Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-12-2010, 09:58 AM   #1
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,318
Smile HOLDEN Boss: "Australians still want large cars

HOLDEN: Australians still want large cars
Toby Hagon
December 10, 2010 - 3:22PM

Australians still want large cars according to Holden boss.
Holden boss says company is confident there is a future for Commodore - providing it continues fuel economy improvements.

Australians will still want large cars for large families and a large country, according to Holden chairman and CEO Mike Devereux.

But it will have to be more fuel efficient than ever, with Holden improving economy on the large car - the best seller for 15 straight years - to as little as 8.4 litres per 100km in the short term.

Speaking to journalists at an end of year lunch, he confirmed the next "two or three months" would involve some big decisions about the long term future of the Commodore.


"Long term we have some architectural decisions to be making in the next two, three months," said Devereux.

But he believes there is still a market for large cars, albeit one that is posing challenges for the likes of the locally produced Commodore and its Ford rival, the Falcon. The pair are focused largely on the Australian markets, reducing the economies of scale that inevitably come with more global products.

"We're still very confident Australians want to have families with backyards," said Devereux.

The current VE model Commodore went on sale in 2006 and its underpinnings are expected to continue until about 2015 when an all-new model is due. Until then there will be various styling and engineering updates, including the arrival of a dedicated LPG variant in the second half of 2011.

Holden will also add E85 capability - running on a mix of petrol and up to 85 per cent ethanol - next year as part of an MY12 (model year 2012) update.

Devereux confirmed various updates to the Commodore - many focusing on reduced fuel use - will reduce consumption to as little as 8.4 litres per 100km, an eight per cent improvement over today's Commodore.

It's understood everything is on the table for the all-new Commodore - which will have to continue at least five (or possibly 10) years into the future - including new body styles, engines and concepts.

__________________
CSGhia
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 10:35 AM   #2
Falcon Coupe
Clevo Mafia Inc.
 
Falcon Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,496
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: The exceptional contribution made to AFF over an extended period of time. Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Your tireless efforts behind the scenes in keeping AFF the place it is. 
Default

Well so far AFM and SIDI have failed to deliver and ethanol isn't wide spread enough to be feasible.

They are still barking up the wrong tree and need an ecoboost type engine.
Falcon Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 10:54 AM   #3
glavas
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane cannon hill
Posts: 310
Default

Of course we want large cars who on earth would go on a family road trip in a swift!!!! Fuel consumption is good enough. I get 12l/100 km in a 335 rwkw v8 which in my books is awesome.
glavas is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 11:10 AM   #4
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,318
Default

I did it in a Festiva, Brisbane to Perth ..10 years ago!!!
__________________
CSGhia
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 01:19 PM   #5
glavas
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane cannon hill
Posts: 310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csv8
I did it in a Festiva, Brisbane to Perth ..10 years ago!!!

bit of a dare devil ay?
glavas is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 01:33 PM   #6
b0son
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falcon Coupe
They are still barking up the wrong tree and need an ecoboost type engine.
So do Ford... or is it available at last?
b0son is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 01:37 PM   #7
b0son
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glavas
Of course we want large cars who on earth would go on a family road trip in a swift!!!!
We take our GTI. It may be smaller but it is a better drive than my previous XR6 in every way. Handles better. Quicker. More comfortable inside. More comfortable for the driver over many hours (Syd->Ade 14hours). Uses way less fuel. Kids dont need the extra leg room which is about the only advantage the Falcon had. Even the boot in the Golf is more useable FFS..
b0son is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 01:49 PM   #8
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

'Small' cars have come a long way in a short space of time. You don't need a Falcon or Commodore to be comfy anymore.

I want to see the Commodore and Falcon to continue on indefinitely but Holden and Ford need to figure out exactly what the X-Factor is (or should be) for their large cars, and exploit it.

I've found myself increasingly tempted by the new Fiesta as a run-around, or the 2011 Focus Zetec/ST as a proper alternative to a Falcon. So much bang for your buck! (The AU XR8 will stay in the ledfoot household indefinitely as a weekender however, I love it too mch)
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 01:59 PM   #9
ST
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne - Eastern Suburbs
Posts: 956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b0son
We take our GTI. It may be smaller but it is a better drive than my previous XR6 in every way. Handles better. Quicker. More comfortable inside. More comfortable for the driver over many hours (Syd->Ade 14hours). Uses way less fuel. Kids dont need the extra leg room which is about the only advantage the Falcon had. Even the boot in the Golf is more useable FFS..
Your previous Falcon didn't happen to have a Fiesta badge on the back did it?

A lot of those points are understandable (and subjective), but the boot? You are kidding yourself there.

As for the topic at hand, I don't believe Australians in general still want large cars. When you see tradies driving around in Hyundai Excels you know the day of the large car is over.
__________________
2007 BF MKII XR6 CONQUER
ST is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 02:03 PM   #10
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,318
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glavas
bit of a dare devil ay?
No !! mad!!! but a fun trip!!
__________________
CSGhia
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 02:06 PM   #11
kezzer
Regular Member
 
kezzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 489
Default

A G6e is much more comfortable then any GTI I've been in (misses has one). Look at the price difference also, 5k in some circumstances. No thanks.

I hope large cars stick around for many years to come.
__________________
FG XR6: pacemaker sterline coated headers, Xr8 snorkel + modified CAI, 100cpsi ballistic cat, 20" rims, lower with shocks, custom catback exhaust, custom spacers, tune soon to come, 1/4mile soon to come.
kezzer is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 02:15 PM   #12
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

Small cars suck for long trips.

We have a 4 month old Audi S3, while it is a nice little package, for spending anything more than an hour in it becomes painful. Literally.

The seats are hard, the suspension is hard (not firm, it is bloody hard) and it is cramped for two of us in the front - can't even 'share' the centre arm rest FFS.

And I make this comparison to Falcon sized cars - specifically our GT. It is modified for circuit action and is still 10x more comfortable to drive on Tasmanian pot holed and chopped up tarmac - which is 90% of roadways down here.
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 02:23 PM   #13
b0son
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST
A lot of those points are understandable (and subjective), but the boot? You are kidding yourself there.
It's big, yes. But while it's wide, it's too shallow.
b0son is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 02:28 PM   #14
b0son
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kezzer
Look at the price difference also, 5k in some circumstances.
Nowadays, yes. The Falcons have come down in price relatively speaking. The price gap between small and big cars has fallen.

Why? Because unlike Holden's assertion, people dont want big cars anywhere near as much as they used to. One more oil price spike, and say goodbye to the Falcadore.
b0son is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 02:30 PM   #15
ST
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne - Eastern Suburbs
Posts: 956
Default

Really? Which Falcon did you have before your Golf?

In both my AU and BF I can fit a massive 4 speaker stack with pre-amp, something which I cannot do in a Golf boot at all.

The only objective point that can be made is the Falcon boot has much more capacity.
__________________
2007 BF MKII XR6 CONQUER
ST is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 02:40 PM   #16
b0son
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST
Really? Which Falcon did you have before your Golf?
BA.

Quote:
The only objective point that can be made is the Falcon boot has much more capacity.
true, I just found it mostly unuseable for the size/shape of things I needed to carry. TBH, even the rear door shape made it impractical sticking big things on the back seat

eg. getting a filing cabinet home from officeworks - couldnt be done in the falcon in the boot or on the back seat. could in a golf, go figure.

maybe its somthing to do with some of the bigger makers starting to make large hatchbacks... ?
b0son is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 02:42 PM   #17
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glavas
I get 12l/100 km in a 335 rwkw v8 which in my books is awesome.
Yes of course you do........

But what about when you get to the bottom of the big long hill and have to go up the next one?
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 02:53 PM   #18
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b0son
BA.



true, I just found it mostly unuseable for the size/shape of things I needed to carry. TBH, even the rear door shape made it impractical sticking big things on the back seat

eg. getting a filing cabinet home from officeworks - couldnt be done in the falcon in the boot or on the back seat. could in a golf, go figure.

maybe its somthing to do with some of the bigger makers starting to make large hatchbacks... ?
I agree re hatchbacks: the space is just so much more usable/accessible than the space in a sedan. Stuff I couldnt get into my AU went straight into the Mrs' WQ Fiesta. Her new WS is even bigger.
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 03:00 PM   #19
ST
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne - Eastern Suburbs
Posts: 956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b0son
BA.



true, I just found it mostly unuseable for the size/shape of things I needed to carry. TBH, even the rear door shape made it impractical sticking big things on the back seat

eg. getting a filing cabinet home from officeworks - couldnt be done in the falcon in the boot or on the back seat. could in a golf, go figure.

maybe its somthing to do with some of the bigger makers starting to make large hatchbacks... ?
Have to agree with the rear door issue, that has been notorious in the Falcon for a while. It just doesn't open anywhere near as much as it should and who knows why. Very frustrating, especially when (as you have proven) it can come in handy.

But as far as the boot goes I still can't see how it would ever be more advantageous to have a Golf boot rather than a Falcon. There is so much less capacity and barely any more depth.
__________________
2007 BF MKII XR6 CONQUER
ST is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 03:45 PM   #20
b0son
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST
But as far as the boot goes I still can't see how it would ever be more advantageous to have a Golf boot rather than a Falcon. There is so much less capacity and barely any more depth.
Way more depth - the parcel shelf is removable, so you can pack right to the roof.

If you fold the rear seats, the opening between cabin and boot is far bigger in the golf (and other hatchbacks)... like a stationwagon.
b0son is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 04:03 PM   #21
glavas
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane cannon hill
Posts: 310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist
Yes of course you do........

But what about when you get to the bottom of the big long hill and have to go up the next one?
I dont get what you mean???? A small 4 cylinder hatch with gear in the boot and 4 adults would struggle up a steep hill you would have to rev it's guts out. Were my maloo could do it with 8 people in the tray and not even break a sweat. Frankly these whole thing about little cars being better on fuel is nonsense. Large cars have come along way in the fuel consumption department. And after owning v8's all my life I still believe if your getting under 15l/100km your doing well.
glavas is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 04:34 PM   #22
ST
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne - Eastern Suburbs
Posts: 956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b0son
Way more depth - the parcel shelf is removable, so you can pack right to the roof.

If you fold the rear seats, the opening between cabin and boot is far bigger in the golf (and other hatchbacks)... like a stationwagon.
Ahh fair enough, I did not actually know this. That would definitely be useful. I take back what I said, the Golf does have a superior boot (and more capacity with the parcel shelf removed).
__________________
2007 BF MKII XR6 CONQUER
ST is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 05:00 PM   #23
b0son
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glavas
And after owning v8's all my life I still believe if your getting under 15l/100km your doing well.
If you enjoy watching your money going up in smoke... I wouldnt even look at a car anymore that cant get under 10l/100km.
b0son is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 05:28 PM   #24
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b0son
If you enjoy watching your money going up in smoke... I wouldnt even look at a car anymore that cant get under 10l/100km.
Power (and in this case 'that v8 feel') is a luxury that you pay extra for, no different than paying extra for leather or a sunroof etc etc
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 05:46 PM   #25
glavas
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane cannon hill
Posts: 310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b0son
If you enjoy watching your money going up in smoke... I wouldnt even look at a car anymore that cant get under 10l/100km.


I don't smoke I don't drink I own my cars and my houses I earn 120k a year. Driving around in a v8 is the only real enjoyment I have going for me. I only drive 10000 km a year anyway.
glavas is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 06:05 PM   #26
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,777
Default

interesting - holden are releasing a dedicated lpg commodore in the 2nd half of 2011. that will be a blow to falcon. they have had an exclusive product up until now. bit of a lapse at the moment waiting for the new one to come online. i wonder if it will be the same orbital system on the commodore.


and yes, i agree with the holden boss - people do still want large cars. the number of people is less, but there is still a market.
prydey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 06:07 PM   #27
b055m4n
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: wollongong
Posts: 227
Default fuel consumption

hi guys my 06 bf xr8 6 speed manual consistantly returns 9.2-9.6 L/100 fully loaded four adults and luggage driving down the hume to melbourne i love it.
b055m4n is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 07:51 PM   #28
Ben73
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ben73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b055m4n
hi guys my 06 bf xr8 6 speed manual consistantly returns 9.2-9.6 L/100 fully loaded four adults and luggage driving down the hume to melbourne i love it.

I drove a 2009 2.4L 4 cylinder petrol Softroader down the F3 yesterday with 5 people in it and NO Luggage, The average fuel consumption on the freeway was 9.8-10.4L/10kms. FROM A 4 cylinder!!!!

Softroaders are ****!
Ben73 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 08:00 PM   #29
bobthebilda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b055m4n
hi guys my 06 bf xr8 6 speed manual consistantly returns 9.2-9.6 L/100 fully loaded four adults and luggage driving down the hume to melbourne i love it.

Yeah, but like you said, your heading south. Your always gonna get better fuel economy driving downhill
bobthebilda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2010, 08:09 PM   #30
GreenR
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
GreenR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csv8
HOLDEN: Australians still want large cars
Toby Hagon
December 10, 2010 - 3:22PM

"We're still very confident Australians want to have families with backyards," said Devereux.
?? What has backyards got to do with anything. What, families still want to be able to drive their Commodore around the back and park it next the BBQ to lapp up their "Aussiness" while cooking up a Saturday lunch
Families I can understand but still, 4 cylinder cars are suffice for many families.
GreenR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL