more than make up for the development dollars...

Times are moving on...I love V8's...I've got one in our old Kingswood ute...but the future isn't bigger and bigger V8's. The development dollars could be far better spent on other areas like handling, turbo sixes (and, *gasp*, fours), and better chassis dynamics to deal with a real world of increasingly strict and comprehensive restrictions, where a car with a sweet chassis and good handling will sell like hot cakes...not necessarily the most powerful car or one with the biggest cylinder count, but the one that's fun to drive within the limits that were are being hammered with everywhere.


Now taking votes for least favourite comment in history...
2011G6E is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 12-04-2013, 12:39 PM   #19
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default Re: Why Ford should Build a New Boss 351

Quote:
Originally Posted by au3xr6 View Post
the Coyote has been proven in the police special to be capable of 406 RWKW with nothing more than an exhaust and a tune that's around 500 FWKW . so with just a tune a GT 351 (KW) is quite achievable. why would any sane person suggest that a struggling ford Australia invest many millions of dollars in developing another performance engine when we have a massively under tuned one already with plenty of potential.
It seems to me some people can never be satisfied, we have available a package that makes the red side look quite sad with plenty of scope to be modified to develop more power than most of you can handle . I just don't get it
Re-read EVERYTHING that has been posted so far, this has nothing to do with Falcon.
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL