Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25-10-2010, 07:28 PM   #1
Jim Goose
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
Default Territory Airbag fails to deploy

Watching the local news tonight and the owner of Territory isnt too happy.
Several weeks ago he was involved in a head on collision with a truck.
His Territory was written off.
Impact was bad enough that his seat rails were almost ripped off.
Yet his airbag didnt deploy.

After sending his car to the local Ford dealer he got a responce saying that the impact was NOT "severe" enough to deploy airbags!

Hmmmmmm

2 weeks in hospital with chest injuries.... not severe enough???

The speed wasnt mentioned but the vehicle is severly damaged enough that it cant be fixed (well yes anything can be fixed, but how much money does one wanna spend?).

Any other instances of this?

__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions??

Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole....
Jim Goose is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 07:36 PM   #2
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,055
Default

Seat rails ripped off....Let me guess, he was on the wrong side of 100kg.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 07:54 PM   #3
Kryton
 
Kryton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,292
Default

Dont see what the issue is really.
What Ford said is correct, there airbag wasnt needed in this instance.
The car has crumpled and absorbed the impact - which it is meant to do.
Seat rails are irrelevant, just the same as the amount of damage to the car.
If the car is written off, so be it, doesnt mean the airbag was needed though.
You might find his injuries were caused by the seat belt as well.
Kryton is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 07:57 PM   #4
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

So he survived a head on with a truck and he is complaining?
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 07:58 PM   #5
Jim Goose
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
Default

No the guy wasnt fat.... which worries me if the seat rails tore.
The seat had moved forward by an inch or so and the driver side seat rail had very little metal left before it snapped completely..

Yes I agree the car crumpled as its suppoed to, but there have been accidents in which cars have less apparent damage where the airbag has deployed.
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions??

Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole....
Jim Goose is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:01 PM   #6
Jim Goose
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
So he survived a head on with a truck and he is complaining?
Yes! lol..... well he is complaining about the lack of airbag deployment.
He was surprised it didnt work.
It wasnt what one would call a fatal type impact, as he didnt need to be cut out of the vehicle.
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions??

Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole....
Jim Goose is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:08 PM   #7
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Well I would rather walk away from an accident with no airbag deployment then dead with somewhere to rest my head.

Sometimes the sensor doesn't resister. Not the first time I've heard of this.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:12 PM   #8
gthofan
Gunna girlie-man
 
gthofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bayswater North, victoria
Posts: 2,587
Default

Here is some good info about airbags, http://smh.drive.com.au/motor-news/d...0331-refb.html

In particular- "Emergency braking alone is not enough to trigger the airbags, as it generates only about one G-force. Airbags are generally triggered by forces of more than 20 Gs, or 20 times the force of gravity."

I always thought airbags should only deploy in life threatening situations, and in this case, he's alive so obviously they were not needed.
__________________
WADE CAMS-- UNLEASH THE POWER!!


<INSERT WITTY SIGNATURE HERE>

Daily- 05' BA futura... work done.
Cruiser- 85' VK berlina... more work done
gthofan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:29 PM   #9
3vXT
...
 
3vXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,046
Default

The next time we hear from this guy it'll be a link to a story about him suing Ford. If the car was really really smashed up I'd expect the airbag to have deployed but there is no guarantee that it'll go off.
3vXT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:32 PM   #10
redxm
64 Deluxe 4 door
Donating Member3
 
redxm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius
Posts: 10,445
Default

Ive seen a Patrol with the front wheels under the drivers seat and no airbag deployment.
Manufacturers spend zillions to get this right. The bloke is alive with a few busted ribs. Id call that a win, could have been much worse.
__________________
XM Deluxe
FG XR50
BA Pursuit Ute
redxm is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:34 PM   #11
g220ba
FGX XR8
 
g220ba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 702
Default

I love this sort of crap, nobody has any understanding of how an airbag system works and just expects it to go off at the slightest impact.

He's alive because the car did what it's supposed to do, regardless of the seat moving or any other damage if the system detects enough force the airbag will deploy.
g220ba is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:45 PM   #12
Bobman
Regulator
 
Bobman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,168
Default

If the impact missed the sensor then that could be a reason why they didn't deploy.

That said, I've seen nasty wrecks without airbag deployment and I've seen lightly damaged vehicles where the airbag did deploy.
__________________
Regards
Bobby

Current Cars:
2000 AU2 Fairmont (2019-current)
2003 BA1 Falcon Divvy Van (2017-current)
2009 VW Mk6 Golf 118TSi (2020-current)
Previous Cars:
2003 MCX10R Avalon VXi (2017-2020)
1995 EF1 Falcon GLi (2016-2019)
1997 XH2 Falcon Van OPT20 (2016-2019)
2006 BF Fairlane Ghia (2013-2018)
2001 AU3 Futura (2010-2013)
1996 EL Fairmont (2008-2010)
2004 BA XR6 (2005-2008)
2001 AU2 Forte (2005-2006)
1988 EA Fairmont Ghia (2003-2005)
1984 AR Telstar TX5 Ghia (2001-2005)
Bobman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 09:06 PM   #13
bobthebilda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Goose
No the guy wasnt fat.... which worries me if the seat rails tore.
The seat had moved forward by an inch or so and the driver side seat rail had very little metal left before it snapped completely..
.

It would be a concern if the seat rail snapped. The lower rails were made in australia up till a few years ago, but are now imported from china. Initial imports were apparantly quite high in rejects.

Any idea how old the Territory was.
bobthebilda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 09:16 PM   #14
Jesmol
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobthebilda
It would be a concern if the seat rail snapped. The lower rails were made in australia up till a few years ago, but are now imported from china. Initial imports were apparantly quite high in rejects.

Any idea how old the Territory was.
Jan 2008 was the time they changed over.
Jesmol is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 09:37 PM   #15
geckoGT
Ich bin ein auslander
 
geckoGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loving the Endorphine Machine
Posts: 7,453
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always level headed and i notice him being the voice of reason when a thread may be getting heated 
Default

Without knowing the speed of impact and direction of forces it is hard to say for sure but from the description of the damage I would say the airbag should have deployed. A head on crash significant enough to seriously deform frontal structures and damage seat rails should have deployed airbags. The damage to the seat rails and the injuries to the driver demonstrate that despite the crumple zones, there was still significant force applied to the occupants, a situation that airbags are fitted for. I have been to hundreds of lesser crashes (no damage to seating and no thorax injuries to the driver) that have triggered airbags in all types of vehicles.
__________________
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!
geckoGT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 09:48 PM   #16
Jim Goose
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 84ltd
I love this sort of crap, nobody has any understanding of how an airbag system works and just expects it to go off at the slightest impact.

He's alive because the car did what it's supposed to do, regardless of the seat moving or any other damage if the system detects enough force the airbag will deploy.
No where did i say the owner (or myself) expect the airbag to deploy at the slightest impact.

I did say the Territory was written off and had significant damage.
It was a head on with a truck.

The seat rail damage is also a worry....
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions??

Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole....
Jim Goose is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 09:50 PM   #17
Joe5619
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,653
Default

I've never understand people.. They are here to tell us a story of getting hit by a truck, yet still find something to complain about??.. The guy just won Lotto for F sack!! Get on with life, it is too short!!
Joe5619 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 09:58 PM   #18
gthofan
Gunna girlie-man
 
gthofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bayswater North, victoria
Posts: 2,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe5619
The guy just won Lotto for F sack!!!

Like he's won the lotto, but payed out in 50's rather than 100's

However the damage to the seat rail is a real concern if ford have changed their parts supplyer.
__________________
WADE CAMS-- UNLEASH THE POWER!!


<INSERT WITTY SIGNATURE HERE>

Daily- 05' BA futura... work done.
Cruiser- 85' VK berlina... more work done
gthofan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:03 PM   #19
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default

How does a seat rail "almost rip off" this story makes no sense.
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:07 PM   #20
04redxr8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
04redxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 601
Default

Can't understand the fuss either. Airbags are a supplemantary safety device. Meaning they are a back up safety device. The seatbelt being the primary device. Cars these days are designed to crumple around the occupants and protect them in safety cell like structures.

Makes me think that may be a bad thing if this person survived a head on with a truck and still winged.
04redxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:15 PM   #21
geckoGT
Ich bin ein auslander
 
geckoGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loving the Endorphine Machine
Posts: 7,453
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always level headed and i notice him being the voice of reason when a thread may be getting heated 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe5619
I've never understand people.. They are here to tell us a story of getting hit by a truck, yet still find something to complain about??.. The guy just won Lotto for F sack!! Get on with life, it is too short!!
Would you not be concerned if a major safety feature of your vehicle failed? I know would want to know why and I think Ford should perhaps have a look for the reason, perhaps there is a problem and next time the occupant may not be so lucky. Instead they fill you with crap about how they all do that or it is within tolerances, without even looking. Safety devices not functioning are the things large law suits are made of.

You need to understand something here, chest injuries that require 2 weeks of hospitalisation is not insignificant (it is not just a couple of busted ribs). A bit more force and that would have been fatal, a bit less and it would have been no hospitalisation. What we don't know is what he hit his chest on. If he hit his chest on the steering wheel and the airbag did not deploy, he probably has good grounds for a law suit against Ford, that is what airbags are there for.

I also have little doubt that had the vehicle involved been a Holden Captiva, the responses here would be very different.
__________________
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!
geckoGT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:15 PM   #22
Jim Goose
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
How does a seat rail "almost rip off" this story makes no sense.
The seat contains weight (the driver).
the vehicle suddenly stops because of impact....
the seat wants to travel forwards because of inertia, the bolts and seat rails are designed to stop this.

However the footage showed at least the drivers side seat rail had almost torn in half just above the attach point where the bolt is.

Watch the video footage of crash testing and you will see the seats lurch forward and the seat back usually breaking..
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions??

Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole....
Jim Goose is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:15 PM   #23
bobthebilda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
How does a seat rail "almost rip off" this story makes no sense.

Well you would think that the passenger would have been restrained by belt (pretensioner), and this would allow little movement for the seat rails to rip off.

Not sure what the drivers seat was ( 4 way or 6 way), but the 4 ways (hand rail activated) are very flimsy.

It would be unlikely that the lower part of the rails (bolted to car) would rip off, more likely to be a separation between the upper and lower rails (weakest part of track). As said before, these were initially made in OZ, but outsourced to china. Once in OZ, they are assembled by a company that almost went belly up a few years ago (cut back quite alot on the technical side). The only testing Ford does on these parts when seats are fitted in plant, are to slide seat forward and backward (by operator).
bobthebilda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:18 PM   #24
Jim Goose
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
Default

Bob it wasnt the upper and lower seperating... the steel frame had actually torn apart
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions??

Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole....
Jim Goose is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:27 PM   #25
geckoGT
Ich bin ein auslander
 
geckoGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loving the Endorphine Machine
Posts: 7,453
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always level headed and i notice him being the voice of reason when a thread may be getting heated 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobthebilda
Well you would think that the passenger would have been restrained by belt (pretensioner), and this would allow little movement for the seat rails to rip off.

.
The seat belt pretensioner would have some effect but the problem is the belt is anchored in 3 points, the floor, B pillar and seat. Any significant force must be spread across those three points, in this case the weakest of them failed which was the seat rail.

You may also find there is some give engineered into the seat rail to allow the seat belt to give and slow the occupant down. If the seat belt was absolutely rigidly mounted, it can cause significant deceleration injuries in the chest as internal organs can not withstand the forces involved. I suspect the system in high force frontal crashes is the seat rail gives way at a certain force which slows the forces, much as crumple zones do. This system is supposed to be backed up by the airbags which will further slow the occupant before any impact with internal car surfaces occurs.
__________________
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!
geckoGT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:32 PM   #26
bobthebilda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Goose
Bob it wasnt the upper and lower seperating... the steel frame had actually torn apart

That would be a very big concern. The passenger load and belt would limit the damage done. Imagine if someone was rear ended in a territory, the seat would have potential to crush rear passengers.
bobthebilda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:37 PM   #27
Jim Goose
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
Default

i wonder if any of the manufacturers keep any data on crashes of current model cars?
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions??

Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole....
Jim Goose is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:42 PM   #28
geckoGT
Ich bin ein auslander
 
geckoGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loving the Endorphine Machine
Posts: 7,453
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always level headed and i notice him being the voice of reason when a thread may be getting heated 
Default

Just had another thought.

In the Ford systems, do the seat belt pre tensioners trigger off the frontal crash sensor or do they have their own sensor?

The reason I bring this up is because if the frontal crash sensor was defective (as suggested by the lack of airbag deployment) and the pre tensioners trigger off that sensor in a frontal crash, then the pre tensioners would not have functioned either. That would also go some way to explaining the significant injury the occupant sustained.
__________________
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!
geckoGT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:47 PM   #29
bobthebilda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geckoGT
Just had another thought.

In the Ford systems, do the seat belt pre tensioners trigger off the frontal crash sensor or do they have their own sensor?

The reason I bring this up is because if the frontal crash sensor was defective (as suggested by the lack of airbag deployment) and the pre tensioners trigger off that sensor in a frontal crash, then the pre tensioners would not have functioned either. That would also go some way to explaining the significant injury the occupant sustained.

Regardless, the pretensioners function is only to take off the little bit of slack that is left, when the seat belt locks. At the very least, the belt should have locked, thus severely decreasing any forward body movement of the occupant (and seat)
bobthebilda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:56 PM   #30
bobthebilda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geckoGT
The seat belt pretensioner would have some effect but the problem is the belt is anchored in 3 points, the floor, B pillar and seat. Any significant force must be spread across those three points, in this case the weakest of them failed which was the seat rail.

You may also find there is some give engineered into the seat rail to allow the seat belt to give and slow the occupant down. If the seat belt was absolutely rigidly mounted, it can cause significant deceleration injuries in the chest as internal organs can not withstand the forces involved. I suspect the system in high force frontal crashes is the seat rail gives way at a certain force which slows the forces, much as crumple zones do. This system is supposed to be backed up by the airbags which will further slow the occupant before any impact with internal car surfaces occurs.

sorry gecko, didnt see your psoting before last response. You are correct in the 3 rd point being the seat track, and as a result, I would assume there would be no tolerance for any malfunction in this anchor point. Maybe I am reading what you wrote incorrectly, but if the body mass is flung forward, then it wouldnt matter if seat (behind) was rigid. Without a correctly functioning seat belt (ie 3rd anchor on track being ok), the driver would continue flying forward, never to see the seat again.
bobthebilda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL