Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-2017, 11:42 PM   #1
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

I'm in QLD and looking for a ford ranger for towing purposes so I've been keeping an eye on salvage auctions for both a repairable and a stat writeoff and finally two came up that looked suitable. The stat in QLD and the repairable in NSW, 2 days after.

The stat was won quite cheaply. It's a flood affected vehicle from the recent Cyclone Debbie storm but it didn't have any panel damage so it looked like a good donor car.
The repairable one was pulled from the auction on the morning of auction day as it was listed incorrectly, turns out it was actually also a stat.

So now I have the one stat and am keeping an eye out for another repairable one, but it seems crazy that this stat is a stat.
Water came up and lapped across the seats but it has now been stripped bare and cleaned. The electronics under the dash were not affected and all the wiring plugs that showed corrosion have been repaired. The only module that was affected was the tow assembly under the passenger seat. The engine so far seems fine, gearbox also fine.

Wovi have told me that any part can be re-used from a stat, that the chassis and shell (or sections of it) can be re-used if I have a repairable ranger that is crumpled.
It seems like madness that the same chassis and shell can't remain with the rest of the vehicle - which has no structural damage - but it can be cut up to repair a different car that has considerable structural damage.

It seems like such a waste. The laws appear to have changed since the last time I got a flood-affected car from the auction but it is what it is I guess.

Can anyone tell me if I've understood it correctly? That the chassis/shell/whatever component really, can be taken from a flood-affected-but-undamaged stat and put into a completely crumpled repairable, but components from a repairable can't be put into a flood-affected-but-undamaged-stat?

I'm told by wovi that if I have a repairable and the damaged section is the bit that the VIN is stamped on to... that I can take the same section from another car and then receive a surrogate VIN to be used in place of the two VINs from the original car and the donor. But that it only applies to cars which have structural damage to sections with identifiers so that doesn't apply to me.

If another repairable one doesn't come up, worst case scenario is that this car could be sent off to NZ (with disclosure of its history, of course) for sale so that's no biggy really, but it would be nice to hear if anyone has found their way through the legislation to use majority of the components from a stat.

Last edited by leesa; 02-05-2017 at 11:53 PM.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-05-2017, 11:51 PM   #2
CobraJet351
Regular Member
 
CobraJet351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 194
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

You're making to much sense which is borderline illegal.
CobraJet351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
6 users like this post:
Old 02-05-2017, 11:53 PM   #3
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

I'm not trying to break any laws, I'm just trying to find out if there's a way to skirt around them really closely...
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 08:36 AM   #4
Tassie f100
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,878
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

It would appear that you could buy 2 stat writeoffs and swap the bodies on the chassis and all would be well,if you have interpreted what the authorities have told you correctly
Tassie f100 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 09:24 AM   #5
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tassie f100 View Post
It would appear that you could buy 2 stat writeoffs and swap the bodies on the chassis and all would be well,if you have interpreted what the authorities have told you correctly
Yeah I thought so too, but when I asked if that meant you could effectively use components from two stats to make a car, I was told no, that a repairable still had to be in the mix somewhere. And even though there's no minimum % of parts required from the repairable, it's not enough to just stick a headlight from a repairable on to the other car created from two stats.

I'm confused. According to what I've been told, it sounds like it should be do-able but apparently it is not.
So I thought I'd ask around here to try and get some input from others to see if anyone has found a way.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 09:58 AM   #6
Pedro
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hervey Bay
Posts: 4,198
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tassie f100 View Post
It would appear that you could buy 2 stat writeoffs and swap the bodies on the chassis and all would be well,if you have interpreted what the authorities have told you correctly
No - if a stat has the VIN on the body then you can't use it.

But apart from that, Why does a flood affected vehicle have to be automatically classed as a non registrable stat? Why not have it classed as a flood affected vehicle with a standard attached "no recourse" notice to any prospective purchaser of the inherent risks involved. It's then up to the purchaser to decide if they agree to take those risks.
Pedro is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 10:07 AM   #7
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedro View Post
No - if a stat has the VIN on the body then you can't use it.

But apart from that, Why does a flood affected vehicle have to be automatically classed as a non registrable stat? Why not have it classed as a flood affected vehicle with a standard attached "no recourse" notice to any prospective purchaser of the inherent risks involved. It's then up to the purchaser to decide if they agree to take those risks.
You can't use the VIN, you can still use the body that the VIN is attached to.

As for why a flood affected is a stat... I was told it was because some cars have majority of their electronics in the footwell so it just became policy to then stat write-off ALL cars that had water higher than the sill.
This one did have water higher than the sill but the only electric module affected was under the passenger seat and $200 for a new one from Ford.
Seems crazy, yeah.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 10:12 AM   #8
Tassie f100
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,878
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

So you effectivly could have a repaired writeoff with 2 different VIN numbers,1 on the compliance plate and a different number on the chassis.Obviously only on a ute/truck type vehicle with a separate chassis.This used to happen quite often in the HQ-WB Holden era because he chassis rails bent quite easily and were replaced with changeovers as part of the repair process
Tassie f100 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 10:17 AM   #9
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tassie f100 View Post
So you effectivly could have a repaired writeoff with 2 different VIN numbers,1 on the compliance plate and a different number on the chassis.Obviously only on a ute/truck type vehicle with a separate chassis.This used to happen quite often in the HQ-WB Holden era because he chassis rails bent quite easily and were replaced with changeovers as part of the repair process
Yes, apparently so, though when you get it inspected you supply all the VINs of the cars whose parts you used, and they will then give you a surrogate VIN which is used for the car's registration.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 10:36 AM   #10
LG17
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
LG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Taromeo
Posts: 10,625
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Buy one stat and one repairable. Make sure you get a stat one like the one you missed out on. Cut out the chassis where the numbers are and swap them over.
No?
LG17 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 10:46 AM   #11
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LG17 View Post
Buy one stat and one repairable. Make sure you get a stat one like the one you missed out on. Cut out the chassis where the numbers are and swap them over.
No?
Yes, but first I'd like to see if there's another way with the stat I already have. I don't want to cut it up now that I've seen there's nothing wrong with it. It's worth more being rebuilt and sold to another country and using the profit to buy two more, a repairable and a stat with both structural damage.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 10:56 AM   #12
Vesper Martini
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Vesper Martini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Victoria
Posts: 7,854
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

You have to understand if you manage to fix up one of these cars and somehow get it registered.
There's the potential you could sell it to the none the wiser, then they encounter problems, that you didn't quite fix properly..

In other words these laws are to stop the dodgy characters that frequent Auctions looking for a quick buck at somebody's expense.
__________________
______________________________
2015 Territory Titanium RWD Diesel - SOLD
2016 BMW X5 xdrive 30D Msport
Seadoo Challenger 210SE 310HP
Vesper Martini is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 03-05-2017, 11:00 AM   #13
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bevsta007 View Post
You have to understand if you manage to fix up one of these cars and somehow get it registered.
There's the potential you could sell it to the none the wiser, then they encounter problems, that you didn't quite fix properly..

In other words these laws are to stop the dodgy characters that frequent Auctions looking for a quick buck at somebody's expense.
Yeah I do understand that but I think they've gone a bit overboard.
I don't want one to sell on and defraud someone, I want one to replace my falcon as it's getting on in years and the ranger is more suited to towing than a falcon is.

My falcon was also a flood-affected write-off and I've had it for about 10 years now but back then, being flooded didn't automatically mean statutory.

Though I won't rule out shifting this one off to NZ with full disclosure of its history so that I can buy two with significant structural damage and repair them to stay within the (silly) rule.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 12:28 PM   #14
Pis-ton broke
Banned
 
Pis-ton broke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,621
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

so you can re-register a repairable write off in Q.L? don,t think we can can in nsw.
Pis-ton broke is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 12:38 PM   #15
Tassie f100
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,878
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Don't know about NSW & QLD but I understand in both Vic & Tas repairable write offs can be re-registered,otherwise they wouldn't be tagged repairable.I thougt in NSW there were no repairable write offs on Stat writeoffs.Apparently the car manufacturers got in the ear of some halfwit pollie and convinced the Govt to write off every damaged vehicle so they could sell more new
Tassie f100 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 12:43 PM   #16
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,422
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bevsta007 View Post
You have to understand if you manage to fix up one of these cars and somehow get it registered.
There's the potential you could sell it to the none the wiser, then they encounter problems, that you didn't quite fix properly..

In other words these laws are to stop the dodgy characters that frequent Auctions looking for a quick buck at somebody's expense.
Would always be on a "repaired" register though, so just as much the buyer doing his Vin checks as is the seller to disclose.
__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 07:16 PM   #17
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

2015 ford ranger XLT with 27'000KM on the clock, statutory write-off from hail damage.

https://www.pickles.com.au/damaged-s...-Cab/802063693
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 07:31 PM   #18
Jastel
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,556
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Has much experience with taxis and always jumps on here to explain things simply and help out the new guys in B-series and Contemporary... 
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

I am in Qld and have repaired/reinspected/re-registered a few cars. I understand your frustration but can see why the Govt does it.

I had a wet (freshwater only) stat FG2 XR6, unbolted and cleaned literally everything and put it on my old 500000kms+ registered ex Taxi chassis...then threw the slightly damp FG2 chassis with 60000kms in the dump.

Sensible No...Legal Yes.

It is ok for you, you know the cars history, the Stat writeoff VIN is to protect the next and subsequent purchaser after you sell it...legally you must inform them of the vehicle history...even on a repairable w/o this kills most sales dead unless the price is adjusted downwards a lot.

They (insurance) dont take chances on water damage...what looks ok at the repair date can rust/corrode/wear out prematurely a year or so later. For example in my XR6 I just had to replace a Torque Converter, the shaft had rusted and ruined the seal leading to a leak, it wasnt underwater, no water in the box, but had been damaged from the initial incident. This was only a few hours work for me, using parts I had...to Joe Public this would have cost around $1000 probably.

That is why they have these rules.
Jastel is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 07:40 PM   #19
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jastel View Post
I had a wet (freshwater only) stat FG2 XR6, unbolted and cleaned literally everything and put it on my old 500000kms+ registered ex Taxi chassis...then threw the slightly damp FG2 chassis with 60000kms in the dump.

Sensible No...Legal Yes.
That's very interesting. Did the XR6 have any impact damage at all to the chassis? Are you saying that you put the body of a flooded stat-writeoff.... whole... in one piece... on to the chassis of another car and successfully registered it?

If so, may I ask what year you did this? What was your explanation to the inspection department as to why you put the body of the flood on to the chassis of the taxi? Did you need to provide anything else from the taxi, other than its chassis?
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 08:23 PM   #20
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,422
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by leesa View Post
That's very interesting. Did the XR6 have any impact damage at all to the chassis? Are you saying that you put the body of a flooded stat-writeoff.... whole... in one piece... on to the chassis of another car and successfully registered it?

If so, may I ask what year you did this? What was your explanation to the inspection department as to why you put the body of the flood on to the chassis of the taxi? Did you need to provide anything else from the taxi, other than its chassis?
No he used all the gear from the write off onto a High mileage car. Falcons aren't like a 4WD where you can seperate the body from the chassis.
Thats the way i read it.
__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 03-05-2017, 08:27 PM   #21
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,422
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by leesa View Post
2015 ford ranger XLT with 27'000KM on the clock, statutory write-off from hail damage.

https://www.pickles.com.au/damaged-s...-Cab/802063693
Hail damaged vehicles come into a whole new level. Most can still be reregistered as its cosmetic not structural. Check the legalities in QLD. I know in NSW and VIC there is an actual hail damage clause.
__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 08:37 PM   #22
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mont5.0 View Post
Hail damaged vehicles come into a whole new level. Most can still be reregistered as its cosmetic not structural. Check the legalities in QLD. I know in NSW and VIC there is an actual hail damage clause.
I did. In QLD you can only apply for a hail damage exemption if you were the registered owner of the car immediately before it was damaged.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 03-05-2017, 08:45 PM   #23
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mont5.0 View Post
No he used all the gear from the write off onto a High mileage car. Falcons aren't like a 4WD where you can seperate the body from the chassis.
Thats the way i read it.
How come he had to get it re-inspected and re-registered? I wouldn't have thought that would be necessary if he just bolted on to his taxi all the unboltable bits from the XR6?
Or do you think his first paragraph wasn't related to his second paragraph?

Last edited by leesa; 03-05-2017 at 08:52 PM.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 08:53 PM   #24
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,422
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jastel View Post
I am in Qld and have repaired/reinspected/re-registered a few cars. I understand your frustration but can see why the Govt does it.

I had a wet (freshwater only) stat FG2 XR6, unbolted and cleaned literally everything and put it on my old 500000kms+ registered ex Taxi chassis...then threw the slightly damp FG2 chassis with 60000kms in the dump.

Sensible No...Legal Yes.

It is ok for you, you know the cars history, the Stat writeoff VIN is to protect the next and subsequent purchaser after you sell it...legally you must inform them of the vehicle history...even on a repairable w/o this kills most sales dead unless the price is adjusted downwards a lot.

They (insurance) dont take chances on water damage...what looks ok at the repair date can rust/corrode/wear out prematurely a year or so later. For example in my XR6 I just had to replace a Torque Converter, the shaft had rusted and ruined the seal leading to a leak, it wasnt underwater, no water in the box, but had been damaged from the initial incident. This was only a few hours work for me, using parts I had...to Joe Public this would have cost around $1000 probably.

That is why they have these rules.
I highlighted the bit which i think answers your question.
__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 08:57 PM   #25
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mont5.0 View Post
I highlighted the bit which i think answers your question.
So if we compare that to the 4WD which does have a separate shell sitting on the chassis.... and you can apparently use both the shell and the chassis from a stat write-off... why can't I put the shell from a stat on to the chassis of a repairable? I can't understand why that's a "no"? Have I misunderstood something?
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 09:44 PM   #26
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,422
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

I would say its because the "Body" contains the VIN number, and the Vin number is recordered as the stat write off. so you can use every panel,interior,motor etc from that vehicle, as long as the VIN isnt used. So if you were to use a repairable write off as your base (vin not on stat records) then every part of the stat vehicle could be used, to fix the repairable vehicle. If that makes sense.(except for the part where the VIN number is literally)

So why not change just the VIN area you say?- because that would be considered REbirthing.
__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 03-05-2017, 10:16 PM   #27
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mont5.0 View Post
If that makes sense.(except for the part where the VIN number is literally)
What you're saying makes sense but it conflicts with what wovi have said.
They've said that the body and the chassis can be used despite them having identifiers on them. That those identifiers can be removed, put on the repairable, supplied to wovi for inspection and then a new surrogate vin will be supplied by wovi and given to the car.

So, what is the difference between giving a repairable writeoff a section (ANY section) of the body from a stat, versus giving a repairable the ENTIRE body from a stat? To me there should be no difference but apparently you can do the former but not the latter.

I'm going to contact someone about the ADR and find out exactly.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-05-2017, 10:42 PM   #28
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,422
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

You can probably google it.
__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-05-2017, 07:37 PM   #29
Jastel
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,556
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Has much experience with taxis and always jumps on here to explain things simply and help out the new guys in B-series and Contemporary... 
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Sorry I could have been clearer.

The XR6 was a wet stat, the ex taxi was a pretty sad 500000kms but still registered privately and roadworthy.
I put wiring, doors, panels, interior, suspension, engine and gearbox onto the old taxi chassis or "shell". Had to replace the diff cradle as that part was wet. Basically I got a 2014 FG2 XR6 with the nicer screen and interior and newer mechanicals for $1250 and a lot of work.

I went to Transport and just changed the engine number, nothing else changed. Looking at the car its a FG2 2014 XR6, but it is still legally a FG1 2010 XT on the old original VIN. This can cause problems when selling.

That car didnt need re inspecting obviously.

But I have re inspected other cars, and currently have 2 Black XR6's, one stat (again wet but runs fine), one repairable damage (but only has 3 wheels) currently, that I will make into one car. The 3 wheeled damaged chassis/shell is allowed to be fixed and will be the base for the "new" car, but the undamaged wet one has to be thrown away, but it will supply 90% of the parts for the "new" car. Both of these cars are pretty similar kms so will pick the best bits and keep the rest for taxi parts.

I have not done a real 4wd type chassis or got a new VIN.

I have a re registerable "shell" and fix it with bits from a stat or my shed. But as you know you do need to prove where the bits come from and the repairs were done properly etc. The reinspection companies are usually Manheim or Pickles who sold the wreck in the first place anyway so they do know what was wrong with it and what bits needed to be repaired. If you have your paperwork in order its half the battle.
Jastel is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-05-2017, 07:56 PM   #30
leesa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What's up with the new statutory write-off laws?

Thanks Jastel yes that does make sense.
I think what I'll end up doing is waiting for a repairable one with a crumpled body but straight chassis, lift the body off and put on the body from the stat. Though I'm not sure that will fly with wovi as technically the footwell has still been full of water. They're pretty upfront with explaining whether something has no hope of passing inspection so I'll ask and see how I go.

Last week I watched a 2016 ford ranger auction off for $17'000 as a stat-writeoff with impact damage front and back. It was insane.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL