|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
26-10-2007, 04:56 PM | #1 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,699
|
I've never driven a 351 but keep hearing lots about them.
Are they more powerful than my ED inline 6 or the BA's 6? What about fords current V8? I don't understand it really everyone goes on about the 351 but it's a 30 year old engine. Surely technology would give the New 8's the advantage???
__________________
EB II 1992 Fairmont - koni reds, wade 977b, 2.5inch/4480's and much more to come! |
||
26-10-2007, 05:01 PM | #2 | |||
○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ ○○○○○
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,954
|
Quote:
I don't know the exact HP figures of a stock clevo 351, boss 260 ed I6. Someone will fill us in i am sure. |
|||
26-10-2007, 05:02 PM | #3 | ||
Its Resonating!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 1,612
|
30 years of research & development
but yeah, id say it would be even??? |
||
26-10-2007, 05:03 PM | #4 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In A House
Posts: 2,467
|
My Mates and the Ex Inlaws 351's were basically great tuned 351's and ran like Monsters
a good tuned 351 will eat I6's in the E series range(stock to stock tuned) makes me wanna go and buy another now |
||
26-10-2007, 05:03 PM | #5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 575
|
351s are really fast. like fast as the wind.
an engine is just an air pump. technology does them more harm than good. look at top fuel engines. no vtec there |
||
26-10-2007, 05:04 PM | #6 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In A House
Posts: 2,467
|
Quote:
so much for technology |
|||
26-10-2007, 05:18 PM | #7 | ||
1999 Ford Fairmont Ghia
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,162
|
At it's peak under the nose of the XY GTHO phase 3 the Cleveland 351 put out an estimated 294 kilowatts.
The current peak for the Modular BOSS is 302 kilowatts. The peak reached by the SOHC 250 crossflow found in the ED reached 172 kilowatts in the AU XR6. The DOHC six found in the BA/BF has hit a peak of 190kw naturally aspirated and 270kw turbocharged. Even though it's the oldest I am under the impression that the best engine out of the 250 crossflow, BOSS and Cleveland is in fact the Cleveland 351..why??? The Cleveland is a oversquare design which encourages high rpm. I think engine builders have seen upwards of 400kw naturally aspirated in the Cleveland 351. I'm sure the Cleveland guys have much better knowledge but the Cleveland 351 is in fact a new engine in relative terms. The BOSS 302 Mustang was used as a development fuel for the design of the excellent heads on the Cleveland and it was until the end of the muscle car era that the Cleveland was put into production which is a shame because the Cleveland had the potential to dominate the muscle car scene (which it did in Australia). While not as powerful as the FE big blocks the big blocks were too heavy and inefficient for circuit racing and the Windsor small block was an outdated and restricted design by the late 60's. For circuit racing the Cleveland was THE BEST engineavailable (though I think they had oiling problems). Though many would dispute it there hasn't been a V8 to match the Cleveland since. The Windsor had shocking head flow and the Modular V8 is an overweight monstrosity with a design limiting it's ability to rev and be bored and stroked. GM and Dodge took the path of in fact modernising their pushrod V8's from the 70's such a shame that we didn't get a modern Cleveland. Don't be fooled by it's age remember man landed on the moon when the Clevo was released and that fest hasn't been matched since. |
||
26-10-2007, 05:51 PM | #8 | |||
Can't go around corners
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Radelaide
Posts: 639
|
I always thought the 390 in the galaxies and other american fords had more power, certianly feels like it.
__________________
Quote from Jeremy Clarkson in the Top Gear Vietnam special: Quote:
|
|||
26-10-2007, 05:58 PM | #9 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 83
|
i wish they would bring back the 531 please,please,please
|
||
26-10-2007, 06:01 PM | #10 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,699
|
Ah so stock the boss is better and when modded the 351 can handle way more?
Also I thought fuel injection gave more power than a carburettor setup?
__________________
EB II 1992 Fairmont - koni reds, wade 977b, 2.5inch/4480's and much more to come! |
||
26-10-2007, 06:06 PM | #11 | |||
Weezland
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney,workshop mod
Posts: 7,216
|
Quote:
|
|||
26-10-2007, 06:09 PM | #12 | |||
Afterburner + skids =
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Skidsville
Posts: 12,136
|
Quote:
I'm a bit concerned as to why we are comparing a 250 crossflow to a 351 Cleveland......................
__________________
Speed Kills. So buy an AU XR8 and live forever. Oo\===/oO |
|||
26-10-2007, 06:12 PM | #13 | |||
MIGHTY MAGPIES 2010
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: yarram se vic in the shed listening to pinkfloyd and rubbing panels
Posts: 3,081
|
Quote:
|
|||
26-10-2007, 06:13 PM | #14 | |||
Weezland
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney,workshop mod
Posts: 7,216
|
Quote:
|
|||
26-10-2007, 06:14 PM | #15 | |||
MIGHTY MAGPIES 2010
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: yarram se vic in the shed listening to pinkfloyd and rubbing panels
Posts: 3,081
|
Quote:
|
|||
26-10-2007, 06:19 PM | #16 | |||
Weezland
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney,workshop mod
Posts: 7,216
|
Quote:
|
|||
26-10-2007, 06:19 PM | #17 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
__________________
Who cares how it looks, power is everything. Looks are for metrosexuals..... |
|||
26-10-2007, 06:25 PM | #18 | |||
MIGHTY MAGPIES 2010
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: yarram se vic in the shed listening to pinkfloyd and rubbing panels
Posts: 3,081
|
Quote:
|
|||
26-10-2007, 06:27 PM | #19 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,301
|
I've driven heaps of Cleveland powered cars and even the 4 barrelled 302 clevelands were dogs compared to a stock 2 barrel 351. I remember how well even the smog restricted XD 5.8 went.
That 4 inch bore and 3 1/2 inch stoke plus the semi hemi heads with them huuuuuugggggeeee valves (2V valves were bigger that Chev fuelly valves stock!) just seem to make power right across the rev range. May be the crank to deck height was "just" right where in the 302 clevo is so wrong... It was designed as a performance engine and that really shows. Just dragged out my old copy of Ford Performance Engines by Bob Ganahl (ISBN 0-931472-05-9), he loved them. Long live the 351 Cleveland as one of the great ford engines ever. |
||
26-10-2007, 06:27 PM | #20 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,568
|
Quote:
|
|||
26-10-2007, 06:31 PM | #21 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
|
no big horsepower is still carbed
|
||
26-10-2007, 06:33 PM | #22 | |||
MIGHTY MAGPIES 2010
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: yarram se vic in the shed listening to pinkfloyd and rubbing panels
Posts: 3,081
|
Quote:
|
|||
26-10-2007, 06:33 PM | #23 | |||
Weezland
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney,workshop mod
Posts: 7,216
|
Quote:
Do you have any proof? We are talking EFI here,not a mechanical injection hat... |
|||
26-10-2007, 06:38 PM | #24 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Is that your face, or did you neck throw up
Posts: 3,041
|
Quote:
Fact |
|||
26-10-2007, 06:40 PM | #25 | ||
XF 393 3v CHI heads
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,437
|
EFI is for saving trees and little jap cars, i would only use efi if it was an 8 individual throttle body cross trumpet design...mmmmmm supercars, but when it comes to the KISS method, you cant fault a carb, at the end of the day ALL electrics f**ck up, keep it all mechanical baby!
__________________
XF Falcon, 393 Clevo. 11.01@123mph "RAZNREVNU" |
||
26-10-2007, 06:42 PM | #26 | |||
XF 393 3v CHI heads
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,437
|
Quote:
__________________
XF Falcon, 393 Clevo. 11.01@123mph "RAZNREVNU" |
|||
26-10-2007, 06:43 PM | #27 | ||
LOW AND SLOW
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Geelong.
Posts: 2,644
|
351 is all about the sound of its power, not how much power it has. Its like watching the television, the pictures are better on the wireless !!! :
|
||
26-10-2007, 06:43 PM | #28 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
After just changing the engine on a EF, I will never ever own/work on one again.
__________________
Who cares how it looks, power is everything. Looks are for metrosexuals..... |
|||
26-10-2007, 06:43 PM | #29 | |||
rocknrolla
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 1,589
|
Quote:
__________________
1979 P6 LTD 383c
1970 ZC Fairlane 500 351w 1964 XM Falcon Deluxe 200ci |
|||
26-10-2007, 06:49 PM | #30 | |||
Donating Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: QLD
Posts: 11,836
|
Quote:
Easy to do mate and they do make power : |
|||