Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29-04-2011, 08:46 PM   #1
rijruna
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 52
Default modern engineering design principles

This explains a lot of things, I see it now! Things aint changed much over time, really,,

http://komplexify.com/epsilon/2009/0...gn-principles/

cheers
rij

rijruna is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2011, 09:45 PM   #2
GasoLane
Former BTIKD
Donating Member2
 
GasoLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sunny Downtown Wagga Wagga. NSW.
Posts: 53,197
Default Re: modern engineering design principles

Good thing the author of that article doesn't live here. I forget exactly how many gauges our railways have....about 6 I think
__________________
Dying at your job is natures way of saying that you're in the wrong line of work.
GasoLane is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2011, 10:02 PM   #3
SteveJH
No longer a Uni student..
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
Default Re: modern engineering design principles

From the comments section of the article.

http://www.snopes.com/history/american/gauge.asp

Its very well written though.
SteveJH is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2011, 08:04 PM   #4
2011G6E
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
2011G6E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
Default Re: modern engineering design principles

I'd seen this one years back, and also the Snopes research showing it's false...it's a beauty though isn't it?
Queensland has a rail guage of 3 foot 6 inches..."Narrow Gauge"...
2011G6E is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2011, 08:17 PM   #5
shedcoupe
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 589
Default Re: modern engineering design principles

The historical background to the railway gauge thing is -

Vic - 'rich' (from gold rush) = wide gauge = expensive rolling stock, rail bed etc.
NSW = 'average wealth' = standard gauge
Qld = 'poor' = narrow gauge

(I think)
shedcoupe is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2011, 08:36 PM   #6
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,412
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: modern engineering design principles

Quote:
Originally Posted by shedcoupe
The historical background to the railway gauge thing is -

Vic - 'rich' (from gold rush) = wide gauge = expensive rolling stock, rail bed etc.
NSW = 'average wealth' = standard gauge
Qld = 'poor' = narrow gauge

(I think)
Actually, at one point NSW, Victoria and South Australia had agreed on 4 feet 8 and a half inch gauge
which was being proposed as the new European Standard gauge at a conference in Europe.
At the urging of the NSW Chief mechanical Engineer who just happened to be an Irishman,
the other two states were convinced to go with Broad gauge and that by grouping the orders
the costs of locomotives and rolling stock would be kept economical for all three states.

All was well until the CME had a dispute about his salary conditions with the Commissioner,
he felt his position was untenable and promptly left. His replacement was a Scotsman who
had just come fro a European conference on unifying European rail gauges by adopting
the four feet eight and a half inch (Roman Chariot) as Standard gauge.

The new CME convinced the NSW commissioner that locomotives and rolling stock
ordered from Europe in Standard gauge would be far cheaper than Broad gauge so
NSW did an 11th hour switch and left the other two states high and dry because they
had already been convinced by NSW to go with Broad gauge and had ordered engines
and rolling stock that were on ships to Australia. They would not change again.

The other States, Queensland, Tasmania, Western Australia and minor routes in
South Australia would remain with the lighter and economical 3 foot 6 inch cape gauge.

Last edited by jpd80; 30-04-2011 at 08:49 PM.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL