Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17-03-2018, 05:01 PM   #1
Vortex-98
Regular Member
 
Vortex-98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 205
Default Exhaust size velocity vs volume

I'm trying to get the exhaust sounding a bit better ,I'm getting sum new headers but when it comes to size it gets a balancing act ,the smaller diameter exhaust pipes better for velocity an moving the air faster than a bigger diameter which is more for volume r but as it has 2 pipes on the inlet the noise they make isnt pulsing in harmony an they cancel the flow of the other making for a stock idle..
__________________
[B]WTB (Syd)...AU 5.0 or xr8 4 speed auto transmission in good working cond /B]

Last edited by Vortex-98; 17-03-2018 at 05:10 PM.
Vortex-98 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-03-2018, 09:06 PM   #2
T3rminator
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
T3rminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,931
Default Re: Exhaust size velocity vs volume

Do you have a big merge pipe in your current system? If you do, remove it or make the merge section much smaller.

I've never heard a bad sounding AU V8.
T3rminator is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-03-2018, 12:29 AM   #3
NCII40
XR6T BA 2002
 
NCII40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 683
Default Re: Exhaust size velocity vs volume

Manta Cat back
High Flow Cats recommended
H pipe already on the kit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RipCZpvv_ag

https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/MANTA-PE...-/172378990840
__________________
XR6T 2002 BA
NCII40 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-03-2018, 01:03 PM   #4
Vortex-98
Regular Member
 
Vortex-98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 205
Default Re: Exhaust size velocity vs volume

Tickford 4 into1 extractor an cats into 3 or 3.5 mandrel into centre muffler an then 3in resonator...I'm thinking of fitting a twin system from Cats back,after I get my extractors fitted...can extractors stock xr8 or paceys be fitted an removed easily or do I have to take it to a shop to get it up on a hoist
__________________
[B]WTB (Syd)...AU 5.0 or xr8 4 speed auto transmission in good working cond /B]
Vortex-98 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-03-2018, 02:26 PM   #5
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default Re: Exhaust size velocity vs volume

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vortex-98 View Post
Tickford 4 into1 extractor an cats into 3 or 3.5 mandrel into centre muffler an then 3in resonator...I'm thinking of fitting a twin system from Cats back,after I get my extractors fitted...can extractors stock xr8 or paceys be fitted an removed easily or do I have to take it to a shop to get it up on a hoist
A single 3 inch is actually smaller than the factory twin 2 inch.

Go twin 2.25.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-03-2018, 05:06 PM   #6
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default Re: Exhaust size velocity vs volume

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8 View Post
A single 3 inch is actually smaller than the factory twin 2 inch.

Go twin 2.25.
No it isn't.
A 3" single has about 12% more area than twin 2".
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 27-03-2018, 02:17 PM   #7
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default Re: Exhaust size velocity vs volume

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sox View Post
No it isn't.
A 3" single has about 12% more area than twin 2".
But not as much as twin 2.25, which is what he should use.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-03-2018, 03:59 PM   #8
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default Re: Exhaust size velocity vs volume

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8 View Post
But not as much as twin 2.25, which is what he should use.
Depends what he's chasing.
As I understand his engine is very mild, so a single 3" is probably better than dual 2.25".
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL