Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2010, 08:44 AM   #1
burnz
VFII SS UTE
 
burnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 6,353
Default Hackers Wirelessly Crash Car's Computer At Highway Speeds

Quote:

A team of university researchers has been able to hack into a car's warning systems via wireless sensors, sending fake tire pressure messages at highway speeds and eventually frying an onboard computer. The dawn of the carhacker approaches.

We've told you before about experiments to hack into the increasingly complicated programming in modern vehicles. How complicated? A typical luxury sedan will carry three miles of wiring, scores of processors and close to 100 million lines of software code, or roughly 20 times more than used in a F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

Those previous experiments showed what could be done with a physical connection to a vehicle's computer. The new work by teams from the University of South Carolina and Rutgers tried a different tack: spoofing the wireless sensors in wheels used by tire pressure monitoring systems, required in all new U.S. vehicles since 2008.

The researchers didn't find a wide-open door so much as the security employed by a 1920s speakeasy: once they learned the secret knock, the unidentified test car's controls let them in no questions asked. The team sent fake warning messages from 40 meters away, and in another experiment, got the test car to flash a warning that a tire had lost all pressure while beaming the signal from another car as both drove 68 mph.

Because each sensor uses a unique ID tag, it was also possible to track specific vehicles, in a way that would be far less noticeable than roadside cameras.

The hacked car usually reset its warnings after the spoofed messages stopped. But after two days of tests, the electronic control unit for the tire monitors fell off its twig and had to be replaced by a dealer. The researchers note that it took several hours of graduate-level engineering to devise their tools and crack into the monitors, but that the actual technology for doing so cost about $1,500.

The teams suggest some basic software rules could provide at least a lookout for the speakeasy door. it's not the auto equivalent of the Conficker worm, but such experiments suggest the tools for an actual hack may exist. Thankfully, many Americans already have a strong defense of ignorance: Nearly half apparently don't understand what a tire pressure warning light looks like, and a third don't even know such systems exist.
http://jalopnik.com/5610373/hackers-...ce=twitterfeed

__________________
I don't often hear the sound of a screaming LSX.
But when I do, So do the neighbours..
GO SOUTHS
burnz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2010, 08:47 AM   #2
Fled74
The Thread Killa
 
Fled74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,064
Default

"Possible to track specific vehicles"? This does not bode well.
__________________



"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
Fled74 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2010, 09:35 AM   #3
MO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: QLD
Posts: 4,446
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fled74
"Possible to track specific vehicles"? This does not bode well.
Another good reason to keep the classics alive.......no computer to worry about.
__________________
FORD RULES OK

The more I know ppl the more I love my DOGS.
2011 SY Territory Limited Edition TS
2000 AUII SE ute IL6
MO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2010, 10:28 AM   #4
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default

I can just picture someone with malicious intent overrunning a car's electronic driving aids to cause a crash.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2010, 10:28 AM   #5
Boosh Brus
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MO
Another good reason to keep the classics alive.......no computer to worry about.
But then you need to get out and look at your tires... who has the time for that?
Boosh Brus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2010, 12:34 PM   #6
billy302
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Perth
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burnz
Guys this is a load of old rubbish and don't listen to the crap.
Firstly the computer is a solid state unit with no wireless capability.
The only thing wireless in any car is the blue tooth phone system. This is not repeat not integrated into the engine management system
billy302 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2010, 12:52 PM   #7
StrokedXT
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billy302
Guys this is a load of old rubbish and don't listen to the crap.
Firstly the computer is a solid state unit with no wireless capability.
The only thing wireless in any car is the blue tooth phone system. This is not repeat not integrated into the engine management system
Not exactly, the article says they hacked the tyre pressure monitoring system that is obviously wireless, but you are correct there is no threat of hacking the cars ecu wirelessly and taking it down and killing all the occupants.
StrokedXT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2010, 01:02 PM   #8
OzJavelin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OzJavelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrokedXT
Not exactly, the article says they hacked the tyre pressure monitoring system that is obviously wireless, but you are correct there is no threat of hacking the cars ecu wirelessly and taking it down and killing all the occupants.
So .. there is an airgap between the tyre monitoring all other more critical computer systems?

Malicious Dynamic Stability Control over-ride would be an interesting exercise.
OzJavelin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2010, 02:42 PM   #9
Phyber
BF= Backend's Farked
 
Phyber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 681
Default

Wireless in my car - do not want. I work in IT and if you can connect to it (wirelessly or otherwise), you can get into it seems to be the inevitable way of the world. Viruses even exist in still pictures and music files!

Scary.
__________________

-------------------------------------------
BFII XR6T - ZF box
Racewars 2017 result - 800m @ 229km/h - 1000m @ 241km/h
PB: 317rwkw - 11.94 @ 120mph - 2.093 60'
PB: Stock/208rwkw - 13.594 @ 105mph - 2.297 60'
-------------------------------------------
Phyber is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2010, 06:11 PM   #10
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,549
Default

You could probably do it with Honda's, but ONLY if they had the wireless modual connected.

Then you'd die of old age because of its 512kbps bandwidth between moduals.
Franco Cozzo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-08-2010, 02:22 AM   #11
gemini
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 38
Default

How ever did we manage without wireless tyre pressure monitoring.
gemini is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-08-2010, 08:25 AM   #12
Luke Plaizier
Lukeyson
Donating Member1
 
Luke Plaizier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW
Posts: 2,584
Default

There was another article where this was done with a wireless device plugged into the OBD2 port. So you do need physical access to the vehicle before it hits the road for the really bad stuff.

This is definitely possible on the BA or BF which have the one CAN bus with all modules accessible directly via the OBD2 port. Interestingly, in the FG, the PCM / Gearbox / ABS messages are now carried on a CAN bus that isn't presented to the OBD2 port any more. And the security system is on a LIN bus not shown to the OBD2 port either. However many speedo, envrionmental and audio messages are still visible on OBD2.

And Chrysler are known to now have a firewall between the OBD2 port and the rest of the bus, so you don't see broadcast messages, and can't issue them, and like any internet style firewall, you are only allow to issue certain commands or you'll be blocked.

Next thing you know we'll have to apply virus pattern updates to our cars on a daily basis.

The big worry is with those cars like Tesla that 'phone to base' on a regular basis and report ECU diagnostics. When you go in for a service, they already know what is wrong. The path from ECU to home base had want to be pretty damn secure.


Lukeyson
__________________
If the human brain was simple enough to understand, we'd be too simple to understand it.
Luke Plaizier is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-08-2010, 08:36 AM   #13
MO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: QLD
Posts: 4,446
Default

And from 'phone to base' ecu diagnostic how long before the locals are plugged in and send you your fine in the mail without ever pulling you over?
__________________
FORD RULES OK

The more I know ppl the more I love my DOGS.
2011 SY Territory Limited Edition TS
2000 AUII SE ute IL6
MO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-08-2010, 07:04 PM   #14
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/11/c...essire-monito/

Quote:
Cars hacked by researchers through wireless tire pressire monitors

by Sam Abuelsamid (RSS feed) on Aug 11th 2010 at 7:30PM

We heard the first reports of researchers proving that you could hack into automotive electronic systems earlier this year. That work was based on tapping into the OBD-II port normally used by mechanics for reading diagnostic codes. That method of car hacking, however, is of limited value to cyber criminals because it requires having physical access to the underside of a car's dashboard.

Another group of researchers from Rutgers University and the University of South Carolina have just discovered that you can hack into a car's electronics wirelessly, which means any modern vehicle could be vulnerable to an attack at any time, even while it's being driven down the road.

The researchers used a car's tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) as their entry portal. Tire pressure monitoring has been mandatory on new cars since 2008 and uses a sensor on each wheel that transmits data over radio frequencies to a vehicle's electronic control unit.

By sniffing for signals from the TPMS, these researchers were able to track two different vehicles and even interfere with the signals. At this point, the real world implications are limited because TPMS sensors have a very short range and update the car's ECU only every 60-90 seconds. However, these findings underscore how as vehicles get more wireless connectivity, it's important to ensure those wireless connections are secure and encrypted to prevent mischief.

[Source: Ars Technica | Image: TRW]
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL