Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-12-2010, 10:39 PM   #1
JG34JA
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 487
Default Australian 'Cruiser, power by Ford

It has always been puzzling that the Land Rover, and then LandCruiser dominated this country in rural areas and the bush and no Australian competitor emerged to even challenge them. After all, they are utilitarian, built tough, unsophisticated and reliable - all monikers that have been used on Australian passenger cars.

So why has no one connected the dots, and produced a mass produced Australian 4x4 ute/wagon with real "bushability"? And I don't mean soft roader.

Is it business case? Could it supplement a current business case? Is it crash safety regulations that demand Aussie produced cars be one level and allow imports to be less safe? Consumer tastes denying the ROI? Is the competition too strong? Has the ship sailed, long ago?

As an example, we could take the 4.0 inline six in petrol and gas, the 2.7TD, 6 speed auto and 6 speed manual and marry these combos to transfer case, two live axles (or one with a front IFS), part or full time 4wd, a full chassis and simple body work. We could build it simply, and build it tough to last. The suspension could be made supple, the angles of approach, departure and ramp-over could be competitive, diff lockers could be used, and Australians can certainly engineer for both safety and tune the vehicles to this country better than anyone else.

Love to hear thoughts on why there never was/will be (?) an Aussie made "Cruiser" on this continent, or why there should be!

JG34JA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 10:41 PM   #2
f1tzy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
f1tzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: brisbane
Posts: 509
Default

Most people who buy cruisers or patrols would never buy anything else purely due to the branding
f1tzy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-12-2010, 12:57 AM   #3
Ohio XB
Compulsive Hobbiest
 
Ohio XB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f1tzy
Most people who buy cruisers or patrols would never buy anything else purely due to the branding

Toyota learned this lesson the hard way in the US. They built a brand new plant in Texas to build the full-sized Tundra pick-up truck to compete with the F-150, Chevy Silverado, and Dodge Ram. The plant has a 200,000 unit capacity and Toyota also transformed half of another plant to be able to build an additional 100,000 units per year. What they underestimated was "brand loyalty."

Whether a Ford, Chevy, or Dodge truck owner, they are very loyal to their brands. It's why they have owned several of that truck brand's vehicles. It fits them, has got them through what they have needed from the truck, and represent dependability and experience.

Though Toyota, at the time, had the reputation of building the highest quality cars they were not thought of as "truck masters." They were decades behind the Big3 in full sized truck experience.

As a result, Toyota barely sells enough Tundras to keep the half of a plant that they converted to build the Tundra running, without regard to the new plant needing to build any at all. For 2010, Toyota has sold 83,296 Tundras through November. They will not sell 100,000 this year. Compare that to the F-series truck from Ford with year to date sales of 473,461 trucks.

Toyota vastly underestimated the loyalty of truck owners. Couple that with the short comings of their truck (excessive frame flex, tailgate weakness, etc.) and they only fill a niche for those who feel a Toyota represents the best in quality and the truck they use is not used too harshly. It's kind of a status symbol for them.

Note this: In the commercials Toyota was running a couple years ago, showing their truck executing all kinds of dramatic demonstrations on elaborately built sets (teeter, incline, etc.) all of the mechanisms were built by contractors which were still on site, and all of the trucks are moved far away from the sets because the contractors who built these sets do not drive Toyota trucks.



I would imagine this is the same reason for the lack of competition for Land Rover's vehicles in Oz. Their owners are loyal and will not consider an "interloper."

Steve
__________________
My Filmmaking Career Website
Latest Project: Musclin'

My XB Interceptor project

Wife's 1966 Mustang

My Artworks and Creative Projects Site
Oil Paintings, Airbrushing, Metal Sculpture,
Custom Cars, Replica Movie Props, Videos,
and more!
Ohio XB is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-12-2010, 01:21 AM   #4
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

love the idea, we need more true 4x4s on the market. Sadly, the market is all about soft off-roaders now. An alternative to the Jeep Wrangler would be good. Ford has the Land Rover off-road technology. I would like to see a 4x4 with a fully boxed frame, Dana axles with Detroit lockers, 6 speed manual with 8 speed auto option. Maybe even use the 4.4L V8 diesel. I think if they do a great job like this, you could draw people from other brands. Just keep doing what Ford is doing with the EcoBoost F150. Prove to people why your new product is so much better. Eventually the misconceptions will go away if it really is a better product.
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-12-2010, 01:39 AM   #5
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default

For traditional passenger car manufacturers like Ford and Holden, delving into the 4x4 market (themselves, as in doing the R&D and manufacturing) is hardly worth it for the numbers they'd sell - the capital outlay would take years to recoup. Far easier for them to dip into the corporate global showroom and offer a vehicle where the hard work has already been done. Oh wait a minute - that's what they did.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-12-2010, 06:47 AM   #6
wrongwaynorris
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
wrongwaynorris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f1tzy
Most people who buy cruisers or patrols would never buy anything else purely due to the branding
Proving a fool and his money are easily parted .
wrongwaynorris is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-12-2010, 10:40 AM   #7
Ben73
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ben73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevypower
love the idea, we need more true 4x4s on the market. Sadly, the market is all about soft off-roaders now. An alternative to the Jeep Wrangler would be good.
Jeep is possibly making a Ute version of the Wrangler.





Jeeps are my favorite 4x4's but this ute is just ugly.
Ben73 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-12-2010, 08:53 PM   #8
ZA-289
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ZA-289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,343
Default

Brad loyalty is a big thing, this is why the poms but land rovers and the yanks buy jeeps.

Both those vehicles are avaliable in OZ + cruiser and patrol.

Which ones sell the most? Cruiser and Patrol... Because we have no brand loyalty to either Land rover, jeep, nissan or toyota. We pick the best car.

Nissan and Toyota ARE the best. I douby anything ford or holden could produce would be better than a Turbo Diesel Cruiser or Patrol.
ZA-289 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-12-2010, 09:00 PM   #9
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,591
Default

Id settle for the SVT Raptor...now that is a 4x4
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-12-2010, 09:39 PM   #10
cheek
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
cheek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Montrose, Victoria
Posts: 1,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZA-289
Brad loyalty is a big thing, this is why the poms but land rovers and the yanks buy jeeps.

Both those vehicles are avaliable in OZ + cruiser and patrol.

Which ones sell the most? Cruiser and Patrol... Because we have no brand loyalty to either Land rover, jeep, nissan or toyota. We pick the best car.

Nissan and Toyota ARE the best. I douby anything ford or holden could produce would be better than a Turbo Diesel Cruiser or Patrol.
Its true. I somehow think farmer joe would not give two hoots about the brand of work horse he's using, as long as it does the job..
I wish ford made a landcruiser ute type vehicle but even if they did, their dealerships would let them down.
There is a reason toyota is the highest selling car maker in aus!
cheek is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-12-2010, 09:47 PM   #11
FPV8U
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
 
FPV8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polyal
Id settle for the SVT Raptor...now that is a 4x4

...
FPV8U is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-12-2010, 10:03 PM   #12
Mark^^
Two-Spirits
 
Mark^^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,214
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben73
Jeep is possibly making a Ute version of the Wrangler.





Jeeps are my favorite 4x4's but this ute is just ugly.

Reminds me of my old J10, shame it was never a challenge to Toyota in the early 80’s, was an awesome truck and I continue regretting selling it. Jeeps aren’t made to be pretty, ugly is required.

Mark^^ is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-12-2010, 11:22 PM   #13
388cube_edxr8
Nutty Professor
 
388cube_edxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben73
Jeep is possibly making a Ute version of the Wrangler.





Jeeps are my favorite 4x4's but this ute is just ugly.
I can spot 2 things wrong with that Jeep already. First of all, a 4x4 does not need chrome wheels.

Second, the spare tyre is on the left. I think we can all agree that there is at least a 50% chance that you will get a puncture on the right hand side of the car. So if you have to pull over to change the tyre, you have to walk between your car and and moving traffic to get the spare wheel off, even if the flat is on the other side of the car (US drive on the right, remember).

Well done Jeep.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy Clarkson
If you buy a rubbish car, what you are saying is "I have no interest in cars." If you have no interest in cars, you have no interest in driving, and if you have no interest in something, it means you're no good at it, which means you must have your driving license taken away.
388cube_edxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 12:39 AM   #14
snappy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
snappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,374
Default

I dont actually mind that jeep but i always had a soft spot for sqaure cars.
snappy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 01:26 AM   #15
atec77
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 388cube_edxr8
I can spot 2 things wrong with that Jeep already. First of all, a 4x4 does not need chrome wheels.

Second, the spare tyre is on the left. I think we can all agree that there is at least a 50% chance that you will get a puncture on the right hand side of the car. So if you have to pull over to change the tyre, you have to walk between your car and and moving traffic to get the spare wheel off, even if the flat is on the other side of the car (US drive on the right, remember).

Well done Jeep.
Two things , the chrome doesn't stop the wheel being useful and you might be surprised to find generally it is a better finish for the intended purpose than some soft easily damaged paint , also if I were taking a wheel off a car I prefer to have it between me and the traffic which is where it is on my Bronco
atec77 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 08:14 AM   #16
Ben73
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ben73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,344
Default

I drive brand new, and the previous model Toyota Prados for work, and I must say the oldest one with 250,000kms+ still runs fantastic, never misses a beat, starts straightaway each time.

These Prados have be absolutely THRASHED weekly for 3 years/250,000kms and still run perfect.
Regular services every 10,000kms, and all parts have been replaced when necessary. I would recommend a Toyota Prado to anyone who wanted a reliable 4x4.

The only problem I had was getting a flat tyre when driving on ballast and through water up to 2 foot deep, at speed from 40-70km/h
Ben73 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 09:43 AM   #17
302 XC
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,527
Default

99% of cow cockies drive cruiser utes
Theres alot of these around
For the rest most that know whats what will either buy a cruiser or patrol

I have a few fords and a few patrols
Ford would have offer something real good to get me to be rid of the patrols
Off road ability,power
Id step upto a 7.3 Turbo diesel F Truck

As mentioned above ,most are soft roaders nowadays
302 XC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 10:23 AM   #18
Raptor
^^^^^^^^
Donating Member2
 
Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: online - duh
Posts: 9,642
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For quietly going about moderating in a fair and even manner. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG34JA
.....
Love to hear thoughts on why there never was/will be (?) an Aussie made "Cruiser" on this continent, or why there should be!
You've never heard of OKA then? http://www.oka.com.au

Their business case told them not to pursue the urban/retail market but instead go after the more hard core mine/tourist operator.

Quote:
Welcome to OKA, home of the iconic Australian-made 4x4 vehicles that are renowned for their outstanding performance in extreme conditions, including mine sites and the outback.

Built for a variety of purposes, the OKA range includes single and multi-cab utility vehicles to custom models like campers, tour buses and emergency service vehicles....
__________________
.
'93 XG Falcon Ute( sold ) : '94 ED Falcon Classic ( sold ) : '04 Territory SX TS ( sold ) : '04 Falcon RTV BAII ute (still in the family)
Raptor is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 12:41 PM   #19
Poetic Justice
NOT A TOYOTA :/
 
Poetic Justice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Eastern Suburbs, Melb
Posts: 2,554
Default

The amount of R&D that goes into these vehicles is phenominal. So if GM or Ford were to do it, they would need to be doing it on a global level. Toyota's products (Prado and Landcruiser 70 & 200) are developed for the whole world therefore they can justify the development costs.

In Australia's current market though, you can't really overly compare Patrol to Landcruiser. Landcruiser is currently streets ahead of it in terms of ability and modernisation. The Patrol is very dated.

As for the spare wheel on the Jeep, wouldn't it make sense to have the spare wheel sitting on the side that is in fact not on the traffic side of the vehicle? Much the same reason as to why most vehicles have their fuel filler cap on the passenger side these days.
__________________
06 LandbargeCruiser Sahara
Managed to remain in the v8 fraternity
Poetic Justice is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 01:04 PM   #20
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default

I think the spare wheel on that Jeep would fall foul of ADR's as well...
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 05:17 PM   #21
AWD Chaser
Formally Kia Chaser
 
AWD Chaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 2,493
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Do you mean like the Holden Jackaroo? (or the HSV Jackaroo for that)?
__________________
Kia Grand Carnival (2006)
Silver, Grill Mesh, Tints, Sidesteps (with lights), Towbar, 7" Touch Screen DVD Tuner with intergrated GPS & Bluetooth, Roof Mounted Flip Down 15.1" LCD Screen, Reverse Camera - 184Kw

HSV Clubsport R8 VY (2003)
Black, 6sp Manual, Coulson Seats, Red on black interior, Pacemaker extractors, Twin 2.5" exhaust, Custom Red 20" VE GTS Rims, Custom Red Stitching
AWD Chaser is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 05:39 PM   #22
TUF_302
The Vengeful One
Donating Member1
 
TUF_302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tazzy
Posts: 12,765
Default

I own a GU Patrol and the main reason for that is the low maintenance, reliability and finish of a Jap 4wd, Cruisers, Patrols, Hilux's and Navara's sell well for one reason, they do the job they were made to do well! the only Ford 4x4 I'd consider is a Ranger
__________________
TUF_302 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 05:41 PM   #23
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZA-289
Nissan and Toyota ARE the best. I douby anything ford or holden could produce would be better than a Turbo Diesel Cruiser or Patrol.
I don't know whether to laugh or vomit. Toyotas are the most overrated mediocre pieces of crap I have ever driven. LC200 = large soft roader. LC70 series = just an old fashioned, over-priced piece of crap, that has a little more off-road capability than a LC200. Yes, I have driven them. I have been impressed at the off-road ability of Range Rovers, Discoveries, and the new Grand Cherokee, especially considering how well balanced they are on-road. Purely based on off-road performance from a stock 4x4 at a decent price, it's hard to go past a Wrangler Rubicon.

Last edited by chevypower; 13-12-2010 at 05:50 PM.
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 06:22 PM   #24
Ben73
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ben73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,344
Default

Land Cruisers and Patrols are too big to be great offroaders.
Ben73 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-12-2010, 07:28 PM   #25
wrongwaynorris
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
wrongwaynorris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevypower
I don't know whether to laugh or vomit. Toyotas are the most overrated mediocre pieces of crap I have ever driven. LC200 = large soft roader. LC70 series = just an old fashioned, over-priced piece of crap, that has a little more off-road capability than a LC200. Yes, I have driven them. I have been impressed at the off-road ability of Range Rovers, Discoveries, and the new Grand Cherokee, especially considering how well balanced they are on-road. Purely based on off-road performance from a stock 4x4 at a decent price, it's hard to go past a Wrangler Rubicon.
Exactly and to this day the ONLY vehicle that has ever traversed the entire length of the Darian Gap is a Range Rover , Cruisers and Patrols are mere wanna be pretenders . Back in the 70's Toyota and Patrol owners ridiculed the Range Rover yet both Toyota and Nissan have subsequently both tried their damndest to copy it . Immitation is the kindest form of flattery .
wrongwaynorris is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-12-2010, 04:37 PM   #26
outback_ute
Ute Forum Moderator
Contributing Member
 
outback_ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 7,227
Default

When Mitsubishi were in the doldrums I thought they would have been better off designing and building the Pajero here, to use the local engineering expertise and also take advantage of the Aust. outback image for exports.
outback_ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-12-2010, 05:16 PM   #27
Brazen
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Brazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outback_ute
When Mitsubishi were in the doldrums I thought they would have been better off designing and building the Pajero here, to use the local engineering expertise and also take advantage of the Aust. outback image for exports.
That was actually discussed by Mistsubishi! Australia is one of Pajeros biggest markets in the world.

To answer the OP, yes I think Australia would do very well. Look at Ford AU, the Ranger will be the first proper 4wd they have engineered, yet I am betting it will thrash the pants off Nissans and Toyotas in nearly every criteria. Its a shame its not going to be built here, as I could really see a 4wd being Australian being a big selling point, more than it is for passenger cars.
Brazen is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-12-2010, 05:30 PM   #28
TRUBLU4DS
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor
You've never heard of OKA then? http://www.oka.com.au

Their business case told them not to pursue the urban/retail market but instead go after the more hard core mine/tourist operator.
I worked at OKA, they were way to heavy over the front axle. From memory i think 3 were built for an Arab Sheik with TPI 350 Chev power, they were fun.
TRUBLU4DS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-12-2010, 05:55 PM   #29
JG34JA
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 487
Default

Hey everyone thank you for the great posts.

I never thought I'd start a thread and get such responses, cheers.

Raptor, yes I remember OKA's, they were made in Ossy Park(?) in Perth I think. I don't consider them anything like a Cruiser, they are more like an 11 seat bus in size - should have mentioned them in the OP. My mates did think they were the ultimate travel beasts though! As you quite rightly said, their focus is different.

In the same vein as a 'Cruiser, there was the XY 4x4 ute, produced here and dying of ADR regulations. Reborn in echo as the RTV a handy and missed niche in the market. Soon Ford has an Aussie designed Ranger in the dual/single cab ute category.

So far many posts have mentioned reliability, R&D cost and brand loyalty as factors. But folks, isn't brand loyalty earned? The hard yards done by the FJ/BJ40 family, cemented by the 60 and 70 series, consolidated by the 80 series hold Toyota in great stead now, despite more recent criticism of their 4x4 products. For my experience, a 60 wagon took us around Australia reliably and in my mind "earned" its brand's reputation. Any one or any product worthy can earn a good reputation, no matter who builds it.

There is nothing to say that a concerted effort, assuming Howard Hughes style funding and resolve by Australians could not produce a domestic equivalent of the FJ40, that in 40 years time would see its descendants rule the market. All it takes is the will. That's why Toyota is on top now.
JG34JA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-12-2010, 06:17 PM   #30
irish2
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 388cube_edxr8

Second, the spare tyre is on the left. I think we can all agree that there is at least a 50% chance that you will get a puncture on the right hand side of the car. So if you have to pull over to change the tyre, you have to walk between your car and and moving traffic to get the spare wheel off, even if the flat is on the other side of the car (US drive on the right, remember).

Well done Jeep.

You don't pull over to change a tyre? Last time I looked we drive on the left hand side of the road in a right hand drive car.
irish2 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL